It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
So you admit that those pills you are begging for are toxic and you want everyone to pay for your toxic chemicals?
originally posted by: buster2010
originally posted by: seabag
originally posted by: kaylaluv
originally posted by: Benevolent Heretic
I will never go to a Hobby Lobby again. And I just might join a protest.
I'm with you, BH.
I'll only go to Michael's from here on out. And I know plenty who will do the same.
I think I might pack up the family and do some shopping at Hobby Lobby tonight!! After some quick dinner at Chick-fil-A of course!!
Pack up the family? What do you do put them in boxes?
originally posted by: dawnstar
a reply to: butcherguy
you want the privilege to ingest toxic chemicals to avoid impregnating women also at no cost??
I don't really think you do. And well are there any drugs on the market that enable you to?? No??? That's probably because it's the men (who really don't want that responsibility placed on them) that have been the main players to bringing them to market!
originally posted by: windword
originally posted by: butcherguy
originally posted by: windword
a reply to: butcherguy
Everything that I have heard coming from legal people says that if a closely held company finds religious objection to any birth control methods other than those four listed in the suit, they will have to go to court to have their claim upheld.
Not true. SCOTUS ruled that ALL birth control falls into the exempted category. Not just those 4 methods. Employers, that qualify, will not have to to go to court again to deny birth control, any birth control coverage.
I am not finding that anywhere. The legal beagles on the talking head shows are saying differently.
Source please!
The Supreme Court delivered a blow to universal birth control coverage on Monday, ruling that closely-held corporations can refuse to cover contraception in their health plans for religious reasons.
www.huffingtonpost.com...
SCOTUS did not review which methods can or can't be denied. They ALL can be denied if the employers sincerely believes they oppose his/her religious views. That includes Catholics, who oppose ALL forms of birth control.
originally posted by: butcherguy
By the ACA guidelines, women have CONDOMS paid for by insurance, men do not. .
I don't see anything that you are saying in the article.
originally posted by: windword
a reply to: butcherguy
I don't see anything that you are saying in the article.
I didn't see any citation from you refuting the claim. Do you think that the 5 Catholic men, on the Supreme Court, are responsible for a ruling that discriminates against Catholic employers with objections? Is this ruling for protestant fundies only?
Nope. This ruling allows for the denial of any and all birth control by a qualified employer.
originally posted by: macman
a reply to: FlyersFan
Well.....that would be racist.......................or bigoted.................or sexist............You just hate women, hate 0bama and are a homophobe.
Did you know this is all Bush's fault.
Which types of birth control are free? Birth control methods that are covered by this requirement of the Affordable Care Act include any that are approved by the FDA: Birth control patch Birth control pills Birth control ring (NuvaRing) Birth control shot (Depo-Provera) Cervical cap Contraceptive implant Diaphragm IUD Permanent contraception methods, such as tubal ligation, often called "getting your tubes tied" Emergency contraception (Plan B, Ella, and Next Choice) Your plan may also cover over-the-counter birth control, but you will need a prescription from your doctor if you want it to be covered without out-of-pockets costs.