It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by IsraeliGuy
Although it would've been better if you lot hadn't rushed at me as if I insulted anyone.
Originally posted by IsraeliGuy
Why? Well it doesn't take a genius to tell this dot doesn't even move, it sits at the same spot while the camera itself is moving.
Originally posted by Paulos
Originally posted by IsraeliGuy
IMO this is obviously a camera side effect or a simple dot being edited in the video.
Why? Well it doesn't take a genius to tell this dot doesn't even move, it sits at the same spot while the camera itself is moving.
Sorry.
It does look strange but the camera isnt moving, the camera is still, its the moon thats moving. It looks to me that its stationary behind the moon and appears as the moon has past it. Also when it flickers and disappeares it reminds me of a ship accelerating into hyperspace.
since you've seen it so often, and obviously have access to the required equipment, would you be so kind as to record it for us so we can check it out as well? If it occurs as often as you claim, this could really be something worth investigating.
Originally posted by Human_Alien
Originally posted by IgnoreTheFacts
To me, it obviously looks no where close to the moon. The lack of focus and the fact that it shakes differently from the moon lets you know it was way closer than the moon or added in post.
If it was really recorded in camera, could easily be a reflection, even if the operator didn't see it in person.
So, be honest. Do you sit there for hours and hours trolling youtube for these useless videos? If you are so interested in what people think of these videos and personally like them yourself....why not spend a little time and money on learning about simple editing programs, photography and cgi? You can get plenty of free programs online to get you started, and it would help you to become a more intelligent poster.
Your post was not only uncalled for but a little venomous too.
I didn't realize we crowned a new ATS-Judge!
I must have missed your Coronation whilst busy 'trolling' for useless videos. My bad!
Originally posted by tombangelta
reply to post by Human_Alien
seriously not worth the time it took to skip to 1:42
Originally posted by Trueman
Sorry, but I believe you both are wrong.
The moon is moving and the camera too, since the camera is on planet Earth, wich is moving too like any other planet.
Originally posted by Human_Alien
Originally posted by heineken
is it only me or there was whats look like an acceleration
I don't see that at all.
The ONLY thing that rings suspicious to me is....why was he video taping the left side of the Moon? I mean, wouldn't you think you'd have that baby smack in the middle of the view finder? Unless of course, he zoomed in on it afterward to broadcast and show case his findings on YouTube.
I think I'll pay him a little visit via email and see if he wants to join us to explain!
•In theory, the terminator is close to a great circle at 90° from the solar direction. However it is not a sharply-defined line: first because the Sun has a finite width (of about 0.5° as seen from the Moon); and second because variations in the surface topography cause some high points to catch light well beyond the theoretical limit, and some low spots to be in shadow well before it. As a consquence, the observed terminator is a broken patchwork of isolated areas of light and shadow.
Originally posted by IgnoreTheFacts
To me, it obviously looks no where close to the moon. The lack of focus and the fact that it shakes differently from the moon lets you know it was way closer than the moon or added in post.
If it was really recorded in camera, could easily be a reflection, even if the operator didn't see it in person.
So, be honest. Do you sit there for hours and hours trolling youtube for these useless videos? If you are so interested in what people think of these videos and personally like them yourself....why not spend a little time and money on learning about simple editing programs, photography and cgi? You can get plenty of free programs online to get you started, and it would help you to become a more intelligent poster.
Originally posted by Shuzitzu
Well its obviously moon swamp gas.... How did you guys not even think of that possibility!
Originally posted by planetzog
reply to post by IsraeliGuy
The pictures you show actually strengthen the argument that something is going on up there.
Originally posted by Human_Alien
Originally posted by IsraeliGuy
Same effect on two different videos.
Same camera effect.
Could be. Could be the same anomaly too.
Glad you have strong convictions but there's just no way of proving it.
Originally posted by badw0lf
Originally posted by planetzog
reply to post by IsraeliGuy
The pictures you show actually strengthen the argument that something is going on up there.
They do nothing of the sort.
It's a camera artefact, the dot does not move in relation to the camera, and as the camera is motionless, you'd expect that the dot if it were a UFO or some other body in orbit around the moon, would not remain FIXED in EXACT relation to the camera lens.
Surely it would move free of where the camera is? Surely it would move in relation to the orbit it is in, being the moon?
No, it remains exactly in position. Does not deviate. And then once the moon has moved enough for the darkness of space to flood the artefact, it flickers out.
Originally posted by badw0lf
Originally posted by Human_Alien
Originally posted by IsraeliGuy
Same effect on two different videos.
Same camera effect.
Could be. Could be the same anomaly too.
Glad you have strong convictions but there's just no way of proving it.
Well, sure... But it seems it's well within reason to conclude that 'something is definitely going on up there' using the same amount of inconclusive evidence, when reason and logic should help people conclude it indeed appears to be an artefact/camera fault.
if it moved, I'd be more likely to stay on the side of hopefulness for this, but it doesn't. It has all the characteristics of what IsraeliGuy says, which I agree with.