It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Sorry, but is the west now coming to the aid of Islam? Since when?
originally posted by: Xcathdra
a reply to: GovtFlu
The relevant Russian agency said no to Tatar tv.. they pulled the plug on their ability to broadcast.
Of course its called 'mind conditioning'. First
they make you 'fear' the enemy in question which was at the time of nine eleven
the twin towers incident. Then they completely do a switch trick on everyone
and start catering to a muslim religion no one is even equated with. 'that love hate
And No, I don't believe Putin is as evil as the Zionists, he's shown no implications
that he is trying to destroy the middle east countries, ruin the economy of his
own country, or rule the planet.
Crap like equal rights, freedom of speech and the right to pursuit happiness?
ts Russia who stand against the crap that western society
I hope you're joking, because Chechnyans would strongly disagree, Russia started the Afghanistan mess, right after WWII, but more so in 1979, when he set the grounds for terrorist groups to rise.
And No, I don't believe Putin is as evil as the Zionists, he's shown no implications that he is trying to destroy the middle east countries, ruin the economy of his own country, or rule the planet.
in the times, he addressed the American publicly, timesWhen he knew this would make it impossible to justify an intervention in Syria, with the Bush debakle of Iraq still in the back of our collective heads. And what happened? Look how many die and who benefits from it? Just Putin. Not even Russia, or the Russian people, they suffer a severe loss of life quality and honour, but the # head on top gets all the money all the fame and still has dumb asses not seeing what he is up to.
Relations between us have passed through different stages. We stood against each other during the cold war. But we were also allies once, and defeated the Nazis together. The universal international organization — the United Nations — was then established to prevent such devastation from ever happening again. The United Nations’ founders understood that decisions affecting war and peace should happen only by consensus, and with America’s consent the veto by Security Council permanent members was enshrined in the United Nations Charter. The profound wisdom of this has underpinned the stability of international relations for decades.
Can Syria's Chemical Arsenal Be Destroyed?SEPT. 11, 2013 No one wants the United Nations to suffer the fate of the League of Nations, which collapsed because it lacked real leverage. This is possible if influential countries bypass the United Nations and take military action without Security Council authorization. The potential strike by the United States against Syria, despite strong opposition from many countries and major political and religious leaders, including the pope, will result in more innocent victims and escalation, potentially spreading the conflict far beyond Syria’s borders. A strike would increase violence and unleash a new wave of terrorism. It could undermine multilateral efforts to resolve the Iranian nuclear problem and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and further destabilize the Middle East and North Africa. It could throw the entire system of international law and order out of balance.