It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: caf1550
a reply to: dreamingawake
The cameras were off because my departments Dash Cams don't turn on until the Lights are turned on or until the officer opens the door to the cruiser. As for the body cams, they can either be manually turned on by the officers themselves, or they can have sensors on them that will automatically turn them on when an officer draws a firearm (those are much more expensive and most departments don't have them)
Unfortunately for this situation we do not have the full details yet since the Bureau of Criminal Investigation is now handling the case and they try to keep everything very hush hush. Now I always support the police and all of the cases like this. Now it is tough to come to a conclusion about why the officer shot as it is now being investigated, If he was in the wrong he should be prepared to be indicted and charged. We will just have to let this investigation play out.
One of the officers involved in the fatal shooting of Justine Damond said he heard a loud noise before realizing his partner had shot through an open window, striking Justine Damond in the abdomen, according to information released Tuesday evening by the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension.
The new information from the BCA does not fully answer those questions — in part because Noor refused to be interviewed by investigators, so his mind-set is still a mystery — but it offers a timeline of what happened that night. The BCA said Noor's attorney, Thomas Plunkett, has not indicated whether the officer will give an interview.
originally posted by: vonclod
If he refuses to give an interview he should be arrested and booked into jail. I imagine that would be the result for Joe citizen.
Would negligent homicide be a reasonable starting point for a charge?
originally posted by: vonclod
a reply to: Xcathdra
I guess we will not know what his intent was or what he perceived until he gives an interview, I understand the right to not speak, or lawyer up..it really stinks in this case.
Thank's for your input on the legal definitions.
originally posted by: Xcathdra
originally posted by: c2oden
Where is the outrage?
Where are the protests?
Does her life not matter?
do you want the P.C. answer, the racist answer or the common sense answer?
ETA - or your own answer
originally posted by: BlueAjah
a reply to: caf1550
I understood that report to mean the loud noise heard by the driver was the gunshot. I don't think that they meant there was a different loud noise before the gunshot (if that's what you are saying.)
originally posted by: c2oden
originally posted by: Xcathdra
originally posted by: c2oden
Where is the outrage?
Where are the protests?
Does her life not matter?
do you want the P.C. answer, the racist answer or the common sense answer?
ETA - or your own answer
The common sense answer, of course.
But, my answer is correct.
There does not seem to be any paid protesters attempting to incite violence.
originally posted by: Greven
originally posted by: c2oden
originally posted by: Xcathdra
originally posted by: c2oden
Where is the outrage?
Where are the protests?
Does her life not matter?
do you want the P.C. answer, the racist answer or the common sense answer?
ETA - or your own answer
The common sense answer, of course.
But, my answer is correct.
There does not seem to be any paid protesters attempting to incite violence.
Maybe 'white people' just don't care as much?