It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: beezzer
You won't get much support in fighting this until a conservative tries it.
Florida's ban on using the words "climate change" and "global warming" in official communications goes beyond just the state's Department of Environmental Protection to other government agencies under Gov. Rick Scott (R), according to a new report by the Florida Center for Investigative Reporting.
originally posted by: ScientificRailgun
a reply to: beezzer
The difference being in Florida an elected official did.
Here, it's FORMER elected official with no say in government dealing anymore beyond what words his money can buy him.
Big difference. If a democrat in congress has suggested this, I'd be right there with the angry conservatives.
originally posted by: Benevolent Heretic
originally posted by: beezzer
You won't get much support in fighting this until a conservative tries it.
Beez, your REALLY should look beyond the sensationalist (and false) title before posting... A conservative has DONE it already...
Florida's ban on using the words "climate change" and "global warming" in official communications goes beyond just the state's Department of Environmental Protection to other government agencies under Gov. Rick Scott (R), according to a new report by the Florida Center for Investigative Reporting.
Source
originally posted by: ScientificRailgun
Was there a law passed criminalizing denying climate change?
I must have missed it.
I thought 1984 was 31 years ago. Weird.
originally posted by: beezzer
originally posted by: ScientificRailgun
a reply to: beezzer
The difference being in Florida an elected official did.
Here, it's FORMER elected official with no say in government dealing anymore beyond what words his money can buy him.
Big difference. If a democrat in congress has suggested this, I'd be right there with the angry conservatives.
Alot of people say that, but I doubt it, sorry, but I do.
People are more apt to defend someone of their own ideology than to defend an abstract term like freedom.
originally posted by: Edumakated
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus
But his opinions aren't law nor are they even being considered to be laws. The OP is a lie. 1984 isn't here, because the opinions in it are just opinions of one man who REALLY takes climate change seriously.
Though this shows an interesting case study. Al Gore presents an opinion, and the right freaks the f out like it is being implemented tomorrow. Why does it look like the right wants to silence Al Gore while at the same time screaming that their right to deny science is going to be suppressed? At the end of the day, I just seem two groups of people saying opposing opinions. Oh and a thread full of hyperbole.
So if being an elected official is all that matters, then we should expect the progressive left to shut about the Koch brothers right?
originally posted by: beezzer
Yep, and I bet you are against that!
I've read it. Sorry, I guess you didn't get my sarcasm. Anyone who took even High School english should have read that book.
originally posted by: grandmakdw
originally posted by: ScientificRailgun
Was there a law passed criminalizing denying climate change?
I must have missed it.
I thought 1984 was 31 years ago. Weird.
I am referring to the classic book
1984 by George Orwell
Sorry you never heard of it, I highly recommend you read it. It is referred to frequently on ATS and is necessary to read to participate logically in many threads on ATS.
originally posted by: KawRider9
originally posted by: Edumakated
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus
But his opinions aren't law nor are they even being considered to be laws. The OP is a lie. 1984 isn't here, because the opinions in it are just opinions of one man who REALLY takes climate change seriously.
Though this shows an interesting case study. Al Gore presents an opinion, and the right freaks the f out like it is being implemented tomorrow. Why does it look like the right wants to silence Al Gore while at the same time screaming that their right to deny science is going to be suppressed? At the end of the day, I just seem two groups of people saying opposing opinions. Oh and a thread full of hyperbole.
So if being an elected official is all that matters, then we should expect the progressive left to shut about the Koch brothers right?
Quoted for truth. I hear some saying he's not a politician so shut up. But then spout some BS about the Koch bros. Sad times when all the majority wants to do is scream, "GO TEAM"!!!
We are doomed if that mentality doesn't change soon.
originally posted by: ScientificRailgun
a reply to: beezzer
Except Al Gore didn't say to punish just anyone for denying climate change. He suggested not funding political candidates who deny climate change. Big, HUGE difference there. People fund or not fund political candidates based on pushing a certain agenda. This is NO different.
I love it when people on the right suggest I won't defend freedom. I also love it when people on the left suggest I don't defend equal rights. Being a centrist makes me so happy. I'm sure Benevolent Heretic would call me a right winger. I've had plenty of arguments with her about gun rights and police brutality. And then here in this thread I'm told I don't defend freedom.
originally posted by: beezzer
originally posted by: ScientificRailgun
a reply to: beezzer
The difference being in Florida an elected official did.
Here, it's FORMER elected official with no say in government dealing anymore beyond what words his money can buy him.
Big difference. If a democrat in congress has suggested this, I'd be right there with the angry conservatives.
Alot of people say that, but I doubt it, sorry, but I do.
People are more apt to defend someone of their own ideology than to defend an abstract term like freedom.
originally posted by: ScientificRailgun
I've read it. Sorry, I guess you didn't get my sarcasm. Anyone who took even High School english should have read that book.
originally posted by: grandmakdw
originally posted by: ScientificRailgun
Was there a law passed criminalizing denying climate change?
I must have missed it.
I thought 1984 was 31 years ago. Weird.
I am referring to the classic book
1984 by George Orwell
Sorry you never heard of it, I highly recommend you read it. It is referred to frequently on ATS and is necessary to read to participate logically in many threads on ATS.