It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: butcherguy
originally posted by: Chadwickus
a reply to: butcherguy
Maybe, but was it racial?
Doesn't seem to be the case now that the six bad cops mugshots have been shown..
The problem isn't the color of the people involved... it is that they are cops.
They have already been shown to be lying in this case.
They have a real problem with people that do not kowtow to them and will mess you up if you give them crap.
If you even began to understand what police have to go through. Your looking at things from a thugs point of view.
Do you really believe police go to work in the morning going man im going to beat up some people and arrest people because they piss me off?
originally posted by: Neutrality
a reply to: Bedlam
not accurate enough for a trial by law
CLARKE: FREDDIE GRAY CHARGES ‘DUKE LACROSSE CASE ALL OVER AGAIN’
Milwaukee County Sheriff David Clarke (D) declared the charges brought against six police officers in the death of Freddie Gray “George Zimmerman and the Duke Lacrosse case all over again” and said “these cops are political prisoners,” offered up as human sacrifices, thrown like red meat to an angry mob” on Friday’s “Your World with Neil Cavuto” on the Fox News Channel.
Clarke said of the charges, “it’s a miscarriage of justice. This neophyte prosecutor stood up there and made a political statement, Neil, and I say that because she’s chanting or voicing some of the chants from this angry mob. Her job is to tune that out. She said, I hear the voices. She’s not supposed to hear anything as she reviews this case that is not consistent with the rule of law and our system of justice.
Look, I’m an experienced and a veteran homicide detective. I’ve had — I’ve participated in charging conferences. There is no way I have ever gotten a criminal charge within 24 hours after taking over all the reports and evidence to a prosecutor. A prosecutor who is thorough needs several days to sift through hundreds of pages of reports.
They usually want to interview some of the witnesses themselves, in person, and they have to sift through all of the evidence, piece by piece, and they have to wait for some of the forensics evidence to conclude, to come back and that’s why I say on a minimum, three to four days. She just got this case yesterday.
This is political activism. She’ll never prove this beyond a reasonable doubt, and I’m not going to silently stand by and watch my brother officers, offered up as human sacrifices, thrown like red meat to an angry mob, just to appease this angry mob.” And that “she rushed this thing through.”
After his interview was cut off to carry a Fraternal Order of Police press conference live, he continued, “she knows she’s not going to be able to prove these charges beyond a reasonable doubt. This is George Zimmerman and the Duke Lacrosse case all over again. A politically active district attorney or state’s attorney, you can tell the emotion in her voice, she almost did this with glee. And that’s why I believe, like they [the FOP] do…she needs to remove herself from the case.
I hope the state’s attorney general gets involved in this, and sees the error of her ways. The smart thing for her to do is recuse herself and name a special prosecutor.”
originally posted by: dragonridr
originally posted by: butcherguy
originally posted by: Chadwickus
a reply to: butcherguy
Maybe, but was it racial?
Doesn't seem to be the case now that the six bad cops mugshots have been shown..
The problem isn't the color of the people involved... it is that they are cops.
They have already been shown to be lying in this case.
They have a real problem with people that do not kowtow to them and will mess you up if you give them crap.
If you even began to understand what police have to go through. Your looking at things from a thugs point of view. yeah the cops are after me again never their fault of course. theyll say well the police do nothing but beat us down simple means he ran and got caught. alot of peoples attitudes towards police depends on the situation they create. If the police stop you had it happen to me even arrested twice i was stupid as a teenager. But i complied they didnt beat me i was booked released went to court and it was done. I didnt blame the officers i screwed up hanging out with the wrong crowd. People blame the police when they are unwilling to shoulder the responsibility. They say things like i was framed the cops lie etc. Police make mistakes alot of them but they learn and eventually rookies learn to be better policeman. there will always be bad ones but very few of them are truly bad. Look at this case a man was put in charge of the van been with the police force along time. he picks up a prisoner to transport to jail. He doesnt strap him in and obviously he was injured. Its his fault bottom line but do you think he intentionally meant to hurt him?
Sorry for the rant just find it funny that people dont realize the double standards and the depths of their beliefs. People hate cops because they were arrested or they feel they are the enforcers for the man. Its all bogus excuses for people with little insight or responsibility.
originally posted by: butcherguy
a reply to: dragonridr
If you even began to understand what police have to go through. Your looking at things from a thugs point of view.
You could not be more wrong.
I have been very close to law enforcement since the age of 5 years.
I am not a thug. I have never been arrested.
I have watched cops break the law many times and have repeatedly listened to accounts by cops of how they violated the civil rights of all different kinds of citizens.
Do you really believe police go to work in the morning going man im going to beat up some people and arrest people because they piss me off?
Better yet, I have personally known a couple that didn't need to be pissed off beforehand. I got to watch one of them work someone over once.
The Thurman lawsuit brought about sweeping national reform of domestic violence laws, including the "Thurman Law" (aka the Family Violence Prevention and Response Act) instituted in Connecticut in 1986, making domestic violence an automatically arrestable offense, even if the victim does not wish to press charges
“I didn’t choose the thug life, the thug life chose me.” -Tupac Shakur
thug Also found in: Legal, Acronyms, Encyclopedia, Wikipedia. thug (thŭg) n.
1. A cutthroat or ruffian; a hoodlum.
2. also Thug One of a group of professional criminals, devotees of Kali, who robbed and murdered travelers in northern India until the mid-1800s.
Thug, a common criminal, who treats others violently and roughly, often for hire
Thug, proper noun, a member of the former Indian cult Thuggee
THe other Wiki, Thug
Definition of thug in English: noun
1A violent person, especially a criminal. [ Mid 19th century: extension of sense 2] Example sentences Synonyms
2 (Thug) historical A member of a religious organization of robbers and assassins in India. Devotees of the goddess Kali, the Thugs waylaid and strangled their victims, usually travelers, in a ritually prescribed manner. They were suppressed by the British in the 1830s.
thug noun ˈthəg : a violent criminal
Full Definition of THUG
: a brutal ruffian or assassin : gangster, tough
Origin of THUG
Hindi & Urdu ṭhag, literally, thief
First Known Use: 1810
So justice only applies to people who suffer an injustice.. Like having your business / place of employment burned down for no reason at all...