It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
A person's right to air grievances without fear of retribution or censorship is fundamental to democracy in the United States. Free expression of one's beliefs is encoded in the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which generally protects free speech, freedom of religion, freedom of the press, and freedom of assembly. Protesting -- the time-honored practice of publicly speaking out against perceived injustices and urging action -- is a form of assembly and thus protected by the Constitution. But while there is a right to peaceful protest in the U.S., "peaceful" being the operative word, there are limits.
originally posted by: kaylaluv
originally posted by: matafuchs
a reply to: kaylaluv
Then WTF is it about? Please tell us oh wise one?
All I'm saying is, if they were protesting gun control legislation, or the removal of "God" from public places, you guys would be all for it.
originally posted by: burgerbuddy
He might let me hit him once or twice but i bet he'd knock me out in the 7th.
originally posted by: kaylaluv
originally posted by: matafuchs
a reply to: kaylaluv
Then WTF is it about? Please tell us oh wise one?
All I'm saying is, if they were protesting gun control legislation, or the removal of "God" from public places, you guys would be all for it.
originally posted by: dwaynedabigguy
a reply to: matafuchs
Is There a Right to Peaceful Protest?
A person's right to air grievances without fear of retribution or censorship is fundamental to democracy in the United States. Free expression of one's beliefs is encoded in the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which generally protects free speech, freedom of religion, freedom of the press, and freedom of assembly. Protesting -- the time-honored practice of publicly speaking out against perceived injustices and urging action -- is a form of assembly and thus protected by the Constitution. But while there is a right to peaceful protest in the U.S., "peaceful" being the operative word, there are limits.
And if you look on same page..it gives limits of what can be done and nothing in there states that professional sports players cannot kneel.
I hope the players take the NFL to court for this and let them know their right to protest is protected by the constitution.
Screw the republican party and their faux outrage. Black people have the same rights as other American whether they be professional athletes or not.
originally posted by: UnBreakable
Goodell’s decision is all financial. The NFL is losing ratings and revenue. The almighty dollar outweighs the social statement being made. The main reason people stopped watching is because of the kneeling. That being said, I totally agree with this decision. If the players want to draw attention to themselves during the anthem, just raise a fist while standing like that guy in the ‘68 olympics.
originally posted by: TinfoilTP
Nobody wants to watch a bunch of crybaby SJW's put on tights and pretend to be tough. They ruined the game forever, fans don't forget.