It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by theubermensch
reply to post by Phantom28804
I found this to be probably one of the funniest headlines I have seen in awhile not to mention ironic.
I agree. They will increase the chocolate ration to 20 grams next.edit on 16-2-2012 by theubermensch because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by CALGARIAN
Originally posted by Unvarnished
Iran is too poor to make a nuke,
what does this even mean?
They are tens of thousands of missiles and were in the process, confirmed, of making new long range weapons..
Maybe not able to contain a large nuclear payload, but still.
The hardest, and most expensive, part of a nuclear weapon is creating a Nuclear Plant to enrich uranium and create plutonium... In which they have already made.
Funny, yet scary. I wonder how many people actually get that reference...
-----
I think this article is just hype. The Iranians have been releasing periodical announcements on their nuclear development for years now so it isn't really a shocking surprise or anything.
Originally posted by hoochymama
I thought they were going to blow up Israel any day now. The PTB are doing this right in front of our faces now. The Propaganda machine works both ways and I would bet 80% of Americans didn't even notice this so they will continue to blindly follow the marching orders of the UN and continue to place Sanctions (tool of War) which only incite more hatred to America and there so called Allies.edit on 16-2-2012 by hoochymama because: (no reason given)
I found this to be probably one of the funniest headlines I have seen in awhile not to mention ironic.
So the United States and Israel both claimed Iran was on the brink of a Nuclear weapon and must be stopped. Rattling sabres and beating on the war drums for a couple of months now at least. Talk of preemptive strikes, unexplained explosions, and even assassinations (which I actually thought was banned by the US itself).
Now all of a sudden Iran is embellishing their achievements in nuclear technology.
These articles are the ones that just make you go hmmm. When the same government claiming one thing suddenly turns around and contradicts itself. If we do end up at war with Iran. Then of course they will claim these articles never existed. Kind of like when Bush went from saying Iraq had WMD's to saying we never said they had WMD's.
Originally posted by Unvarnished
Iran is too poor to make a nuke,
Originally posted by Xcathdra
Originally posted by Unvarnished
Iran is too poor to make a nuke,
North Korea made one and test detonated it and they are much more worse off than Iran. Plus Iran has a bit better backing / relations with Russia and China than what North Korea does.
Russia / China - Husband and Wife of their family.
Iran - The troubled son
North Korea - The special son.
edit on 16-2-2012 by Xcathdra because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Dimitri Dzengalshlevi
How is Iran "troubled"?
Originally posted by Dimitri Dzengalshlevi
I don't see Iran doing anything wrong. Everything that they are doing, is legal. They are not enriching weapons-grade uranium,
Building facilities linked to their nuclear program without disclosing them BEFORE building - violation
Developing ballistic missiles with payload warhead capacity - violation
Being caught with programs whose only purpose is for nuclear weapons design / construction - violation
* - Highly enriched Uranium - 20% +
Originally posted by Vitchilo
The US government talking on both sides of their mouth...
One side they say Iran is a threat and about to destroy us all...
And on the other side they say Iran is hyping it all...
Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
reply to post by Xcathdra
Yeah, but those claims should have been added to the Iran is after nukes propaganda because the advancements Iran announced were better centrifuges. Those centrifuges would also be used in further enrichment for weapons just as much as the power program.
Grades
Slightly enriched uranium (SEU)
Slightly enriched uranium (SEU) has a 235U concentration of 0.9% to 2%. This new grade is being used to replace natural uranium (NU) fuel in some heavy water reactors like the CANDU. Costs are lowered because less uranium and fewer bundles are needed to fuel the reactor. This in turn reduces the quantity of used fuel and its subsequent management costs.
: Reprocessed uranium
Reprocessed uranium (RepU) is a product of nuclear fuel cycles involving nuclear reprocessing of spent fuel. RepU recovered from light water reactor (LWR) spent fuel typically contains slightly more U-235 than natural uranium, and therefore could be used to fuel reactors that customarily use natural uranium as fuel. It also contains the undesirable isotope uranium-236 which undergoes neutron capture, wasting neutrons (and requiring higher U-235 enrichment) and creating neptunium-237 which would be one of the more mobile and troublesome radionuclides in deep geological repository disposal of nuclear waste.
Low-enriched uranium (LEU)
Low-enriched uranium (LEU) has a lower than 20% concentration of 235U. For use in commercial light water reactors (LWR), the most prevalent power reactors in the world, uranium is enriched to 3 to 5% 235U. Fresh LEU used in research reactors is usually enriched 12% to 19.75% U-235, the latter concentration being used to replace HEU fuels when converting to LEU.
Highly enriched uranium (HEU)
Highly enriched uranium (HEU) has a greater than 20% concentration of 235U or 233U. The fissile uranium in nuclear weapons usually contains 85% or more of 235U known as weapon(s)-grade, though for a crude, inefficient weapon 20% is sufficient (called weapon(s)-usable);[2][3] some argue that even less is sufficient[citation needed], but then the critical mass for unmoderated fast neutrons rapidly increases, approaching infinity at 6%235U.[4] For critical experiments, enrichment of uranium to over 97% has been accomplished.[5]
The very first uranium bomb, Little Boy dropped on Hiroshima in 1945, used 64 kilograms of 80% enriched uranium. Wrapping the weapon's fissile core in a neutron reflector (which is standard on all nuclear explosives) can dramatically reduce the critical mass. Because the core was surrounded by a good neutron reflector, at explosion it comprised almost 2.5 critical masses. Neutron reflectors, compressing the fissile core via implosion, fusion boosting, and "tamping", which slows the expansion of the fissioning core with inertia, allow nuclear weapon designs that use less than what would be one bare-sphere critical mass at normal density. The presence of too much of the 238U isotope inhibits the runaway nuclear chain reaction that is responsible for the weapon's power. The critical mass for 85% highly enriched uranium is about 50 kilograms (110 lb), which at normal density would be a sphere about 17 centimetres (6.7 in) in diameter.
Later US nuclear weapons usually use plutonium-239 in the primary stage, but the secondary stage which is compressed by the primary nuclear explosion often uses HEU with enrichment between 40% and 80%[6] along with the fusion fuel lithium deuteride. For the secondary of a large nuclear weapon, the higher critical mass of less-enriched uranium can be an advantage as it allows the core at explosion time to contain a larger amount of fuel. The 238U is not fissile but still fissionable by fusion neutrons.
HEU is also used in fast neutron reactors, whose cores require about 20% or more of fissile material, as well as in naval reactors, where it often contains at least 50% 235U, but typically does not exceed 90%. The Fermi-1 commercial fast reactor prototype used HEU with 26.5% 235U. Significant quantities of HEU are used in the production of medical isotopes, for example molybdenum-99 for technetium-99m generators.[7]
Originally posted by PsykoOps
One thing I've always wondered about the Iranian nuclear program... How long would it take for Iran to develop from completely peaceful energy program to creating nukes?
If the time isn't that long and the efford to switch that big maybe that is the reason they're being constantly haunted for nuclear ambitions?
Originally posted by Xcathdra
reply to post by Dimitri Dzengalshlevi
The concern is Iran's ability to make a nuclear bomb. The concern stems from the centrifuges, which has been at the top of the concern list for years now, and the enrichment level, which is above the level needed for a civilian nuclear program. Their claim for enrichment to the 20% is for medical, yet that application doesn't require 20%
Iran continues to block access to certain site.
They built a secret enrichment location and got caught.
IAEA inspectors located software for nuclear explosion testing.
If their program is peaceful, why continue to to ignore IAEA requirements and inspections? As far as the comment on targeting their facilities. If the IAEA determines they are peaceful and not in violation, what good what it do for the US / Israel to attack it? Opinion would quickly favor the Iranian side since the IAEA report would go against the claims.edit on 18-2-2012 by Xcathdra because: (no reason given)