It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: rebelv
Not even close. It's still owned by the UK with the US leasing the base facilities. It's a major base for US forces in the region. There's no way they'd sell it to anyone ever if they bought it from the UK.
originally posted by: twentyeight
The best line from the article:
"Soon after, the story ended the way most news stories do: We just stopped talking about it."
Lol. That's the truth
originally posted by: jaffo
originally posted by: SteeBoo
Consider this.
The feds still maintain that TWA 800 was brought down by bad wiring, despite 90% of commercial pilots saying it was a missile.
They lied about it because the truth would cause way too much panic among the population.
I think we are looking at the exact same deal here.
If they went public and said the plane landed in Kazakhstan the public would be outraged and demand a response. Which I think is exactly what Putin wants, and exactly what ObamaCo fears the most.
So they did what they do best, they lied.
I was unaware that all of the World's pilots had been interviewed and that 90% of them agreed a missile brought that plane down. Odd that if a missile brought that plane down, it has never happened again. Also odd that if it were truly what happened, "they" (scary music here) would not have used that reality to get us into a war, right? Which kind of sort of means that no, it was not a missile. Hard to keep all of the wacky theories around here playing nice with each other, huh? ;-)
originally posted by: SteeBoo
originally posted by: jaffo
originally posted by: SteeBoo
Consider this.
The feds still maintain that TWA 800 was brought down by bad wiring, despite 90% of commercial pilots saying it was a missile.
They lied about it because the truth would cause way too much panic among the population.
I think we are looking at the exact same deal here.
If they went public and said the plane landed in Kazakhstan the public would be outraged and demand a response. Which I think is exactly what Putin wants, and exactly what ObamaCo fears the most.
So they did what they do best, they lied.
I was unaware that all of the World's pilots had been interviewed and that 90% of them agreed a missile brought that plane down. Odd that if a missile brought that plane down, it has never happened again. Also odd that if it were truly what happened, "they" (scary music here) would not have used that reality to get us into a war, right? Which kind of sort of means that no, it was not a missile. Hard to keep all of the wacky theories around here playing nice with each other, huh? ;-)
90% of TWA pilots, sorry for not clarifying.
And TWA was likely shot down by our own Navy, not by terrorists or a foreign power.
Not going to get in depth into the case, you can read, and Google.
The point was that when the powers that be decide the truth will do too much harm, they lie.
originally posted by: bbracken677
a reply to: rebelv
Geez louise...
I guess since we have subs off the Russian and Chinese coasts we must also have sub bases in China and Russian?
I was unaware that modern subs were so limited in range. I guess I learn something new every day... even if that something new is crappola.
originally posted by: drock905
I imagine everyone who comes up with a new theory, even a complicated one, must experience one particularly delicious moment, like a perfect chord change, when disorder gives way to order. This was that moment for me. Once I threw out the troublesome BFO data, all the inexplicable coincidences and mismatched data went away. The answer became wonderfully simple. The plane must have gone north.
Using the BTO data set alone,I was able to chart the plane’s speed and general path, which happened to fall along national borders.Fig. 21 Flying along borders, a military navigator told me, is a good way to avoid being spotted on radar. A Russian intelligence plane nearly collided with a Swedish airliner while doing it over the Baltic Sea in December
How Crazy am I to think I know where MH370 is? Jeff Wise in NY Magazine
More from the article:
I realized that I already had a clue that hijackers had been in the E/E bay. Remember the satcom system disconnected and then rebooted three minutes after the plane left military radar behind. I spent a great deal of time trying to figure out how a person could physically turn the satcom off and on. The only way, apart from turning off half the entire electrical system, would be to go into the E/E bay and pull three particular circuit breakers. It is a maneuver that only a sophisticated operator would know how to execute, and the only reason I could think for wanting to do this was so that Inmarsat would find the records and misinterpret them. They turned on the satcom in order to provide a false trail of bread crumbs leading away from the plane’s true route.
This was just published a few hours ago and I found it very interesting. It's a pretty long essay but the evidence seems very convincing.
He claims what he has discovered leads to the theory that the plane was hijacked by very sophisticated hijackers. They were able to spoof the satellite data transmissions and then fly the plane to Kazakhstan where it was hidden. He names the suspected landing strip complete with satellite images and goes into detail on how it could have been done.