It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: 74Templar
originally posted by: Astr0
originally posted by: aorAki
It's a goddamn rabbit hole....once in there's no way out!
I'm sold
You know a single sleeping person can run through a five month scenario set in just a two hour sleep? 'Sleep on it'. Lords, how the people would flip their # if they knew at night we basically tweaked them to work out our problems for us.
Ok, so I've been following this thread for a bit now, and this piqued my interest...
Without going into too much, what you're essentially saying here is you can use the subconscious portion of a regular person's brain as they sleep to basically figure advanced problems such as exotic flight and materials? And obviously using a 'bank' of sleepers this basically creates a system of great minds together so to speak to solve complex problems?
On a side note, this is one of the best threads I've followed so far, despite the breadcrumb trail regular joes like us have been left from you guys obviously in the know. Rarely a thread has left me anticipating a response, and although some of it is really out there, I really don't doubt a word of it. There are just too many respected members posting for it to be the stuff of fantasy.
originally posted by: MystikMushroom
The black smudge to the right is on the lens itself, all the photos taken with the Samsung have it. The "bug-ish" looking thing is what we were focusing our attention on. It did not look that blurry or "insect like" in the sky. It was clearly triangular in shape.
My first UFO photo out of approximately 60 photos and 5 minutes of video, and it looks like a bug. Go figure.
originally posted by: 3n19m470
a reply to: Astr0
Strictly self defense suite? No weapons? Ok, but a self defense weapon is still a weapon, right? You could just as easily manifest a plasma ball in the same spot where a tank, plane or human happens to be existing, right? Guys?
originally posted by: mbkennel
resurrecting an old thread....
a reply to: punkinworks10
Dancing slingshot lights?
My sci-fi X-Files hypothesis: It was only ever one object and one light source. The two (or more) lights spinning are an illusion, the result of gravitational lensing from the surrounding 'warp drive' field. The particular pattern seen depends on what the warp engine is doing and the relative position of source and observer.
Real "anti-gravity" doesn't look like hovering. It looks like inertial modification and gravitational lensing.
originally posted by: punkinworks10
originally posted by: mbkennel
resurrecting an old thread....
a reply to: punkinworks10
Dancing slingshot lights?
My sci-fi X-Files hypothesis: It was only ever one object and one light source. The two (or more) lights spinning are an illusion, the result of gravitational lensing from the surrounding 'warp drive' field. The particular pattern seen depends on what the warp engine is doing and the relative position of source and observer.
Real "anti-gravity" doesn't look like hovering. It looks like inertial modification and gravitational lensing.
HMMMMMMM
now that is an interesting notion, and it fits with some UFO sightings, and one well documented video from a us military installation. Witnesses report that the object "didn't seem to be in one place" but seemed to flicker about here and there.
originally posted by: punkinworks10
HMMMMMMM
now that is an interesting notion, and it fits with some UFO sightings, and one well documented video from a us military installation. Witnesses report that the object "didn't seem to be in one place" but seemed to flicker about here and there.
originally posted by: mbkennel
originally posted by: punkinworks10
HMMMMMMM
now that is an interesting notion, and it fits with some UFO sightings, and one well documented video from a us military installation. Witnesses report that the object "didn't seem to be in one place" but seemed to flicker about here and there.
Well, more realistically, that could also be optical stealth. The idea is to confuse the imaging sensors in the most advanced anti-air missiles: no pattern match to lock on to.
originally posted by: mbkennel
resurrecting an old thread....
a reply to: punkinworks10
Dancing slingshot lights?
My sci-fi X-Files hypothesis: It was only ever one object and one light source. The two (or more) lights spinning are an illusion, the result of gravitational lensing from the surrounding 'warp drive' field. The particular pattern seen depends on what the warp engine is doing and the relative position of source and observer.
Real "anti-gravity" doesn't look like hovering. It looks like inertial modification and gravitational lensing.
originally posted by: punkinworks10
The sighting I'm thinking of shows an object hovering, from a distance it appears to twinkle, but when zoomed in on and slowed down, it appeared to more of jump around from frame to frame, giving the twinkling appearance.
You know, if you can generate and manipulate a localized gravitational field, and the field is strong enough, everything inside the field is in its own frame of reference.
originally posted by: BASSPLYR
a reply to: Zaphod58
Shoulda just bombed the F117 anyways. THhy knew better than to be climbing all over a downed military aircraft like a stealth fighter.
originally posted by: Soloprotocol
originally posted by: BASSPLYR
a reply to: Zaphod58
Shoulda just bombed the F117 anyways. THhy knew better than to be climbing all over a downed military aircraft like a stealth fighter.
Yeah, just kill non combatants, mainly farmers and curious towns folk willy nilly. God forbid a large chunk of the highest tech aircraft doesn't land near you any time soon.