Weather Warfare Assault, A Physician Speaks Out

a reply to: awareness10

Ah.
"Special snowflakes" then.
So, you think that they are genetic experiments?

a reply to: Phage

Now that is a very interesting theory right there. I like that theory... Special Snowflakes 'the secret genetic experiments we haven't been told about' in which the brain is purposely altered so that the synapse misfires and the neuron that releases neurotransmitters in response to an impulse, fails and overloads thus creating this monstrosity we call 'special snowflake syndrome'.

originally posted by: seentoomuch

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: seentoomuch

Yes. Our civilization has "contributed" many things to our environment.

But the notion that, because contrails can persist and spread, they are actually "chemtrails", is an expression of high ignorance.

The notion that if something were being sprayed, that contrails are visible evidence, is an expression of high ignorance.

I'm not convinced 100% that our government wouldn't put something in the mix. My Dad had to pack Tularemia for aerosol delivery during the Korean war. After it was packed it was canceled at the very last minute. He also packed another but I can't recall which plague it was. He was forced to do this and after the war he started a health company to help people, he was so traumatized by it all as we all would be. The only reason I'm speaking of this now is that he has passed on and to heck with them.

STM

First of all, I am truly sorry to hear of the compromising situation your father was put into!

There are many more stories like these and it is truly disgusting the kind of experiments that have been done under the name of "science" within the medical/military industrial complex's.

a reply to: Phage

To me the notion that they could not spread toxic chemicals in persistent contrails is an expression of high naivety...

Also, "our civilization" has been hijacked for quite some time by an elite ruling class that has not only willingly "contributed" to the sheer and utter destruction of our environment, but has insidiously used deception to do so... from buying up alternative technologies to brainwashing people into being against a plant that is simultaneously food/medicine/resource.

a reply to: elementalgrove

To me the notion that they could not spread toxic chemicals in persistent contrails is an expression of high naivety...

Who said they could not?
You should avoid strawman arguments. They don't really help your position.

a reply to: awareness10
We, at last, have the answer to the Indigos!
We know what they are!

a reply to: awareness10

Do you mean the ones that don't melt because of sublimation...

youtu.be...

Sorry it is a natural part of nature.

a reply to: elementalgrove

To me the notion that they could not spread toxic chemicals in persistent contrails is an expression of high naivety...

yes they COULD , but question is WOULD they ?

let me present my counter argument :

To me the notion that they would spread toxic chemicals in persistent contrails is an expression of high scientiffic illiteracy

heres why :

what is commonly identified as alledged chemtrails - is commercial jet exhaust operating at 5 to 6 km ASL

QUESTIONS ARE :

1 - what payload is needed to " spray toxins " from that altitude over a land mass in sufficient concentration to have a toxic effect on the alledged victims ????

2 - is answer one within the capabilities of any operated airframe ?

3 - is there a easier // simpler // more cost effective way to poison a given victim population ?

there are further points - but the answers to the 3 above questions do not support " spraying toxins " at 6 km ASL

Sometimes you can cast a view without backing it up, an overall estimation right ? Well here's some answers ,generic ones in reply as have read this thread .

They , as in the filter keys , whoever they are , CG if you want , who do this spraying , only come on certain days , although its hard to say what theyre doing when its cloudy enough for rain. It's normally bright clear mornings in the summer . which turn into misty skied mornings by the time they're done , and they fly home whence this effect is achieved .
The , barium? compound they use is there to reflect very strong and harmful sunlight rays back into space , deflecting an aggressive drying and burning effect which has increased since industrial pollutants in the atmosphere became the norm.
By engineering the environment below the level at which the (holographic) barium is distributed , the team spraying is simultaneously protecting the human populace from skin cancers, rapid desertification , and the agitant effects of the heated rays on the industrial pollutants already in the atmosphere.

In the 20th Century , astronauts who looked down on earth made a stern warning to those below about how very thin the atmosphere looked , from only a few miles up. It is the atmosphere which is or will be the problem , it is the atmosphere which has to be protected first , but on ground level the effects of very dry air and excessive levels of heat transmute to repeated failed harvests as well as environmental stress (esp soil).

Realistically speaking , (not departing on an essay ) , besides retarding the insect world , why else would they do it , eg Bush jr had trouble with his cheek - caused by the sun . He might have said it wasnt unnecessay or unethical , unpalletable for the general public though it also is . Don't panic the turkeys

Hi and bye btw

a reply to: elementalgrove

Except the US wasn't using it and Russia confirmed that it was bs coming from China and NK.

www.wilsoncenter.org...

And Russia at that time would have definitely made it public that it was happening.

originally posted by: ZIPMATT
Sometimes you can cast a view without backing it up, an overall estimation right ? Well here's some answers ,generic ones in reply as have read this thread .

They , as in the filter keys , whoever they are , CG if you want , who do this spraying , only come on certain days

I've found that those certain days are the ones where the relative humidity at the 300mb level is high

a reply to: awareness10

I guess it should be pointed out that Dane Wigington has been shown to be a fraud and liar and uses fake pics as evidence...

youtu.be...

youtu.be...

Sorry he knows less about what he is saying than probably you do.

originally posted by: tsurfer2000h
a reply to: elementalgrove

Except the US wasn't using it and Russia confirmed that it was bs coming from China and NK.

www.wilsoncenter.org...

And Russia at that time would have definitely made it public that it was happening.

Oh nice the Wilson center hey!

Nothing like a memorial to the scum bag President who sold the country out to be a reliable source of American benevolence!

A different take on American interest in Biowarfare following WW2

A PDF of a report put forth by investigators, from 1952

Aside from the Bio warfare, we had no problem dropping 635,000 tonnes of Napalm upon the Koreans and murdering over 3 million of them.

But yea it is a stretch to imagine that putting some metals in aersols would ever happen!

a reply to: ignorant_ape

I believe that David Keith answered your questions in the video shared earlier... no worries though, it is simply "free riding on your Grandkids".



Also to answer question #3, I would say fluoride, asparteme, high fructose corn syrup, food dyes, a litany of preservatives... they are quite ingenious with their methods of profitting off of poisoning the masses, let along worrying about cost!

a reply to: elementalgrove

On “Moral Hazard”, this is a technical point for economists. when you think carefully about the definition its clear that’s quite the right way to describe SRM, “free riding” another econ term that more accurately describes what we are doing when we don’t cut CO2 emissions. To be clear, I do mean “putting off addressing the problem of climate change is like free-riding on our grandkids”. It’s not that SRM is free riding, it’s that over enthusiasm about its potential may encourage less action to cut emissions.

If you need any of it explaining to you then feel free to ask. Or just ignore it and carry on getting it wrong - up to you

a reply to: elementalgrove

Nobody is arguing that they didn't use napalm now are they...I pointed out the use of Tularemia so please pay attention before trying to move the goalposts.

And so because they are named after a president you don't like that means anything they say is wrong and their research is to...gotcha.

a reply to: elementalgrove

Where are the Giant space mirrors, the cloud ships?
www.geoengineering.ox.ac.uk...#

It's kind of sad that you folks put just enough effort into what "could" happen with planes, but disregard the whole of what geo-engineering is about.

First off, the planes. What altitude would they be spraying the bad stuff at? Surely you know this right? Well, the hint here is in the name. SAI. STRATOSPHERIC Aerosol Injection. The Stratosphere. Why, that's not at all where most planes fly. It's a bit higher than the 30-38K range.

If you are truly interested in this and not just because you like to "look up" and pretend you have some special knowledge about what you see, you might want to check out the link at the top of this post. It's a very good start to understanding what has been PROPOSED so far. And one day, it may just start, and possibly without our knowledge or consent. So if we had some folks looking for what really might happen as opposed to looking at contrails and pissing themselves over not understanding the basics of science, someone might be able to stop, or at least identify a real problem.

a reply to: awareness10

Just saw this article as well.. wonder if the two topics are connected at all

"Enjoy Earth While It Lasts: Atmospheric Carbon Levels Pass the Point of No Return" www.complex.com...

a reply to: FamCore

With such an uplifting article, I feel compelled to jump on the green bandwagon and do something good for the environment.

sarcasm aside, weather this is hyperbole or not, making empirical statements about the Earth from the point of view of Humans is quite laughable. Sure, we might just pollute ourselves out of existence, but the Earth will be just fine. She will purge all the ugliness in the blink of an Earth's eye. (a few million years)

We should have learned from the Dinosaurs. Too many beans and too much cabbage, now we have this.

a reply to: network dude

We should have learned from the Dinosaurs. Too many beans and too much cabbage

Is that a joke-reference to cabbage and beans making the dinosaurs fart, increasing methane levels, or am I reading too much into that statement? lol, I do tend to do that sometimes.

a reply to: FamCore

yes, but with us, it's cow farts that caused this whole mess. Damn cows.

It's articles like this that make me feel good about my stance on AGW.

I may be an idiot, and I may be "going against all the smart folks", but I'd prefer to believe that the Earth has more to do with it than we do, and things just might change in the near future. (there is no harm in believing that, and based on the article, it's the safer opinion for mental health and stability)