It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: elementalgrove
a reply to: Bedlam
Again it is nice that you think that the two would have to be mutually exclusive, yet if they wished to add chemicals to the cloud seeding programs, how would you know the difference.
And if they had done so would the neo-cloud seeing be able to be considered "Chemtrails", perhaps we could call it cloud seeding chemtrails for clarification!
The spraying of this silver iodide is what we see on the ground as chemtrails
originally posted by: awareness10
This is really just it, no one knows what line is being crossed. The thought of Chimeras was unthinkable 12 yrs ago, perhaps longer, but now it's occurring, and probably did before it was slowly introduced into the public mindset.
actually i said there's a much higher count of diabetes now than ever before, i didn't 'specifically say chemtrails'.
You know that the concept is based upon what has been observed from natural processes, correct?
I am aware of where the stratosphere is, either way spraying aerosols in the atmosphere for any purpose seem counter to the natural order of things.
originally posted by: awareness10
actually i said there's a much higher count of diabetes now than ever before, i didn't 'specifically say chemtrails'.
Unless you believe that the chemicals they put in the ground via you know the ones.. really does go up into the clouds when it rains and spreads it all around for us to breathe in and enjoy.
yum
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: seentoomuch
Yes. Our civilization has "contributed" many things to our environment.
But the notion that, because contrails can persist and spread, they are actually "chemtrails", is an expression of high ignorance.
The notion that if something were being sprayed, that contrails are visible evidence, is an expression of high ignorance.