It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: OtherSideOfTheCoin
The problem is not Islam, the problem is Saudi-Arabia
originally posted by: OtherSideOfTheCoin
originally posted by: Telos
Islam is cancer. End of the story. I know some here might not like it but hey, this is my opinion and is not going to change.
You are entitled to your opinion.
Can i ask why you hate Islam so strongly?
originally posted by: Ceeker63
Islam is the only religion in the world that is violent. The senior religious leaders could put a stop to the violence, if they where not living in the 7th century. Violence against religious people that are outspoken is completely wrong.
I'm just trying to understand which 'Quran' is the true one and how did one get so perverted?
originally posted by: CharlieSpeirs
a reply to: Telos
Using Religion Of Peace as a source and lambasting people's IQ levels are not advisable & inherently contradictory to someone trying to prove a point.
I do appreciate the work you put into those posts, but if Religion Of Peace is a source, I'd also question the others...
Maybe Forbes would be acceptable but I'm not a fan of percentage polls to be fair...
They could ask 5 people and get 3 that agree & that paints 1.7 Billion people?
Even if they polled thousands... It's still a sketchy assessment of the beliefs & opinions of billions imo.
The court began hearing the case—which is being brought by a 23-year-old French Muslim woman identified only by her initials S.A.S.—on November 27. According to a summary of the case published by the court, S.A.S. sued the French State in April 2011, when legislation banning people from covering their faces in public places came into force. S.A.S. argues that the French law violates six articles of the European Convention on Human Rights. These are: Article 3 (no one shall be subjected to inhuman or degrading treatment); Article 8 (right to respect for private and family life); Article 9 (freedom of thought, conscience and religion); Article 10 (freedom of expression); Article 11 (freedom of assembly and association); and Article 14 (prohibition of discrimination).
originally posted by: TruthxIsxInxThexMist
a reply to: MALBOSIA
You should have quoted because I didn't say that.
The op is about the Saudi who got whipped for a blog on the net.
originally posted by: OtherSideOfTheCoin
originally posted by: TruthxIsxInxThexMist
a reply to: OtherSideOfTheCoin
It IS that simple.
They would keep their values but not be associated with the strict 'Sharia' and don't say they are not associated with it because they are... It doesn't matter whether it's 'wahhabism' or not... at the moment its all falling under 'Islam' and that is one word, one Religion.
If you have 'Peaceful Islam' as a Religion we will see who flocks to it... those who don;'t will be supporting 'Sharia' and it's strict codes!
In that case it already exists, there are loads of moderate Muslims out there who practice peacefully and have totally disowned the extremists actually it is my experience that this is true of most Muslims.
And yet the sentence calls for 950 more! How excessively cruel is that?