While there's absolutely no way anyone could convince the people on this board not to absolutely HATE everything that even remotely has to do with
this first family. (hell, most of these people believe that the president was born in Kenya for crying out loud)
There is a real easy way to refute or confirm this.
LOOK UP YOUR LOCAL SCHOOL LUNCH MENU!
It's online for everyone to see.
Of course if it's bad and can be painted with a wide brush on this administration, some people will believe anything!
I used to eat in the cafeteria. We didn't get served crap like that.
The MO lunch program looks like it is running as successfully as the ObamaCare rollout.
If the cafeteria at your school is serving crud, it has nothing to do with Michelle Obama and everything to do with your local school board. I can
tell you what they will say: they don't have enough money to provide food that is both healthy and appetizing. Of course, since you are so concerned
about the food served in your school's cafeteria, I am sure you will lead the charge to raise taxes to pay for them.
you are talking to people that are on a political rant against Obama. telling them that it has more to do with their local school boards, as well as
their local governments, spoils their narrative. you will not get through to them
It's about the caloric restrictions which were imposed. They laid severe limits on how much of the meal can be protein and how much must be
vegetable/fruit with a very tight upper limit on the meal as a whole.
The problem is that while the limit might be appropriate for an average adult, these are not average adults. Some of them are athletically active
kids. For them, this is a starvation diet and not healthy for their needs at all. But they're caught up in this one size fits all mentality.
My sister has three boys, and her two oldest love fruit and vegetables, but even so, they come home hungry every ... single ... day. What they get
can't even hold them over until supper with a modest snack.
And you can say pack their lunch, but increasing schools are either banning sack lunches or policing them to make sure they "comply" and are healthy
enough.
All First Ladies pick a "cause" during their husbands term(s).
Laura Bush chose literacy programs.
But unlike Laura Bush, who didn't tell children WHAT kind of books to read, Michelle Obama chose a program that enabled her to endorse a program to
tell what kind of foods to eat.
The schools here charge $180 per half of school year (once before winter break, once after) to pay for the crappy Obamateria food for your kid, and
you aren't allowed to send your own food with them..
I've been looking around at various opinion sites with some pretty damning photographs of this program. I am shocked.
What I didn't see was anything contrary to the substance of the OP. And, I didn't find how much MO's cause cost the taxpayer or if the ROI is
being met. On a positive note, the conservative base will have a far easier time recruiting from the pool of this emerging generation. I can hear it
now, "Hey ... you guys remember which party was responsible for your lunch menu back when you were in school?"
FWIW, they shut down the cafeteria at my kid's school some years back. I was quite surprised by that decision, but by then my kids were graduated
and gone. I'll have to ask some of the guys from the office about this tomorrow.
I wonder what poisons they put in our children's food? [GMO, Fluoride etc.]
I wonder why they are put there? [mind control, population control etc.]
I wonder who is responsible? [1st Lady, Monsanto, parents etc.]
I wonder when, where and how often the school food is tested for poisons?
I wonder when a large majority of people will feed and home school their children in self sufficiency and avoid the poisonous infection of the nanny
state into the family unit
I do not mean to be politically biased in any way here...but heres my take on the first lady having anything to do with how our country runs: They
were not elected to any office, they do not have any power via the constitution, nor via the people that voted their husband in. They should never be
taking vacations on the tax-payers dime unless they are accompanying the President who was elected, certainly not extended family ie her mom, I can of
course understand children.
The office of President is a role of public service, we pay them 400k a year, thats plenty of money to be able to budget their own family vacations,
the only added expense should be the presidents security and thats it. The office isnt supposed to be winning the lottery its supposed to be about
service and management of the Nation. I dont give a rats patooty about what any marriage partner to the President has to say regarding my personal
choices as who the hell are they? For that matter the President shouldnt be involved in our personal lives at all outside the context of that which is
required to run the country. All of these philosophical federal mandates are supposed to be taking place at a state level.
We have totally lost our bearings. Michelles opinion just as Laura Bushes, are just that, and shouldnt mean a damn thing to any of us outside of
another opinion. So why in the hell does she have anything to do with our school unch program? What are her credentials? Does she have a degree in
nutrition, dietetics, Naturopathy? What gives, I had to go to school and study Oriental Medicine to practice in my line of work. So if my wife is
elected president, should I have a hand in deciding the future regulations regarding how fast cars should be allowed to go on the highway?
This world, especially this country has gone far off the beaten path, and Michelle having anything to do with how my child is raised is ridiculous,
much less how she is fed. She holds NO OFFICE WHAT SO EVER.
There was a thread about this a long time ago about this scrappy lunch program, the bottom line is more and more schools are dropping the program
because they the school's are loosing money since the kids are not eating the food.
Example, my kids tried it but where coming home stuffing their faces, the so called lunches are proportionally served by age, also the food is
tasteless. I went to lunch with my kids looked at the menus figured brats, Apple crisp, whole wheat bun bun sounded good, but it was not, the brat
was some white tasteless thing that I would not call a brat it was boiled, the bun was some flat wheat bread thing and the Apple crisp was sliced
apples in ice.
I asked the principal of the school when was the last time he ate with the kids, he said he packs his own lunch. Asking my kids how many other
teachers eat with the kids he replied none.
School lunch program is Michelle Obama's way of keeping our kids from be coming obess and make healthy choices.
Bottom line the price for lunches gone up, the kids get half the amount of food, the school's are paying more to use the programs vendors for the
food and they are loosing money, you will hear about the farm program for schools but the school's say they can't afford them but they can afford
to buy skim milk for the kids but not whole milk, or chocolate milk.
There are more and more schools dropping the program because they are seeing the negative effects on the kids. Ask around talk to the kids or your
school, you will find your answers, the school's will be hard to get a strait answer.
edit on 6-4-2014 by 19KTankCommander because: auto correct
edit on 6-4-2014 by 19KTankCommander because: (no reason
given)
I agree. I was fine with her until she started moving her cause into the realm of actual regulation. No one gave her the authority to do that. I
don't recall her name on the ballot.
Imagine the outcry if Laura Bush had started telling the Dept. of Ed. to mandate certain amounts of time for reading and selecting the books that
would be read?
School lunch program is Michelle Obama's way of keeping our kids from be coming obess and make healthy choices.
And this is another problem - All the kids know this is about getting them to eat healthy and now for many the healthy food they are exposed to tastes
like crap when it doesn't have to. How many of those kids are going to ever want to eat healthy again?
School lunch program is Michelle Obama's way of keeping our kids from be coming obese and make healthy choices.
Beez probably hit the nail on the head when he called it 'a cause.' Sounds nobel almost, doesn't it?
I've been overseas about a quarter of a century. I assume you've done your fair share of time beyond our borders yourself. I think people can
knock our dietary standards, but other countries can hardly compare themselves to the physical stature of Americans anymore. I see more and more
warriors who dwarf me @ 6'1" at an ever increasing pace. How can this be bad? Who is MO to try and reduce this trend?
I don't think American kids would be so darned fat if they got out of the house like we did when I was a child.
And, I think OpinionatedB nailed something on page 1: What's really healthy about what is being served. Something definitely seems to be missing,
doesn't it?
Ok, here's the thing, "The Blaze" is Glenn Beck's personal garbage dump for all hate against the left. So, to use that site as the SOLE reference
to this is absolutely stupid.
You can go look up your local school lunch menu and decide for yourself if this is bullcrap or not.
I did, here's the school lunch menu for one of the schools in my county:
The whole month, no gruel, no baloney and cheese handed to you with no bread.
If Glenn Beck's site is going to make garbage up. Least they can do is make up believable garbage. I mean cmon, I get it, you all have an agenda.
It's fine, we understand. But you hurt your own idiotic cause by trying to put forth these IDIOT MORONIC STUPID things that have absolutely NO basis
in reality.
How does this keep happening? How do you go on time and time again getting pimp slapped by reality and still think you are on the right side of an
argument?
Here it is, look it up for your county, look it up for your city. It's available online for free! You have the internet, it's obvious, so there's
no excuse why you can't just look it up for yourselves and see whether or not the information is even remotely valid or not before you start spouting
of idiocy without any relevant data to back it up!
It's really got to be a sad existence to live in a life where you wake up every single day, turn on FOX News, be told what to think and who to hate,
and then have reality come down on you like a ton of bricks nearly EVERY SINGLE TIME!
Really? Do you people wake up in the morning for two minutes of hate as an exercise on Fox and Friends? (I don't know, I don't watch Fox and
Friends, is that a typical morning lineup for them?)
But here it is, another thread so easily debunked it's not even funny. But yet it goes on? Why? Why dupe yourselves so easily? Why? Is it that hard
to come up with real reasons why this administration isn't very good?
I know going outside your comfort zone is a hard thing, it's stressful. And sometimes low hanging fruit is easy to take. But just every once and a
while try and stop to think, "Maybe I should fact check this to see if it has anything to do with reality or if it's just the
insane ramblings of a syphilitic brain that is Glenn Beck!"
Just to reassure you, the video in the above link did not actually happen! Relax, put the gun down, it's ok, come back from the
doomsday bunker, put down your bug out bag. It's ok.
Just like "The Blaze" article, it's not real. Look it up for yourself, and see Michelle Obama isn't out to feed our kids a starvation diet to
weaken them for the coming muslim fascist socialist holocaust.