Are The "Trump Tapes" Fake or Not!?

a reply to: DJW001

The danger is not that the media will use false images to deceive citizens. That has always been done. The danger is that the knowledge of these technologies will cause people to reject the truth. That is clearly the intent of this thread.

The aim of this thread was and always was to wake people up to the level of technology to fool them. Start thinking and stop showing your bias. ATS posters are too smart to fall for your decisive excrement.

originally posted by: thepixelpusher
a reply to: DJW001

The danger is not that the media will use false images to deceive citizens. That has always been done. The danger is that the knowledge of these technologies will cause people to reject the truth. That is clearly the intent of this thread.

The aim of this thread was and always was to wake people up to the level of technology to fool them. Start thinking and stop showing your bias. ATS posters are too smart to fall for your decisive excrement.

Funny. I thought the title.of the thread was 'Are the 'Trump tapes' fake or not? " Thank you for calling me decisive! As I.pointed out, the technology is irrelevant; it is allowing confirmation bias to color your perceptions that is the problem. Trump could slap.some of his supporters in the face and they would swear it never hapened.

a reply to: DJW001

Still buthurt Hillary lost!? I hear the HRC Tape is coming sooner than any Trump tape.

originally posted by: thepixelpusher
a reply to: DJW001

Still buthurt Hillary lost!? I hear the HRC Tape is coming sooner than any Trump tape.

You need to get past your black and white binary thinking if you are going to understand the world. I did not support Clinton, I urged voters to seize the moment and vote third party. I am, however, disgusted that a man with little intelligence and a known criminal record could not only be elected President, but actually be defended and protected by most of his party.

As for a Clinton tape, just one page ago you were claiming it didn't exist. (It does, I've seen frame grabs, and it is a clear fake.) We will be seeing the "Stormy Daniels" tapes sooner than you might think. Think she has access to higher quality software?

a reply to: DJW001

Stormy Daniels tape? Ho Hummm. That was so yesterday, years ago. Even before he ran. And what makes you think it will change anything!? It's not impeachable...if true (emphasis on "if true").

originally posted by: thepixelpusher
a reply to: DJW001

Stormy Daniels tape? Ho Hummm. That was so yesterday, years ago. Even before he ran. And what makes you think it will change anything!? It's not impeachable...if true (emphasis on "if true").

Not only is it not impeachable, it will do nothing to convince his dim witted supporters that he is a liar. Isn't that your point?

originally posted by: DJW001

originally posted by: thepixelpusher
a reply to: DJW001

Stormy Daniels tape? Ho Hummm. That was so yesterday, years ago. Even before he ran. And what makes you think it will change anything!? It's not impeachable...if true (emphasis on "if true").

Not only is it not impeachable, it will do nothing to convince his dim witted supporters that he is a liar. Isn't that your point?

Actually, its those that hate Trump that are dim witted. Just look how easily they are misled to a point of delusion. They are the most desparate people who will believe literally anything if it damagrs Trump, including fake pee tapes and wsshed up porn stars.

a reply to: mkultra11
a reply to: DJW001

Yes, CNN is covering this uncritical thinking news 24/7 just to please the anti-Trumpers.

a reply to: DJW001

More proof for you.

BREAKING! PROGRAMS LIKE ADOBE VOCO CAN FAKE TRUMP N-WORD TAPE

a reply to: DJW001

I assume you're referring to the DemWits?

a reply to: thepixelpusher

Glenn Beck did a story on this about a year ago, and how soon tech will be so good you wont know whats real and whats not, so we will need to fall back on common sense and research.

Weve already lost the last two

Were doomed.

a reply to: Whatthedoctorordered

Glenn Beck read my thread!

a reply to: DJW001

Little intelligence?
A billionaire and now President.
I guess you must believe in Chance Gardner stories.
Perhaps you need to work a bit on your own intellect, before criticising a man who has achieved more in this competitive world than you can ever hope to.

a reply to: UKTruth

What do you expect from a guy who gets his news from Facebook!??

originally posted by: thepixelpusher
a reply to: DJW001

More proof for you.

BREAKING! PROGRAMS LIKE ADOBE VOCO CAN FAKE TRUMP N-WORD TAPE

I would never ever count that out. Remember memogate? Its highly probable on so many levels.

The good part is that it will be analyzed by other and debunked. The bad part is that the narrative will be set, but it's oire or less confirmation bias. The determining factor is if its confirmed by those who were with him when he said it on tape.

I believe that they are so desperate, Trump is swaying the African American vote to which he needs a small percentage, like 15 -20% to pretty much lock 2020. The midterm is probably more important than the next election.

a reply to: mkultra11

Read my original post. This is something that can pollute both parties if the media start to create fake facts to go with their fake stories. CNN, I'm looking at YOU!

a reply to: Pharyax

Yeah, did you see that remapping a person's face was accomplished using a lowly webcam with the software. Anyone with a little patience could recreate these realistic results. Imagine what Intel agencies can do!

a reply to: DJW001

And the opposition could paint a war scenario on TV convincingly to their audience like CNN did in the Gulf War! Check out the current scenario made by the Weather Service for hurricane Florence and tell me the media couldn't fool people convincingly of anything they wanted to do!!



People Are Cracking Up At This Video Of A Weather Channel Reporter Being A Little Dramatic During Hurricane Florence
“And the Oscar goes to...”