"We are just here to collect all the garbage we left lying around. Sorry about that."
or
"Well, we've looked everywhere else, keep your eyes open for the Epstein list, it's gotta be here."
or
"Mankind has extended its reach to our neighboring planet, we have moved our minds to go beyond our homeplace, and in this endeavor we humbly proceed
with hope and encouragement that we may continue to grow and thrive in peace, harmony, and beauty. We come to seek wisdom, and more fully partake in
the glory of our universe."
a reply to: Potlatch --- how about "We're baaaack!" That's a reference to the US-published book "The Key" by Whitley Strieber
(published by Walker&Collier, NY:NY), which claims that sentient beings from Earth ended the Mars civilization 300 million years ago. Earth
scientists just recently verified that traces of two nuclear explosions have been found on Mars from about that time period; it's rather
straightforward to be able to place an accurate date on ancient nuclear explosions.
Darn got beaten to the joke by Daalder haha still a good one.
You know a day and night cycle just like earth's and it may once have hosted warmer temperatures, a thicker atmosphere and actual oceans as well as a
full weather cycle and seasons, something bad happened there though even if we did not come from there it may still have hosted life and just maybe an
intelligent race who got nuked from space or nuked themselves into oblivion.
And I for one anyway am completely convinced that someone destroyed the face on mars in order to cover up after the feature raised so much public
interest, who could possibly want to cover up and why?, power, control and of course lost science and technology's that they may have wanted to
monopolize and to keep out of others and OUR hands.
The claim in that video above that nature has shown that it can create it's own nuclear reactors is simply NOT true, it is a THEORY based on the
deposits of depleted uranium from Oklo, a nuclear reaction that not only worked very well indeed but seems to have sustained far longer than is
plausible for a natural reactor to ever have been able to, for HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF YEARS in fact, rivers change course over such a time period,
climates change over such a time period but this was still in operation, now while any buildings and equipment have long since decayed into nothing as
it is about two billion years old this ancient reactor in Africa is far from proven to be a natural feature it is only THEORIZED as such since to
suggest there was intelligent design at work is very unpalatable indeed to the scientific community.
So take that claim it is a natural reactor with a large pinch of salt, see there reason for WANTING to claim that it is for what it is an example of
Occam's razor using the faulty reasoning of taking THEORY as FACT that there were no intelligent beings doing it and therefore it had to be
natural.
And look at the dates it was in operation, the snow ball earth period which lasted from about 2.2 billion years ago to about as recently as 550
million years ago during which there were SUPER ICE AGES on earth when even the equator froze over several times, this was in operation during that
period in fact it was in operation during the early phase of that period for HUNDREDS of thousands of years, a period when oftentimes the water would
have been frozen, the surface glaciated and so how could it carry natural deposits of Uranium ore into a nice neat pile were it could then reach
critical mass and naturally undergo a fission reaction, it is less likely that this was a natural reactor than that it was probably an artificial
construction and all we are seeing is the left over remains of the facility, i.e. it's spent fuel.
edit on 27-1-2023 by LABTECH767 because: (no reason given)