It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ReadAwhile
Originally posted by DestroyDestroyDestroy
It's because the American people are afraid of their neighbors and fellow country men. Perhaps for a good reason. Irrational fear leads to irrational decision making.
A perspective from someone on the outside who may never come to understand an american fundamental, nor choose to try.
Originally posted by DestroyDestroyDestroy
reply to post by b3l13v3
Not entirely true; guns grossly simplify killing. While it's true that a person is often behind the gun, it is much more difficult (both physically and emotionally) to beat someone to death with one's own fists.
The only valid argument against gun control is that taking guns away from civilians enables the black market for guns to flourish. Furthermore, the guns purchased from the black market will most likely belong to criminals, not civilians.
There are plenty of counter examples to this line of thinking, however; look at countries where guns are outlawed; the crime rate tends to drop substantially when the average person doesn't have access to weapons.
Then again, the economic divide in said countries isn't anywhere near what it is in America.
Those countries may be subject to tyrannical reign, but we're already suffering from tyrannical reign and we have guns.
The problem lies within the cultural and economic divides in America; too much diversity creates a fractured society with no common ground. We're "Americans," but what does this really mean? There is no central American culture, unless we count Bibles, Guns, McWhoppers, and an unhealthy sense of entitlement and self-righteousness.
If there is no unifying force American society will remain fractured, and thus powerless against a central force such as the Federal Government. People are just too divided and self-centered to see the greatness of this country crumble around them.
I seriously think that many countries in the EU (save Greece and Italy) would be better places to live than modern America. Not just in terms of personal safety, but because the people aren't so clueless, powerless, and manipulable.
I mean look at how revolution in this country is treated; it becomes something to poke fun at and make a profit out of. Once revolution becomes commercialized, you know that nothing is going to spare you of the coming onslaught and destruction. People who want change need to throw out their TVs and computers, head to the streets, and let their distress be known. Keyboard Jockey-ism accomplishes nothing; allowed one's opinions to be swayed by the BS they spew in the MSM accomplishes nothing. Be wary of displaced anger and pointing fingers; the government is simply the whore, the real problems are the people who pay her. We can protest very effectively through boycott. For example, if you have a problem with major banks, withdraw your money from them. If you have a problem with a certain franchise, don't shop there. Lead by example and the sheep will follow. Doing nothing will yield nothing.
Then again, we're a bit beyond the boiling point; there is very, very, little which can be done now to prevent tyranny and economic devastation in America. Lean back in and enjoy the ride.
Originally posted by DocHolidaze
ive said this before and im sure many others have said this as well, ever since the dawn of time when we used rocks and bones for tools has man killed his fellow man, how is any kind of gun law going to change that truth?edit on 5-4-2012 by DocHolidaze because: (no reason given)edit on 5-4-2012 by DocHolidaze because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by DocHolidaze
ive said this before and im sure many others have said this as well, ever since the dawn of time when we used rocks and bones for tools has man killed his fellow man, how is any kind of gun law going to change that truth?
Originally posted by TsukiLunar
reply to post by Homedawg
"I have to be armed or the government will destroy us."
Not a very persuasive argument in my opinion because plenty of countries citizens are "unarmed" and they seem fine.
But, hey, in America we love guns. They can kill.
Originally posted by DocHolidaze
ur counter point that says its harder to kill without a gun is ridiculous, there are plenty of easier ways to kill than a gun(and more effeciet), so please dont use that as a counter point please it holds no weight
Originally posted by User8911
Originally posted by DocHolidaze
ive said this before and im sure many others have said this as well, ever since the dawn of time when we used rocks and bones for tools has man killed his fellow man, how is any kind of gun law going to change that truth?
So stupid design and evolution only in tools is how you view man...I dearly hope you are wrong.
I would be in favor of giving everyone a single six shooter pistol.
Originally posted by User8911
Originally posted by DocHolidaze
ur counter point that says its harder to kill without a gun is ridiculous, there are plenty of easier ways to kill than a gun(and more effeciet), so please dont use that as a counter point please it holds no weight
You seem like a nice guy, but I wouldn't debate much more if I was you.
What's more efficient? Atom bombs?
There is nothing more deadly in the hands of the average man than a gun, sure a katana blade might be more precise, silent and as deadly... in the hands of a PROFESSIONAL.
Someone on drugs or in madness isn't as dangerous with a katana than a gun and who kills the most people while wielding guns?
Drunks, drug addicts and emotionally deranged people.
Now, it's safe to say normal people need guns to protect themselves from crazy people...if that is actually mentally positive to have people living in fear.
Yes organized criminal will still have guns...do you regularly get problems with organized crime?
Do you think junkies and drug addicts could have easy access to guns when they cost so much in black markets?
Originally posted by TsukiLunar
reply to post by Homedawg
"I have to be armed or the government will destroy us."
Not a very persuasive argument in my opinion because plenty of countries citizens are "unarmed" and they seem fine.
But, hey, in America we love guns. They can kill.
The Second Amendment (Amendment II) to the United States Constitution is the part of the United States Bill of Rights that protects the right of the people to keep and bear arms. It was adopted on December 15, 1791, along with the rest of the Bill of Rights. In 2008 and 2010, the Supreme Court issued two Second Amendment decisions. In District of Columbia v. Heller (2008), the Court ruled that the Second Amendment protects an individual's right to possess a firearm, unconnected to service in a militia[1][2] and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home. In dicta, the Court listed many longstanding prohibitions and restrictions on firearms possession as being consistent with the Second Amendment.[3] In McDonald v. Chicago (2010), the Court ruled that the Second Amendment limits state and local governments to the same extent that it limits the federal government.[4]