It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Photo of a pulse detonation engine in action

page: 1
0

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 6 2003 @ 05:48 PM
link   
Here is a photo of a pulse detonation in action:




photo of the engine:



For more info go to www.popsci.com...

[Edited on 6-9-2003 by jetsetter]



posted on Sep, 6 2003 @ 05:54 PM
link   
OK, I believe that pulse detonation-jet hybrids will become the engines of the future for aviation. What do you guys think?



posted on Sep, 6 2003 @ 10:39 PM
link   
Jetsetter.....I believe and its of my own opinion that this engine type is already in use.

regards
seekerof



posted on Sep, 6 2003 @ 10:55 PM
link   

Originally posted by Seekerof
Jetsetter.....I believe and its of my own opinion that this engine type is already in use.

regards
seekerof


Yeah, like i said in ATS chat allready.. about 12h earlier: V-1 had "pulse-engine".



posted on Sep, 6 2003 @ 10:57 PM
link   
That wasn't really a real pulse detonation engine.



posted on Sep, 6 2003 @ 10:59 PM
link   
And I wasn't refering to the V-1 either....


regards
seekerof



posted on Sep, 6 2003 @ 11:02 PM
link   
I think you are talking about the Aurora spy plane. I dont think thoughs donut on a rope contrails are from a pulse detonation engine. I believe the type of engine that the Aurora would use would leave a contrial with the donuts alot closer toghther. The pulse detonation fires at about 80 times a second.



posted on Sep, 7 2003 @ 01:27 AM
link   

Originally posted by jetsetter
That wasn't really a real pulse detonation engine.


PULSE ENGINE, IS A PULSE ENGINE. "Tech" of that pulse is secondary.


I really dont give a..


*note*

Btw.. one would think that a rocket engine would be much more useful, as it doesnt give "80 detonations per sec" but continiuos trusht..


[Edited on 7-9-2003 by FULCRUM]



posted on Sep, 28 2003 @ 07:36 AM
link   
ACtually it's much better to have pulse detonations. More power.

Even the Nazi's knew this. They had an engine that fired repeatedly over and over again.....



posted on Sep, 28 2003 @ 10:23 AM
link   
Pulsing likely means more fuel efficiency too, therefore more range.

It may also mean an engine that has a longer life, eg. less stresses?

does anyone know if this is the case?



posted on Sep, 28 2003 @ 11:10 AM
link   

Originally posted by THENEO
Pulsing likely means more fuel efficiency too, therefore more range.

It may also mean an engine that has a longer life, eg. less stresses?

does anyone know if this is the case?


How would a pulsing-type of thrust induce less stress on an engine? If anything, there would be more stress induced from the constant intertial changes that wouldn't be present under constant-thrust circumstances.... i.e. me smacking your back 80 times a second to move you hurts a lot less than me just pushing you.



posted on Sep, 28 2003 @ 09:42 PM
link   
Yeah that's right! Why let the government guys and the corporate geeks have all the fun.


HOMEMADE JET1


HOMEMADE GAS TURBINE ENGINES


THE JUNKYARD TURBOJET



posted on Feb, 26 2009 @ 05:12 PM
link   
I live in Rio Vista Ca. I looked up and saw some strange contrails , nothing the likes I've never seen before. About a dozen puffs in a line from large to large to small from north to south over Travis A.F. base. I did'nt hear or see any thing !!!!!This happenin Oct. Any body know about IT?



new topics

top topics



 
0

log in

join