It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Rockpuck
reply to post by Peruvianmonk
squabbling over barren islands with a population of less than 3,000 people with a crappy climate in the middle of nowhere.
Very productive.
Originally posted by Rockpuck
reply to post by DAZ21
If I were forced to side with anyone it would be the Brits just because of the population. As far as I know anyways there was no indigenous population on the Islands, and the concept of Argentina only existed since 1816. Aside from the oil, of all the wars raging around the globe it's almost humorous to see two nations fighting over these little islands. I mean, if it was a tropical paradise with beautiful native women I'd understand! But the Falkland Islands seem to gloomy.
Originally posted by AngryCymraeg
There was an interesting article in the Guardian about a week ago that said that young Argentineans don't care about the Falklands, especially those that have been there and seen how British the place is. What makes me wonder is how many Argentineans actually believe that the plucky tango-crazy people of the Falklands are yearning for a return to Argentinean rule?
Originally posted by elpistolero1
Go Argentina!. the Malvinas will be Argentinian once again!!, screw the UK
Originally posted by JakiusFogg
reply to post by Rockpuck
Yeah can you believe it. We'll go to war for something that resembles the northern most tip of Scotland, but freely hand back Hong Kong!!!! ???? I don't get it either. Maybe we just feel an affinity for the place. Anywhere where is is cold windy and rains 364 days of the year MUST be British!
Originally posted by Rockpuck
reply to post by JakiusFogg
That's a good point.. even with the oil Hong Kong was worth more in terms of economic output. AND the folks in Hong Kong did NOT want to go back to China. I think that came down to Chinese interest though. Still, the UK should have held onto it like the USA holds on to Taiwan.
Originally posted by JakiusFogg
reply to post by Rockpuck
Yeah can you believe it. We'll go to war for something that resembles the northern most tip of Scotland, but freely hand back Hong Kong!!!! ???? I don't get it either. Maybe we just feel an affinity for the place. Anywhere where is is cold windy and rains 364 days of the year MUST be British!
Originally posted by JakiusFogg
reply to post by blueorder
Ever heard of a lease extension??
Originally posted by JakiusFogg
reply to post by blueorder
Ever heard of a lease extension??
Originally posted by mackey1224uk
Originally posted by Peruvianmonk
reply to post by mackey1224uk
Second, This ship This ship can track up to 300 targets and uses the sea viper missile. is a WMD........
The number of objects tracked has no relation to the number it can destroy in flight. All ships of this class can be overwhelmed by a missile barrage. You just need to fire one more missile than they can deal with. Still, it sounds cool1
P)
'