It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by SeekerofTruth101
1.) Could the Benghazi murders be avoided?
No. Because America does not control the terrorists, nor does the Libyan govt.
2. ) If America had opted out of UN resolution to wage war upon Gaddafi, would the ambassador's life be saved?
No. Radical militants will always blame USA either for helping or NOT helping, and targetting america, as it is the most powerful nation on Earth. Challenge the top, and those below will bow. Terrorists are only animals and think like animats that they are.
3.) Is Congress to be blamed for the continued farce about Benghazi when the country has more CRITICAL issues to resolve?
Most definately. It's a hell of a time to get moving on. Focus on finding the murderers, not trying to hope for a scandal to tear down the presidency whom was elected by the Majority. There are far more PRESSING issues upon americans, than an event that had already occured and can no longer be changed.
I can understand the extremist Tea party whom will put President Obama on the rack if he so much as accidently took a pen from a student seeking autographs when suddenly he had to attend to a major incident, with that pen.
'It's the principle, not the value' - the extremist Tea party will rant, and Republican join in as they are a vote bank and the opposition. Only human nature at work.
But the republicans CANNOT BE FORGIVEN if it continues on this destructive egoistical path to destroy the opposition - democrats, when there are far more critical issues to be resolved such as the economy and social expenditure to put every american back on his/her feet.
Elected representatives have an obligation to its elected and the majority of the american people, not to the party alone.
The Tea party are extremists and are only idiots well known by the majority. The Tea party hates the President and will do anything, even lie through their mouth to fool others, if it can get President Obama off his seat. This INSANITY has got to end. Tea party members are americans too, and need not go down this destructive path, out of petty emotions when the nation needs everyone to work together to resolve for more bigger issues than personal petty ones.
We were not prepared for defending the ambassador in Benghazi, even though:
1.We knew AQ was there.
2. We knew there were protests in other countries.
3. We knew that Sept. 11th should be a day of increased security
Put those all together and what would you do?????
Originally posted by cholo
reply to post by neo96
Seems to be pretty convienent that the GOP cuts funding to security and then uses a lack of security as a reason to hammer Obama.
That sounds like they designed the entire strategy.
Originally posted by macman
Not true.
Anyone that has ever been involved with military actions, knows that is not true.
A QRF could have been deployed to at least work on securing the compound. Use of SOFs have and could pick apart those terrorists.
Now, to secure the location for stable use, a battalion push could be used. But, to at least rescue those on teh ground, there are many other choices.
Originally posted by cholo
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
reply to post by cholo
It seems to be all about partisanship... Between 2000-2008 there were over 50 embassy attacks and over ten personell deaths, yet we did not here about them. Now, low and behold this one case is being used to propagate a political witch hunt.
I love to see you start a thread all your own and detail those 50 embassy attacks you spent a whole thread talking about the other night...before bailing off and vanishing. (?)
However, those happened under a different President. While I would love to see them investigated as well, they aren't the matter at hand ..today, and right now. Benghazi is. Perhaps they even tie in, at some point? The people working INSIDE the State Department are the same under Obama as they were under Bush. Civil servants don't change as Presidents do...and that IS the problem at the core of it, IMO.
Investigation needs to happen to determine who, outside the elected leaders, did what which caused good men to die. The questions of help denied, security refused and reinforcement requests simply ignored, all come into this as well. The hunt for WHO precisely made the decisions which caused this to happen are first and foremost though.
......and the majority of those people don't hold Office. They weren't elected.
Yes they happened under a different president, exactly why the GOP had zero interest in
Investigating or politicizing the events. You proved my point very well!
Originally posted by SeekerofTruth101
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
You're among a growing minority who believes that. As time goes on, the numbers continue to shift and it's not supportive to that line of thinking. The only way to begin to justify any of this is to point to other leaders like Bush....which is pointing to bad behavior in justifying one's own bad behavior. Relativism at it's worst.
A nation of law can't slide things that result in deaths by incompetence simply because other scumbags have managed to get away with it before. The problem then is going BACK to see those issues brought to light as well....not to whitewash what happens now and, presumably by that logic, whatever follows in the future.
Anarchy or Tyranny lay down that path...and in that context? They're equally bad places to go.edit on 16-5-2013 by Wrabbit2000 because: (no reason given)
You belong to the LOUD and VOCAL but MINORITY that concerns itself with partisan potitics as evident by your continued rants over the democrats and the president, regardless of what he had done.
YOu may hope that your foolish kind grows, but there are MORE americans whom are a heck lot more discerning, and have a wider perspective over events than the narrow ones that your kind possess.
The Benghazi case was an opened book, of unprecedented levels unheard of by other presidents. National security info is even allowed to be used in the Congress when it could have compromised the lives of agents, their methods and even the safety of the nation to enemies, all thanks to the continued time wasting by the unconscionable partisan republicans and the likes of you in USA.
THere is NO point in further slogging a dead horse. Lessons had been learnt over this issue that no american could have prevented. This is not the watergate scandal as the tea party had hoped. YOu are an american and your enemies - the terrorists whom had slaughtered the americans in Benghazi, are LAUGHING OUT LOUD at your kind as you focus on your leaders instead of on them. How more stupid do you want to be?
And yet, it is still not enough. It is never enough until your kind see the President toppled and the nation destroyed, all because of partisan motives, fooling the masses to NOT to think about the economy thanks to the belligerance of the republican party, when the economy is the MOST CRITICAL issue facing the nation today.
Cheers and continue with your foolish ranting and feign righteousness over the dead americans in blaming the administration while your enemies the terrorists are laughing behind your back at your kind's stupidity and harbor hopes that your kind continues to be stupid as they seek out more americans to slaughter.
Originally posted by soundguy
Am I the only one that will be glad when these ill informed delicate flowers on the right move on to the next over hyped made up crises?
edit on 16-5-2013 by soundguy because: Edited so I don't offend the most delicate among us.
Originally posted by HauntWok
Do you know who really is to blame for Benghazi? Who REALLY is to blame?
THE MILITANTS THAT ATTACKED THE EMBASSY AND KILLED THE PEOPLE!
Good lord, you people act as if the president himself went and shot them.
Stop listening to Sean Hannity and FOX News. Think for yourself. You all are supposed to be free thinkers right? How come I log on here every day to see Sean Hannity's words used as threads? These aren't the threads of free thinkers and people who are intelligent, these are the threads of parrots, trained parrots who use the words of others and the rage of others as their own.
You all have muddied the waters in this matter to the point of insanity.
edit on 16-5-2013 by HauntWok because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by HauntWok
reply to post by neo96
So then 8 months after the fact why are they still walking around instead of 6 feet under?
Because blaming people, and things are more 'important'.
Isn't that exactly what you are doing? Blaming the President for something instead of demanding Congress do something about it?
U.S. options to 'capture or kill' Benghazi suspects
The U.S. military has updated plans to "capture or kill" alleged perpetrators of the deadly terror attack on the American diplomatic compound in Benghazi, Libya, CNN has learned.
Originally posted by SeekerofTruth101
Originally posted by macman
Not true.
Anyone that has ever been involved with military actions, knows that is not true.
A QRF could have been deployed to at least work on securing the compound. Use of SOFs have and could pick apart those terrorists.
Now, to secure the location for stable use, a battalion push could be used. But, to at least rescue those on teh ground, there are many other choices.
Either your military experiences are gained through the gunsights or a pen in some HQ, or as a civilian clown like Hicks when it comes to military matters and deserved to be chewed up by the military authorities there when he panic and tried to flee Tripoli.
Spec Ops are small teams can can only be used for springing surprise - raids and ambushes upon a large enemy force, and NEVER to be used as conventional forces when the springing is done by the enemies and be overwelhemed sucidically and tragically.
They are not superman, more so in the face of war hardened vets jihadist terrorists by the hundreds. You need a battalion of marines to take them out effectively, and another diversion of troops to conduct room to room searches in Benghazi alone to flush out the actual culprits whom are never in uniform and blend in well hiding amongst the civilian population.
None knew what exactly happened during the first attack, as it coincided with mass protests in the arab world over the inflammatory video, and thus most presumed it must had been a violent religious anger that toppled the embassy and staff, until reports and evidences of a heavily armed assualt upon the embassy surfaced that more got a clearer picture. 'Pics or it didn't happened' applies in the real world just as here on ATS.
There was only a small spec ops team in Libya. It was a UN air cover support, and not invasion, and thus no country had or allowed 'thousands of boots on the ground' as the republican and their supporters hope to mislead.
The air support was miles away, and even then, who were the targets when the dead are already dead and terrorists hiding amongst civilians? Slaughter the civilian population with indiscriminate bombings? Are you nuts?
Send the small team uniformed spec ops to save the other 2 men still alive? And get them all slaughtered by the heavily armed terrorists hiding behind windows, even if the spec ops knew exactly where those 2 men were?
It is a dead horse. No sense in flogging it for unconscionable republican partisan BS. Realities speak for itself.
The most rational decision was made and more lives were saved than if Hicks was in charge. Civilians never made good battle commanders, as the peanut farmer Carter screwed up in the Iranian hostage debacle back in the 80s.
May the republicans and their supporters end the partisan BS, and focus on the ecomony and the american people instead. Such petty tactics will only hurt their re-election into the presidential and congress race. Not every american is an idiot to fall for or support such smear attempts.
Their continued voting record in Congress only shows they pushed only for party agendas, and not majority americans' interests as they are voted for. May they remember their vows to the majority, and the majority did vote for a democrat president by both electoral and popular vote. Logic, not loyalty to party, must rule, to help and uplift american people.
Originally posted by Kashai
reply to post by neo96
Excuse me but the refueling plane was not their. So in relation to the issue of what the difference is between BS and the bottom line? Why was the aircraft not available???
The rest is
Congress killed those people by cutting funding as sure as they has pulled the trigger.
Any thoughts?edit on 16-5-2013 by Kashai because: (no reason given)
Congress, specifically the GOP were also the ones who cut 300 M from Embassy Security.
Originally posted by Diisenchanted
reply to post by SeekerofTruth101
Your quote(But the republicans CANNOT BE FORGIVEN if it continues on this destructive egoistical path to destroy the opposition - democrats, when there are far more critical issues to be resolved such as the economy and social expenditure to put every american back on his/her feet.) This is just ridicules!
That is all crap and you know it. It is not the responsibility of the government to take care of the people. It is the responsibility of the people to take care of them selves. When people rely on the government to take care of them you end up like ( Just like the damn mess we are in now). A frikkin welfare state. moronic progressives . Then they blame everyone else for their mess. You can't feed everyone who won't get off their butts and work. The real problem is people who want a free ride and the leaders who promote it! Grow up and get a job.
edit on 17-5-2013 by Diisenchanted because: edit to add your quote