It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by KilluminatisRex
Oh man you are racsist as #, and I can see it in all of your comments.
Originally posted by Sonya610
The Pharmacist hero (also a veteran with a permanent disability do to his service) that defended his life and that of two other employees during a vicious armed robbery is being charged with murder.
This is shameful, when armed intruders threaten your LIFE with guns, and actually shoot at you, it is murder to shoot them back? I think not.
The police would have done exactly the same thing. He shot the kid once in the head (a kid that supposedly was carrying a gun) and left him but when the kid started to get up he shot him 5 more times. That is proper procedure, if the kid was armed he was still posing a threat to the Pharmacist and the lives of the other employees. Doesn't matter if the kid was on his back, the kid raised his head and attempted to get up (either to flee or to carry on the armed assault) which made him a THREAT to be taken down.
The fatal shots are not only sensible, but quite reasonable. Perhaps if the thug (or is the term "teenager"? that sounds sooo much less threatening)had not tried to rob innocent people he would still be alive today!
I sincerely hope the Jury (or Judge) has enough sense to let this man GO FREE. He did the right thing! Besides the perpetrator was out of camera shot so it is reasonable to assume he may have been raising his weapon again to shoot.
** See article for actual video of the shooting **
www.kfor.com
(visit the link for the full news article)
[edit on 28-5-2009 by Sonya610]
Originally posted by arbiture
I think we need to add a psychological componant to any background check. Let the people with legitamite reasons, such as dangerous environments have the right to pack. But there must be some degree of evaluation of those who want to hall around a gun. May I suggest a Taser? It hurts but is not likely to kill you.
Originally posted by arbiture
With the "tunnel vision" one gets in combat and other very high stress situations, you can have any restraint thrown out the window. I support the right to keep and bare arms, to a point. Since among other things individuals are more likely to shoot themselves or others by accident, we need some rational ideas in this area.
Originally posted by blackrain17
reply to post by MrXYZ
I hope one day you get robbed at gun point and for them to shoot you several times and leave you paralyzed. Or have armed robbers invade your home and shoot you couple times, kill your loved ones, and see if you keep the same beliefs.edit on 2-6-2011 by blackrain17 because: Your views won't change unless if it happens to you...
Originally posted by MrXYZ
Originally posted by blackrain17
reply to post by MrXYZ
I hope one day you get robbed at gun point and for them to shoot you several times and leave you paralyzed. Or have armed robbers invade your home and shoot you couple times, kill your loved ones, and see if you keep the same beliefs.edit on 2-6-2011 by blackrain17 because: Your views won't change unless if it happens to you...
So if you are ever forced to shoot someone, and that guy is bleeding on the floor...you slowly and calmly walk into the back room, grab another gun, and then stand over that guy and shoot him 5 (!!!) times...and then call it "self defence"?? Really?
Thanks for proving my point that some people shouldn't be allowed to own guns, because they obviously have no clue about laws. You might wanna look up the definition of self defence, because you obviously have no clue about it. Shooting someone 5 times when he's already down isn't self defence, and "adrenalin flowing" isn't an excuse. If you can't handle the pressure of owning a gun, and correctly using it, you shouldn't own one in the first place.