It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: ScientificRailgun
a reply to: beezzer
Ahhh. I must have misinterpreted your post then. I sincerely apologize for getting salty with you.
The Koch Bros started one faction of "The Tea Party".
The dozens of other factions are from other groups and other people.
But the "* SCARE *" factor is universal among Progressives and other concerned opposition.
Citizens for a Sound Economy (CSE) was established in 1984 by David H. Koch and Charles Koch of Koch Industries. Ron Paul was appointed as the first chairman of the organization. "CSE received almost $5 million from various Koch foundations between 1986 and 1990, and David Koch and several Koch Industries employees serve[d] as directors of CSE and the CSE Foundation."[1] In 1989, CSE purchased the financially troubled Tax Foundation and operated it as a subsidiary from CSE's offices until the split in 2004.[2][disputed – discuss] In 2003, Dick Armey became the chairman of CSE after retiring from Congress.[3] In 2004, Citizens for a Sound Economy split into FreedomWorks, for 501c4 advocacy activity, and Americans for Prosperity Foundation. Dick Armey stayed as chairman of FreedomWorks, while David Koch stayed as Chairman of Americans for Prosperity Foundation.
originally posted by: beezzer
a reply to: ScientificRailgun
That post wasn't directed at you, but to everyone who looked at ideology first.
I actually like this thread because it was very telling.
The concept of punishing different ideas apparently comes with a caveat to ideology.
originally posted by: MystikMushroom
I'd say banning the term "climate change" is very 1984 in and of itself.
originally posted by: Benevolent Heretic
originally posted by: grandmakdw
Check out these links, all I'm going to say
I don't know what you're responding to in my post. I looked at the first link and I don't know what you're trying to tell me. I'm not going to try to figure out what you're trying to say by trying to read your mind or read through a bunch of stuff that has nothing to do with Al Gore punishing anyone. If you want to tell me something, you're going to have to come right out and say it. Sorry.
This thread is hyperbole and not true. That's all that really matters to me. All this other superfluous crap is meaningless.
originally posted by: ScientificRailgun
a reply to: grandmakdw
If see what Al Gore said as an attack on freedom, what do you say to people who tell others not to vote for candidates that support pro-choice?
originally posted by: Thecakeisalie
a reply to: grandmakdw
That is a very detailed post but it fails to answer my question, How is Al Gore linked to NSA surveillance and Samsung?
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: smkymcnugget420
Yes, because reddit is the cutting edge of political discourse. *eyeroll*
originally posted by: grandmakdw
It is demonstrating our slow march toward totalitarianism
If you choose not to read the links, that is up to you. But then saying you don't get the point is redundant when you won't read the links, which lead up to the main point.
originally posted by: grandmakdw
Voting ones conscience is fine, no problem
Suggesting that people should punish others for incorrect thought is an attack on freedom.
BTW: You choose an example that does not fit my beliefs, you made an incorrect assumption about me.
originally posted by: MystikMushroom
I'd say banning the term "climate change" is very 1984 in and of itself.
The street runs both ways.