It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Agent_USA_Supporter
reply to post by cosmonova
Even to this day Serbs in Belgrade are dying at an alarming rate as the results of those beloved NATO air bombing that has left over after the war, even healthy born babies dont live very long in Belgrade. As the result of the bombing the spread of cancer has increased.
This is the kind of NATO that some are defending here.edit on 30-3-2014 by Agent_USA_Supporter because: (no reason given)
cavtrooper7
You'd better be glad about Cp. Bondsteel that big old bear is growling hungry again...
hounddoghowlie
show of hands, how many of you guys got a poster of slobydon hanging over your bed and go to sleep with the serbian national anthem playing on your ipod.
you guys are almost as bad as the taliban supporters. pfft.
cosmonova
I like when someone enter discussion with solid arguments. Anything else constructive to add?
Do you support what NATO did in Yugoslavia?
What is slobydon by the way?
cosmonova
NATO agression in numbers :
paraphi
cosmonova
NATO agression in numbers :
When you uncork the bottle and all that. Regardless of the numbers, NATOs intervention stopped Serbian aggression in its tracks. Literally. NATO did the job the UN had tasked them to do. The aggression ended and peace was imposed.
Regards
paraphi
cosmonova
NATO agression in numbers :
When you uncork the bottle and all that. Regardless of the numbers, NATOs intervention stopped Serbian aggression in its tracks. Literally. NATO did the job the UN had tasked them to do. The aggression ended and peace was imposed.
Regards
cosmonova
NATO had no approval by UN Security Council, once again, I do not know why are you repeating 'UN has tasked them to do'.
That is absolutely incorrect.
It was an open agression on sovereign country, the same thing happened in Iraq and Lybia.
Those are facts.
Also, how can Serbia be an aggressor on its territory, protecting its sovereignity from separatists in Kosovo?
It was the rightful thing to do.
Do you think US would let separatists inTexas to ever use force in obtaining their goals?
And to get back to main reason for NATO agression, Camp Bondsteel, strategic US base, the largest in Balkans.
'Wag the Dog 'was just standard story (read genocide, rapes,blah blah) to justify said aggression.
cosmonova
NATO had no approval by UN Security Council, once again, I do not know why are you repeating 'UN has tasked them to do'.
That is absolutely incorrect.
AngryCymraeg
cosmonova
NATO had no approval by UN Security Council, once again, I do not know why are you repeating 'UN has tasked them to do'.
That is absolutely incorrect.
It was an open agression on sovereign country, the same thing happened in Iraq and Lybia.
Those are facts.
Also, how can Serbia be an aggressor on its territory, protecting its sovereignity from separatists in Kosovo?
It was the rightful thing to do.
Do you think US would let separatists inTexas to ever use force in obtaining their goals?
And to get back to main reason for NATO agression, Camp Bondsteel, strategic US base, the largest in Balkans.
'Wag the Dog 'was just standard story (read genocide, rapes,blah blah) to justify said aggression.
So ethnic cleansing is just fine and dandy? I'm not saying that the KLA were saints, they could be every bit as brutal as the Serbs. However, the Serbs had the tanks and their version of ethnic cleansing was even more heavy-handed then their brothers had been in Croatia and Bosnia.
paraphi
cosmonova
NATO had no approval by UN Security Council, once again, I do not know why are you repeating 'UN has tasked them to do'.
That is absolutely incorrect.
Sometimes I despair at people's blind observance to a made up world view. The past is well documented.
Try the following. If you don't like the source then look up the UN. If you don't like the UN then methinks you'll never move forward.
UN Resolution 1244
www.nato.int...
All UN Resolutions pertaining to Yugoslavia et al
www.nato.int...
Regards
paraphi
cosmonova
NATO had no approval by UN Security Council, once again, I do not know why are you repeating 'UN has tasked them to do'.
That is absolutely incorrect.
Sometimes I despair at people's blind observance to a made up world view. The past is well documented.
Try the following. If you don't like the source then look up the UN. If you don't like the UN then methinks you'll never move forward.
UN Resolution 1244
www.nato.int...
All UN Resolutions pertaining to Yugoslavia et al
www.nato.int...
Regards
cosmonova
Lol I made a topic about NATO agression on Yugoslavia and you want me to read NATO justification for agression on NATO website.
Show me a documemt from UN Security Council that authorised NATO to attack Yugoslavia.
cosmonova
Once again please open another topic if you want to discuss Bosnia and Croatia.
By the way, Croatia 1995, 'Oluja' ring a bell? 250,000 Serbs expelled from Croatia in 2 days.
In regards to Kosovo, ethnic cleansing has started a long before 1999, late 70' and early 80' Serbs were being expelled from Kosovo.
That is a time when Separatist movement for independent Kosovo step up.