It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Congress Bill to Defund Taxpayer Money for Abortion

page: 3
7
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 28 2015 @ 09:51 AM
link   
a reply to: macman

Because women get pregnant, men do not. So the women make the responsible decision of not bringing an unwanted child into this current system of things. You are better off dead than to live in poverty with no hope. Make a better world and women won't make desparate choices. Now answer my question.




posted on Jan, 28 2015 @ 09:52 AM
link   
a reply to: Seamrog

Feeling guilty?



posted on Jan, 28 2015 @ 09:55 AM
link   
a reply to: buster2010

Yeah,it is legal and so is gambling but you can't gamble with other's money....



posted on Jan, 28 2015 @ 09:56 AM
link   
a reply to: therationalist

Tell that to the people running Wall Street.



posted on Jan, 28 2015 @ 09:58 AM
link   
a reply to: macman

No pro-choice means that we are ok with someone CHOOSING to carry out the abortion, that doesn't mean that we would make the choice to have an abortion if we were in that situation.



posted on Jan, 28 2015 @ 10:00 AM
link   
a reply to: MOMof3
Good... So since only women get pregnant, they should be held responsible for their decision for getting pregnant and thus forced to pay for abortion.
If they can't, then they shouldn't be treated as adults under law...



posted on Jan, 28 2015 @ 10:02 AM
link   
a reply to: therationalist

Why do men make babies they don't want? It still takes two. I grew up with brothers. They never have an answer either.

Why did I have to bail out Wall Street?

Why do I have to pay for wars that kill other people's babies?
edit on 28-1-2015 by MOMof3 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 28 2015 @ 10:06 AM
link   
a reply to: Krazysh0t

Ha ha ha..........So women want to make choices but don't want to be held responsible for their choices.......that makes them childish...



posted on Jan, 28 2015 @ 10:08 AM
link   
a reply to: MOMof3

You didn't answer the question.

Why should the tax payer fund abortion?



posted on Jan, 28 2015 @ 10:09 AM
link   
a reply to: therationalist

My twelve year old niece did not get a choice when she was raped and impregnated. That was 20 years ago and she is still a mess in her head. If you get raped, is pregnancy a problem for you?



posted on Jan, 28 2015 @ 10:11 AM
link   

originally posted by: therationalist
a reply to: Krazysh0t

Ha ha ha..........So women want to make choices but don't want to be held responsible for their choices.......that makes them childish...


No, what is childish is calling someone names for failing to live up to your expectations as to how someone should live. You don't know what is going on in ANY of the women's lives that decide to have an abortion. All the things they have to weight to come to the decision to abort and you are sitting here calling them names and being derisive while sitting behind a computer screen.

Also, women aren't the only people who choose to have sex. Men also factor into that equation and are just as responsible for getting the woman pregnant. Stop putting the weight of the pregnancy entirely on the woman. It takes two to tango after all.
edit on 28-1-2015 by Krazysh0t because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 28 2015 @ 10:12 AM
link   
I find it so sad that the Liberals best argument for killing a child is that it would cost too much money to raise an unwanted child. And they are supposed to be the ones with heart???



posted on Jan, 28 2015 @ 10:15 AM
link   
a reply to: macman

Which tax payer program pays for abortions? I am not familiar with that since I never had an abortion.

The taxpayer needs to pay for an abortion if a woman can't afford it. Then we would not need food stamps and welfare on such an expensive scale. Families with children are the biggest welfare recipients.



posted on Jan, 28 2015 @ 10:20 AM
link   

originally posted by: macman
a reply to: jimmyx

Another Progressive hyper emotional response, that is about as off topic as a football bat.

Removing tax payer funding does not make anything illegal. It removes tax payer funding.

Got anything else you care to discuss??? Maybe a hockey ball? Or a tennis mit?


so you want to remove the tax-payer funding of it...ok....so, why not start at the top of the food chain, with the people that have the money, and eliminate tax-payer funding on that segment of the populace, rather than on the poorest?....you are directing all your outrage at people that can least afford it



posted on Jan, 28 2015 @ 10:21 AM
link   
a reply to: MOMof3

Unless a man forces a woman to get pregnant, he cannot be logically held responsible for a woman getting pregnant due to the fact that only a woman can get pregnant.........in the past, a woman's body was considered the property of her husband,so he was held responsible for her pregnancy...........but now a woman is the master of her own body, therefore, she should be held responsible for whatever actions of her body...
A man cannot be held responsible for the result of something which a woman consensually inserts in her body.....



posted on Jan, 28 2015 @ 10:23 AM
link   
a reply to: therationalist

Thanks. I needed a good laugh.



posted on Jan, 28 2015 @ 10:28 AM
link   

originally posted by: MOMof3
a reply to: macman

Which tax payer program pays for abortions? I am not familiar with that since I never had an abortion.

The taxpayer needs to pay for an abortion if a woman can't afford it. Then we would not need food stamps and welfare on such an expensive scale. Families with children are the biggest welfare recipients.



you are absolutely right, and Macman is absolutely wrong.....the government DOES NOT PAY FOR ABORTIONS!!!....as with anything said by the right-wing, it first should always be checked to see if it's factual....usually I do this...so here it is...www.fundabortionnow.org...

not since 1977 has it been funded by the government...so what's that argument again, Macman??????????



posted on Jan, 28 2015 @ 10:29 AM
link   
a reply to: Krazysh0t

Drama cannot replace logical arguments....
If you want to live as you wish because MY BoDy my Choice then Don't force anyone to pay for your choices..............
If you cannot follow such simple rules then don't call yourself an adult...


.



posted on Jan, 28 2015 @ 10:29 AM
link   

originally posted by: macman
a reply to: MOMof3

You didn't answer the question.

Why should the tax payer fund abortion?



they don't, so what's your argument?



posted on Jan, 28 2015 @ 10:34 AM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

Here is one people may have not heard of.

“Unborn Child Protection from Dismemberment Abortion Act.”

Look we have to pass a law to stop dismembering the unborn in the womb.

What a world, we definitely are on the edge of not know right from wrong.

Why should my tax dollars pay for this barbaric act?

Kansas Gov. Sam Brownback: I Will Sign Bill Banning Dismemberment Abortions
www.lifenews.com...



In a move that it tells LifeNews.com will transform the landscape of abortion policy in the United States, National Right to Life announced a major new component of the right to life movement’s 2015 legislative agenda with today’s introduction in Kansas of the Unborn Child Protection from Dismemberment Abortion Act. The pro-life group says the wave of pro-life victories in the 2014 election helped set the stage for this first-of-its-kind legislation, which would protect unborn children from the brutality of dismemberment abortion.

“Dismemberment abortion kills a baby by tearing her apart limb from limb,” said National Right to Life Director of State Legislation Mary Spaulding Balch, J.D. “Before the first trimester ends, the unborn child has a beating heart, brain waves, and every organ system in place. Dismemberment abortions occur after the baby has reached these milestones.”

edit on 103131p://bWednesday2015 by Stormdancer777 because: (no reason given)




top topics



 
7
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join