It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
If these people
originally posted by: elementalgrove
a reply to: Phage
They are simply discussing further ways of creating a more toxic environment, with an absurd level of hubris that only a scientist could have, again declaring "It is not really a moral hazard... it is more like freeriding on our GRANDKIDS"!
On “Moral Hazard”, this is a technical point for economists. when you think carefully about the definition its clear that’s quite the right way to describe SRM, “free riding” another econ term that more accurately describes what we are doing when we don’t cut CO2 emissions. To be clear, I do mean “putting off addressing the problem of climate change is like free-riding on our grandkids”. It’s not that SRM is free riding, it’s that over enthusiasm about its potential may encourage less action to cut emissions.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: seentoomuch
High altitude dispersal of bioagents is a really stupid plan. Even the military knows that.
They didn't think that then.
And you think that constitutes a "chemtrail?"
So I guess they were going to throw vials out the planes?
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: seentoomuch
False.
It was considered idiotic. If it was considered at all.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: seentoomuch
False.
It was considered idiotic. If it was considered at all.
originally posted by: seentoomuch
originally posted by: awareness10
actually i said there's a much higher count of diabetes now than ever before, i didn't 'specifically say chemtrails'.
Unless you believe that the chemicals they put in the ground via you know the ones.. really does go up into the clouds when it rains and spreads it all around for us to breathe in and enjoy.
yum
I need to add for clarification that my father said that the chemicals would change when they went into the atmosphere and the symptoms when it reached the ground would be different. He had to carry a syringe in his belt at all times and a day after a test a sentry far away from the test area went into convulsions after chewing on a piece of grass but his symptoms were different from a full on exposure and my father was almost court martialed for injecting him because he wasn't exhibiting all the symptoms, just a couple. It saved the sentry's life though.
So basically, what goes up doesn't necessarily come down, there are changes.
Who knows what's floating around up there nowadays, and what form it will come down as,
STM
And I believe we, ourselves are putting things into our environment that will have serious effects on us.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: seentoomuch
Yeah.
My dog ate my homework a bunch of times.
Don't bother with patents because there are a lot of those for things that never happened. Don't bother with bad things that have been done because, well, that isn't evidence that things are being done.
Show me some evidence that contrails are anything but contrails because contrails have been observed for more nearly 100 years and the claim that they are something devious has been around for about 20 years. With...no...evidence. Show me evidence, and I'll listen.
I don't know how to prove it to you.