It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
why does that matter? they barely speak english and will never repay you.
what does that do for you if you save them instead of the billionaire?
David Lynch, the film director, speaks about when he discovered Transcendental meditation and how it transformed his life.
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
Transcendental Meditation has no discernable health benefits.
originally posted by: bb23108
a reply to: Itisnowagain
I agree with you about enjoying different ways of expressing non-dualism, but I have a hard time equating the recent new-age talking school folks with the great adept realizers of various spiritual backgrounds and real spiritual practice.
originally posted by: [post=19104782]
It has been realized that reality does not have to be practiced or sought - just realized.
originally posted by: Itisnowagain
a reply to: bb23108
What do you consider 'real spiritual practice'?
originally posted by: Itisnowagain
How is it a mental disposition when it is pointing to what is here. Mental is time and space, about what can be or should be - about what isn't happening.
This is happening. Is what is actually happening of the mental realm?
Seeing is happening. Hearing is happening. Wording is happening. Reading is just happening. It is all just simply happening.
Knowing that there is just now simply happening is what might be called spiritual.
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: Itisnowagain
I suppose the proof would be in eating the pudding.
Or in the research.
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: Itisnowagain
Knowing that there is just now simply happening is what might be called spiritual.
Knowing such a thing is easy. It's evident. Becoming unnecessarily crippled by it, whether it be negatively or positively, might be called spiritual.
The scientific method would be direct observation. Would you rather be a believer of second-hand knowledge or actually know first hand?
Do you trust anyone else ?
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: Itisnowagain
The scientific method would be direct observation. Would you rather be a believer of second-hand knowledge or actually know first hand?
Do you trust anyone else ?
If that is the case, brushing your teeth with feces protects the teeth better than toothpaste and mouthwash, but you'll have to do it a few times at least.
10 years of hate towards friends and family is the key to enlightenment and peace.
But that's right, indirect and circumstantial are both used in science and law. You might be confusing it with anecdotal evidence, for instance, David Lynch's speech.