originally posted by: PAUL35791
I would call you David Attenborough but he was convinced way back of the existance of BF by mountaineers like Shipton.
Being convinced of something doesn’t make that something real though. You’re the one who rants on for 6 pages about “legal evidence” yet
haven’t shown any. Sorry, but you can’t cross examine a YouTube video. It’s inadmissible, therefore not legal evidence of anything other than
people can make videos claiming whatever they like and post it to YouTube. And I’ve gone through all of the videos you’ve posted so far and not a
single one shows a Sasquatch. Noises off camera that are narrated as though it’s definitely Sasquatch, but none of that is even close to meeting
the threshold for burden of proof that erases reasonable doubt.
Granted the Giant comment is purely my opinion based on little evidence such as local accounts of them along with the second hand Military
testimonies and other factors.
At least in this instance you admit that you don’t have anything resembling evidence to support it.
PS Argument to the man, or Strawman, is an Ad Hominem and therefore fallacious argument.
Sure. Except I didn’t actually utilize a straw man argument nor did I levy an ad hominem attack upon you (they’re 2 different things). To do so,
I would have to intentionally misrepresent your claims. I did nothing of the sort. Nor was I attacking the character, motive, or any other attribute
of you personally. For someone sorry amped up on “legal evidence” you’re really not much for the fine details.
That's one Hominem you clearly aren't a world expert in.
I studied Hominids. Not Hominem’s. FYI... the above comment is an example of an ad hominem attack on me.
RE: I never stated I believe in the Neanderthal Predation Theory.
Yet you pushed the idea in several posts. Whether you believe it or not isn’t the point. I was addressing the legitimacy of the “theory”, not
you or your personal thoughts on the topic. So again, not a straw man or ad hominem despite the ones you directed at me in your own replies. You wear
hypocrisy like a finely tailored suit.
It is a Theory popular with the Pro Kill people who walk around the woods armed to the teath to wipe them out.
It’s not a theory. Period. And anyone who buys into it is willfully ignorant.
PPS You seem to have forgotten the small detail of Legal Evidence.
No, you simply neglected to provide anything that resembles evidence that would Be accepted in a court room. Calling it legal evidence does not make
it so. You’re neglecting the all important details of burden of proof and reasonable doubt. There’s so much reasonable doubt in the way you put
forth your take on the topic that no jury is going to agree with you.
Clearly Science is a Public Institute and has no authority to study or declassify subjects outside its remit, despite the claims of Professors
like Brian Sykes.
That’s not your call to make. If there is still a large enough breeding pool world wide for the species to continue while devoid of genetic
diversity, you really need to study biology, paleontology and Anthropology a little more to see what we
Can and can’t study. Or do you have a legitimate background in related subject matter as opposed
To a doctorate of YouTubing?
Militarised Science involves signing non disclosure, defence and secrecy papers. None of the TV Scientists have ever worked for the Military,
so they are only guessing that nothing could possibly be classified from them.
Well you’re in luck today. Not only do I have a background in paleoanthropology, but I was also in the military. Do I need
To show my DD-214? Just to be clear, you’re wrong.
All the evidence shows the Bigfoots and Werewolves are there and numerous dissident PhDs state the same.
Then why aren’t they cited? You make extraordinary claims. You require extraordinary evidence to support those claims.
Appealing to Authority is clearly fallcious. The Peer Reviewed Medical Journal Lancet claimed Hypnotism was a
stage act using a paid audience.
Again, for someone ranting and raving about valid legal evidence, you haven’t supplied a single citation (YouTube is not a citation) to support your
The DNA sequencing for The Sasquatch Genome Project was done with Donations and Independant of any subjective pseudoskeptical mainstream
beliefs. The 110 sequences demonstrated Sykes claims were wrong. sasquatchgenomeproject.org...
Well I’ll be damned, An actual citation!!!! Though I was hoping for something a little more professional looking as opposed to a circa 1999 Yahoo
geocities website. What’s your point though? The Human Genome Project was funded privately as well before they went public with their stock. I know
this because my mother in law was the VP of Human Resources up until they went public. And they have a website that doesn’t look like a child put it
together hopped up on adhd meds. But...to be entirely fair, I’ll reserve judgment until after I have a chance to go through more of the site.
However, from what I’ve looked at thus far, it’s looking a little sketchy.
edit on 1-9-2019 by peter vlar because: (no reason given)