It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
victor7
You want to stir more trouble? How about Russia shuts down oil and gas to selected nations in Western Europe.
Result would be....................harsh cold winter and economic depression in Western Europe atleast........all for Ukraine??? don't think so !!edit on 1-3-2014 by victor7 because: (no reason given)
DeadSeraph
reply to post by Xcathdra
It's obvious that you feel that Putin is the aggressor here and doesn't have a legitimate case. That is fine and you are entitled to your opinions. But what I am wondering is what you feel the solution is in this crisis? Are you suggesting that NATO should mobilize against Russia? That seems like a ridiculously stupid thing to do...
Appeasement, as some insist on, does nothing either.
DeadSeraph
I think your position is completely reasonable now that you have clarified it. I pretty much agree with you on everything you've said here, except that I do not view Putin as trying to re-establish the Soviet Union.
DeadSeraph
The other issue that I'm concerned about is that while I think you are right about the need for Russian troops to withdraw, if Russia feels it has a case (which it obviously does since it voted to authorize troop movements), how do you go about convincing them they need to honor their agreements? Doing so at the point of a gun is probably going to have the opposite effect and encourage a confrontation.
DeadSeraph
As for everything else you've stated, I think it is spot on. The Ukrainians need to consider letting the Crimea declare independence. The entire country might need to be redrawn, but the problem there is that western powers have stated that is an unacceptable outcome, as they are trying to protect their economic interests.
DeadSeraph
Edit:
Appeasement, as some insist on, does nothing either.
Military brinkmanship in this situation could have disastrous consequences for the entire world. The advent of nuclear weapons has changed the way geopolitics works. Terms like "appeasement" aren't as relevant today as they were in 1938, especially when the fate of our species and indeed our planet are at stake. Diplomacy is the only sane way to handle this.edit on 1-3-2014 by DeadSeraph because: (no reason given)
If a vote is held by the Ukrainian government, the west will accept the outcome. They have to as anything else would show they have no interest in the people or the country, but just the resources. While some think that is the west regardless, all the more reason to allow the decision to be made solely by Ukrainians. The issue I see is how to hold elections that are fair and free of outside influence / interference?
carewemust
Usually when one country acts really badly, as we've seen a lot of in recent years, the UN Security Council and/or NATO Security Council have an emergency meeting to discuss SANCTIONS of some kind. Is this the "punishment" that President Obama is threatening Putin with? ... Sanctions? If so, when is that emergency Security Council meeting? I've heard no mention of one with this "crisis".
-cwm
Redrussian
Now Russia will not hesitate in using nuclear weapons.
DeadSeraph
We have never forgotten what the nazis did in Russia.
DeadSeraph
Well ,it will be good retribution.
DeadSeraph
Whoever will come to us with a sword, from a sword will perish' Alexander Nevsky. So yes,please attack and assist the neo-nazis .Then see what happens .
reply to post by Xcathdra
I agree, but as I stated Russia holds the cards for de-escalation.
I agree, but as I stated Russia holds the cards for de-escalation. Russian actions also have the possibility of creating an atmosphere where former soviet republics will seek nuclear weapons as a deterrent to Russian aggression / influence / what have you. Even more so if the EU / West do nothing.
Diplomacy only works when all sides engage faithfully. Is that possible?