It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by sonnny1
Originally posted by redtic
I'm gonna sit back and let this little right-wing, orgasmic, jubilatory love-fest play itself out and then come back and laugh my azz off 6 months from now when *none* of these supposed scandals turn out to be anywhere near the scandal the right is trying to make them out to be.
Supposed?
Glad it wasn't your family killed and used to exploit Obama's reelection. Im sure you wouldn't have any problems with that.................
Originally posted by redtic
I'm gonna sit back and let this little right-wing, orgasmic, jubilatory love-fest play itself out and then come back and laugh my azz off 6 months from now when *none* of these supposed scandals turn out to be anywhere near the scandal the right is trying to make them out to be.
Originally posted by Def Youth
Lies, lies and damn lies? That's the Republicult motto.
Originally posted by Def Youth
Lies, lies and damn lies? That's the Republicult motto.
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
reply to post by TDawgRex
He went beyond the right/left thing shortly after getting to Office...if he'd ever actually followed it in his own mind, to begin with. It's hard to say as we're seeing it all start coming apart now.
Originally posted by HauntWok
reply to post by Xcathdra
See, now what I don't get is this.
So I have no clue why you guys are angry. (Oh wait, yes I do, cause FOX News tells you to be angry.)
So, let me try and understand. You aren't angry that the attack took place. (you all think it's just fine that someone attacked us because we have a democrat in office, so, it's ok that we were attacked, your not actually angry at those who attacked us, you probably would invite them to a BBQ if Obama got ousted as President because of their actions.)
You are angry because they investigated it? And there seems to be multiple reasons that security failed?
Is that right?
Originally posted by seamus
reply to post by neo96
IMO it boils down to two words:
"Stand Down".
Do we really need to look further?
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
As seekeroftruth pointed out in the beginning, they would have to send in at least a battalion sized force to deal with the terrorists and there would have been massive cassualties. T
Originally posted by macman
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
As seekeroftruth pointed out in the beginning, they would have to send in at least a battalion sized force to deal with the terrorists and there would have been massive cassualties. T
Not true.
Anyone that has ever been involved with military actions, knows that is not true.
A QRF could have been deployed to at least work on securing the compound. Use of SOFs have and could pick apart those terrorists.
Now, to secure the location for stable use, a battalion push could be used. But, to at least rescue those on teh ground, there are many other choices.
Originally posted by macman
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
As seekeroftruth pointed out in the beginning, they would have to send in at least a battalion sized force to deal with the terrorists and there would have been massive cassualties. T
Not true.
Anyone that has ever been involved with military actions, knows that is not true.
A QRF could have been deployed to at least work on securing the compound. Use of SOFs have and could pick apart those terrorists.
Now, to secure the location for stable use, a battalion push could be used. But, to at least rescue those on teh ground, there are many other choices.