TWA flight 800, page 4
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 2 times


reply posted on 23-2-2008 @ 09:26 PM by infinityoreilly
reply to post by Skadi_the_Evil_Elf



The missile theory is sound. It did not have to detonate to bring down the aircraft.

From what I understand training exercises like this, near populated areas, use dummy missiles for these type operations. Now once the missile was off course nothing could be done about it.

The center fuel tank showed outward ruptures, most likely on the side opposite the war game thearter.

Once a missile locks on to a heat signature, its pretty much over unless evasive is taken.

The level of involvement the Navy had in recovery was pretty weird, maybe so no one would find the piece that showed the missiles entry point.

I remember when Salinger first came out with the missile theory, thats when it hit me how much time, effort, people, and money was spent on recovery.


reply posted on 23-4-2010 @ 02:04 PM by hooper
reply to post by REMISNE



Because once it was determined NOT TO BE A CRIME SCENE it was treated as accidental crash scene wherein investigators were TRYING TO DETERMINE THE CAUSE OF THE CRASH.

On 9/11 the cause of the crashes was not under investigation. Just the persons who caused it (terrorist).



reply posted on 26-4-2010 @ 04:07 PM by theability
reply to post by hooper



a) You have your very own definition of "complete" that no one else is privvy to and
b) Law enforcement agencies are not in the habit now, or ever have been, of releasing all their investigation records to the general public before a trial.



There is a definition for a complete investigation, when the investigation has look at all evidence and theories and formulates a hypothesis then checks the hypothesis against this evidence, it must fit.

With flight 800 there was way to many issues with the evidence that supported further investigation, and the adaption of new theories to fit the evidence at hand.

Not forgetting evidence, changing evidence or omitting the evidence to fit a predetermined Answer!

Sounds like 9/11.....


reply posted on 26-4-2010 @ 04:38 PM by hooper
Originally posted by theability
reply to
post by hooper



a) You have your very own definition of "complete" that no one else is privvy to and
b) Law enforcement agencies are not in the habit now, or ever have been, of releasing all their investigation records to the general public before a trial.



There is a definition for a complete investigation, when the investigation has look at all evidence and theories and formulates a hypothesis then checks the hypothesis against this evidence, it must fit.

With flight 800 there was way to many issues with the evidence that supported further investigation, and the adaption of new theories to fit the evidence at hand.

Not forgetting evidence, changing evidence or omitting the evidence to fit a predetermined Answer!

Sounds like 9/11.....



Then you too have your own definition of complete. That is all. You think they should just open the door to every Tom, Dick and Harry to offer an opnion and then not close the investigation until every possibility that anyone can think of has been thoroughly vetted, affirmed, denied, compiled, researched, recorded, publish and re-published.

In other words, no investigation would ever end as long as there was one more person in the world with one more opinion.

And on and on and on and on......


reply posted on 26-4-2010 @ 04:53 PM by theability
reply to post by hooper




Then you too have your own definition of complete.



Complete: 1 a : having all necessary parts, elements, or steps

Investigation: 1 a : the act or process of investigating or the condition of being investigated.
2.a searching inquiry for ascertaining facts; detailed or careful examination.


Complete Invesitgation would be all the parts, elements and steps of a search inquiry of the details of a careful examination.

Now to have something complete, means nothing was left out, lets not argue symantecs here you must inclusde all things to be valid in investigation.



reply posted on 26-4-2010 @ 05:10 PM by johnathanalexanderpike
reply to post by Skadi_the_Evil_Elf




I remember the news that night of people on long island stating what they seen in the air that appeared to be a missile hitting the plane and than going down.

Now am i confusing planes or was it TWA 800 that had a small passenger list 20 some people with the majority being Egyptian Military. If it was the same plane as i am thinking there were radio reports the day after in Egypt of them saying this is a great day for Islam and they are martyrs or the like.


reply posted on 27-4-2010 @ 09:55 AM by hooper
reply to post by theability



Sorry, complete does not mean allthings. There must be an element of rational relevancy. Again, you can have a reasonably complete "investigation" or survey or examination or whatever, applying the word complete does not require one to vet every claim.

Don't forget, complete also means done or finished.


reply posted on 27-4-2010 @ 10:01 AM by hooper
reply to post by REMISNE



Sorry but thier is only one definition of a complete criminal ivestigation.


Yes, it means an investigation that is finished. I know you don't think they are done, but I really don't think your opinion (like mine) really matters.

The indictment of Mossaui implicates him in the "official story", he plead guilty and his defense took no objection to the veracity mountain of material that was to be placed in evidence against him for his participation in the "official story". Sorry, it was tested and passed in an American Court of Law. It is complete.

Where, in your vast knowledge of criminal investigations, has there ever been a case where the investigating agency released their investigation records to the general public without a trial?


reply posted on 27-4-2010 @ 01:26 PM by theability
reply to post by hooper



Yes, it means an investigation that is finished.


Completed is the word for that hooper!

A complete investigation involves all aspects of the inverstigation.

Seriously you should get a job for rewriting the dictionary!

here so you can see the "accurate definition of completed:

completed:
1 : to bring to an end and especially into a perfected state "complete a painting"

see how is says to 'perfect' the work?

Now complete:
1: having all parts or elements; lacking nothing; whole; entire; full: a complete set of Mark Twain's writings; or a complete investigation!

Symantecs aside the obviosu nature of the FBI in this case shows that the evidence was thrown out, discredited etc etc etc...
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>    ^^TOP^^



9-11 lecture at Basel University, Switzerland.
  Posted 15 days ago with 14 member flags
9/11 Actors re-visited
  Posted 8 days ago with 13 member flags
Building Collapses in Rio
  Posted 15 days ago with 6 member flags
new film "Human the film (2012)" covers all the bases and more!
  Posted 10 days ago with 6 member flags
Remains of 9/11 victim identified
  Posted 1 days ago with 5 member flags
you must try this youre self ????
  Posted 15 days ago with 4 member flags