It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Perhaps, and I'm not trying to answer for Krazyshot here but, perhaps it's because the topic of the thread is "Racism in the Bible". Not the Torah or Talmud, not the Q'ran, not the writings of Confucius and not Buddhist or Hindu Vedas.
And why did you feel the need to add the slur "booty pumpers"? Does it make you feel better about your position? Does it give an air of authoritarianism do denigrate and slur? You are aware aren't you that many, many heterosexual couples engage in anal sex right? Or that you can be in a homosexual relationship(2 men is my point of reference) and NOT engage in anal sex? It does nothing to add to your point except for reinforce your ignorant hatred of something you clearly do not understand.
I don't think that most people here are implying or stating that god or jesus are racist. They are saying that a couple dozen books, compiled over a millennia and a half and claimed to be the infallible word of god are racist. In other words, the area where these books were originally written down and the time periods in which it all took place, were rife with racist attitudes and that in the 21st century we should be able to move beyond anachronistic bronze age control mechanisms.
So it isn't actually your theological background that instills this thought process within you, its your own personal biases and you simply hide behind religion to justify your hatred for others. So much for love thy neighbor and turn the other cheek!
Filthy... its a matter of the practice involved as well as the individuals involved. The inference seems aimed solely at male on male sexuality as there really isn't anything that could be construed as "filthy" when referring to a lesbian couple aside from your personal aversion to it. Going back to a male on male act... the level of filthiness from a clinical perspective isn't nearly as filthy as you may want to believe or have been taught and furthermore, there are many prophylactic steps that can be taken to avoid unnecessary messiness.
originally posted by: artistpoet
a reply to: Entreri06
All Humans are capable of hate and bigotry ...
It is not exclusive to just Christians though the details of those base emotions may vary
originally posted by: Entreri06
originally posted by: artistpoet
a reply to: Entreri06
All Humans are capable of hate and bigotry ...
It is not exclusive to just Christians though the details of those base emotions may vary
Absolutely!!! But I'm not the one pretending me or my religion is speacial!
:p
originally posted by: Seede
Simply because some heterosexuals engage in anal sex does not mean they are not also booty pumpers. It is still a filthy diseased ridden unnatural act to me and to my God. Regardless of how you are offended does not make it acceptable to Christianity and the Christian God. The slurs towards Christ Jesus and His God are just as offensive to me and many others as well as my slurs are offensive to you. I am not into political correctness.
Call it whatever you want but to my God it is unnatural and filthy. Your clinical explanations mean nothing to God but then your God is not my God by your own admission.
Thanks for perfectly demonstrating what a true Christian is NOT. Also the act is indeed perfectly natural as it happens in nature constantly. Disease is spread through heterosexual sex as well. Funny you should argue using false premises and fear mongering filled with hatred rather than facts. You only follow Jesus' teachings when it suits you? This defines to a T the type of behavior that is influenced by the violent and hateful passages that the OP brought to light in this thread, and typifies the contradiction with the old testament god and the new testament god.
I wasn't expecting somebody to rush in and prove him correct, but you pretty much just did exactly that! The saddest part is that there are actually thousands upon thousands that agree with this bigoted view and look down on others as a result. This is a major problem with society and if you were a homosexual, you wouldn't be saying any of the above, so not only do you contradict Jesus, you completely lack empathy for folks that Jesus would have embraced.
Why create that attraction as a possibility if it is a filthy and unnatural act?
originally posted by: Seede
a reply to: Barcs
Thanks for perfectly demonstrating what a true Christian is NOT. Also the act is indeed perfectly natural as it happens in nature constantly. Disease is spread through heterosexual sex as well. Funny you should argue using false premises and fear mongering filled with hatred rather than facts. You only follow Jesus' teachings when it suits you? This defines to a T the type of behavior that is influenced by the violent and hateful passages that the OP brought to light in this thread, and typifies the contradiction with the old testament god and the new testament god.
You are welcome.
I have not demonstrated anything as yet. Are you implying that you understand what a true Christian is and yet endorse the sin of booty pumping? Could you give the source of the bible that you have in which it is permissible to be a homosexual or lesbian?
Homosexuality is perfectly normal according to Jesus? It is normal among some of the animal kingdom but only the ones that are not accountable for sin according to Christianity. The filthy acts of homosexuality and lesbian practice are not of Christianity according to manuscripts of Christianity. It may be normal to you but not to the God of Christ Jesus. Regardless of being normal to this culture is not to say that God approves of that act. You do understand that simply because an entire group of humans kill and eat the flesh of other humans that it is approved by God?
Yes disease is spread through heterosexual behavior and that is also addressed by God in the bible. Yes it a sin once a person becomes aware of that being a sin. No, God does not approve of any sin and God is not indwelling in anyone while that one is in the act of sin.
I am not rushing in. You do realize we are on page 20? I hardly believe he or you are correct. I do believe also that it is very sad to realize how perverted a culture can descend in a few short years. You are correct in that if I were a booty pumper that I too would champion this filthy act.
Contradict Jesus? How does hating the sin of homosexuality and lesbianism contradict Jesus? Can you show this in the teachings of Christ Jesus? Please give your source. If I hate murder or theft does that mean that I look down upon that sinner? You are another one who judges without wanting to be judged. You have no idea of what I am or what I think of any sinner.
God did not create the sin in us. You and I created all the sin that we have. And yes, we all have a lot of sin in us. But God didn't do it. We did this all by ourselves. God simply gave us the ability to either embrace a sin or overcome that sin. If you don't believe in the Christian God then so be it. That is your right to do so. If you think booty pumping is perfectly normal then that is your right to think so and with that thought then there is nothing more to say. Your words show your allegiance. Nothing more to be said.
This kind of people in past would burn/kill/silence everyone who did not match their imaginary gods delusion and his will...
originally posted by: artistpoet
Are all Christians full of hate and bigotry .... NO not by any means
Does the Bible contain Bigotry and hatred ... YES some
originally posted by: Seede
I have not demonstrated anything as yet. Are you implying that you understand what a true Christian is and yet endorse the sin of booty pumping? Could you give the source of the bible that you have in which it is permissible to be a homosexual or lesbian?
I hardly believe he or you are correct. I do believe also that it is very sad to realize how perverted a culture can descend in a few short years. You are correct in that if I were a booty pumper that I too would champion this filthy act.
Contradict Jesus? How does hating the sin of homosexuality and lesbianism contradict Jesus? Can you show this in the teachings of Christ Jesus? Please give your source. If I hate murder or theft does that mean that I look down upon that sinner? You are another one who judges without wanting to be judged. You have no idea of what I am or what I think of any sinner.
God did not create the sin in us. You and I created all the sin that we have. And yes, we all have a lot of sin in us. But God didn't do it. We did this all by ourselves. God simply gave us the ability to either embrace a sin or overcome that sin. If you don't believe in the Christian God then so be it. That is your right to do so. If you think booty pumping is perfectly normal then that is your right to think so and with that thought then there is nothing more to say. Your words show your allegiance. Nothing more to be said.
Does the Bible calls for hate and action against nonbelievers - yes, it does
There is a good reason in today society we have separation between religion, education and politics (to some extend, not enough if you ask me), and times when those 3 were merged we call 'dark ages'.
So all those heterosexual people who have gotten divorces or had children out of wedlock are also sinner in the eyes of God correct? They should be just irredeemable as a homosexual right?
You may not believe I'm correct, but you are demonstrating the VERY behavior that I am lamenting in the OP, so you are definitely a good case study to look at when speaking on this.
Jesus never condemned homosexuality.
Cut the philosophical talk. Science has pretty much proven that homosexuals can't help the urges they feel for people of similar sex as their own. The only available explanation for such a thing if you want to believe god exists is that god made those people homosexual. It ISN'T a choice and you are lying to yourself and possibly using that lie to hurt others through your ignorance.
originally posted by: Seede
Being heterosexual is not to say one is sinless. Even the Apostles were sinners. You make a bad comparison. I have never suggested irredeemable. That word is left to the judge and not the Christian and I have never even suggested that a homosexual or lesbian were condemned or irredeemable. Recognizing sin and being a sinner is not the same. I have judged no one of myself but only as written by the Apostles. If a man rightfully judges himself then he will not be judged.
You are correct. I do not believe you are correct and I am honored to be your example of contending the acceptance of homosexual and lesbian sin.
Prove that will you? Yes prove that statement by all means.
Then obey your science but God made science and science did not make God.
And what if there is no God to make the sinner sin? Would it then be this science that is at fault?
You need not be so concerned because it is the law of this land that approves this sin against God. But if God does not exist then you have nothing to be concerned.
A true Christian, from what I understand, is Christ-like. They do not put others down and actively preach hatred toward them. They do not judge others. In reality you have no clue what god actually wants. You have an ancient story book that you think is his word, but have no actual evidence or justification to support such a claim.
I think the bible is a primitive book written by barely literate people who didn't understand anything about the world they live in. It wasn't written by god, it was written by man and the writers obviously couldn't get past the "yucky" factor and it seems you can't either.
I notice you failed to mention your position on divorce and having children out of wedlock.
Although Roman men in general seem to have preferred youths between the ages of 12 and 20 as sexual partners, freeborn male minors were strictly off-limits, and professional prostitutes and entertainers might be considerably older.
Roman ideals of masculinity were thus premised on taking an active role that was also, as Craig A. Williams has noted, "the prime directive of masculine sexual behavior for Romans." In the late 20th and early 21st centuries, scholars have tended to view expressions of Roman male sexuality in terms of a "penetrator-penetrated" binary model; that is, the proper way for a Roman male to seek sexual gratification was to insert his penis in his partner. Allowing himself to be penetrated threatened his liberty as a free citizen as well as his sexual integrity.
It was expected and socially acceptable for a freeborn Roman man to want sex with both female and male partners, as long as he took the penetrative role. en.wikipedia.org...
If only it worked out that way... But like I pointed out in the bible, people who believe as you do tend to try to use their beliefs to change laws and discriminate against these people then hide behind your religion claiming "Freedom of religion" like the 1st amendment gives you carte blache to keep someone else from having equal rights.
It's funny how you think that society has deteriorated so badly. During the first century, homosexuality was way more popular and accepted than it is today. Nero married a transsexual man, for crying out loud! Men had sex with young boys, all the time, and the biblical Jesus never said a word about it.