It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: HawkeyeNation
originally posted by: crazyewok
originally posted by: HawkeyeNation
Brown was fleeing but how in the # is the cop to know that he won't go and take someone else's life, steal a car that could have children in them.
THAT IS ABSOLUTE BULL #!
Police are not there to be jury and make decision on what they MAY do.
You should NEVER shoot something for just robbery or running from the police!
If he was not armed there was NO justification.
By your logic the police should shoot jay walkers or speeders? O lets just execute random people based on what they MAY do.
a NON violent crimes only deserves NON violent action by the police!
You are so blind. Never shoot anyone for robbery or running from police...really. Armed robbery is no longer considered a threat? Un#ing believable...how about we hold our society responsible for their actions.
Also from what the OP is stating the criminal was armed?
originally posted by: GreenMtnBoys
a reply to: LDragonFire
Look at the shoes!!!!!!!!!!!! its him!
The man in the above pic is wearing dark pants the man in the video is not wearing dark pants.
There was no reason for that cop to use lethal force against him and when the guy is standing there with his arms up after he had already shot him then the cop should be charged with at least 2nd degree murder.