It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: mOjOm
a reply to: Benevolent Heretic
That's how it seems to me too, but that obviously isn't the reasoning they would use to explain it. I'm more curious as what their reason is for only choosing to deny women and not men too. I'd really like to hear their logic behind it.
originally posted by: Blaine91555
False argument. The SCOTUS decision only applies to a very specific class of corporation where all the owners share the same belief and only applies to four methods that are seen to cause a fertilized egg to abort.
The Supreme Court on Tuesday confirmed that its decision a day earlier extending religious rights to closely held corporations applies broadly to the contraceptive coverage requirement in the new health care law, not just the handful of methods the justices considered in their ruling.
originally posted by: Willtell
a reply to: Battleline
When fascists (GOP and tea party) loose a fight they shut down government…
I would say that is worst than a tantrum.
originally posted by: damwel
Well how's this for American religious liberty? Since conservatives seem to think it's ok for them to refuse to pay their employees birth control insurance due to a religious objection, then since monetary interest on a loan is a religious no-no in Islam, all Muslims with us bank loans must have their interest on those loans forgiven. How's that sit with you? It's this simple, KEEP YOUR RELIGION AT HOME and quit forcing it on other people.
originally posted by: Blaine91555
a reply to: Benevolent Heretic
I've already acknowledged my error.
The Hobby Lobby case however was only about the four methods out of 20 and unrelated. That's were I got confused.
The problem remains that one side is trying to force the other side to go against their core beliefs, even to the point of wanting them to pay for something they honestly believe is murder. To call that unreasonable and in fact just plain bullying is not entirely wrong.
Shoe on the other foot, you believe something the other side is forcing on you is wrong at the same level as murder; do you fight back or do what you think is a horrible crime?
Compromise is the only answer and those unwilling to engage in finding a compromise are the problem.
originally posted by: Benevolent Heretic
Why do you think people say the GOP has a war on women?
originally posted by: FlyersFan
originally posted by: Benevolent Heretic
Why do you think people say the GOP has a war on women?
Because it's one of those catchy soundbites that the left likes so much ... you know ...
originally posted by: Annee
The GOP is the Christian Right.
Fundamental Christianity is oppressive of women in itself.
originally posted by: FlyersFan
originally posted by: Benevolent Heretic
Why do you think people say the GOP has a war on women?
Because it's one of those catchy soundbites that the left likes so much ... you know ... like 'yes we can'. Seems to me the dems have a 'war on Christians' much more than the GOP could possibly have a 'war on women'. I mean, afterall, Obama even came out and called the right 'the enemy' in front of a bunch of democratic supporters.
Obama tells Latinos to 'punish our enemies, the GOP
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: MarlinGrace
Exactly, I'm tired of being told that what they do with their bodies and in their bedrooms is none of my business (hmmm, business) and then being told that I have to pay for it (doesn't that then make it my business?).
If they want me to butt out, stop demanding I be a part of it with my money.
If you want to keep the exclusive to decide what you do with yourself and how, then you take full responsibility for that, including monetary responsibility. If I'm not involved at any point in the process, then why would I have any say?
originally posted by: MarlinGrace
Of course it's only about a womans body until it's time to pay, then responsibility is then transferred to the public who should remain quiet but open their wallet for practices of confiscation. Is it not the same for any instance where personal responsibility is ignored? The greatest of vote purchasing agents available.