It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
UnBreakable
And you are sure she didn't commit the crime because?
Fenrin
There was a knife found at the boyfriend's apartment with the victim's blood on it as well as Amanda's DNA.
"While that may seem on its face to be evidence of a crime, in order to substantiate such a small amount of DNA you look for blood, and I can't emphasise enough how small this was - it was just a few cells."
But there was no evidence of blood or any other body fluids found, the Boise State researcher points out.
"You can't really wash the blood off and leave the DNA in any practical sense. That means that the few cells or molecules might have been from the laboratory after they amplified Miss Kercher's DNA," he explains.
By amplification, Dr Hampikian is referring to the common process by which millions of copies are made from isolated DNA strands, using a method called "polymerase chain reaction", or PCR.
This concern was not his alone. There have been claims that the initial evidence was handled using dirty gloves and that investigators entered the crime scene without protective clothing.
embarrassing case for the Italian Justice system that put a lot of bad light and international embarrassment on them
boymonkey74
reply to post by GogoVicMorrow
If you are not guilty you do not tell lies.
azdaze
boymonkey74
reply to post by GogoVicMorrow
If you are not guilty you do not tell lies.
Not True. Lots of innocent people have confessed to crimes they didn't commit, and have later been cleared through other evidence, or because the story they concocted is so contrary to the evidence that even the investigators decided to take a second look. ALL humans lie.
celticniall
reply to post by Kryties
.......innocent cos the US media says so.....
she is guilty and most people outside the US can see that.
Yes that is the actions of a guilt person, trying to escape....why do you think Knox didnt go back if she was so sure of her innocence? cos she isnt innocent.
Fylgje
reply to post by celticniall
I agree. I think they have more than enough evidence that Knox did it in cold blood. Screw the politics, the US should extradite her immediately. Like you say, if Knox was innocent, she would want to go there and clear her name. How long will it be before she does this again? If she does, that blood will be on the US's hands. IMO, I think she is a dangerous, perverted, psychopathic killer who will kill again. Hope nobody else says anything to her about her uncleanliness.
FlyersFan
No. She spent four years in jail for a crime she didn't commit. She was convicted on gossip and anti-American bias in the newspapers there. Nothing more. Looking at the facts of the case, it's really insane that she was charged at all.
Fylgje
reply to post by celticniall
Like you say, if Knox was innocent, she would want to go there and clear her name.
Fylgje How long will it be before she does this again? If she does, that blood will be on the US's hands. IMO, I think she is a dangerous, perverted, psychopathic killer who will kill again.
Fylgje Hope nobody else says anything to her about her uncleanliness.
Skyfloating
FlyersFan
No. She spent four years in jail for a crime she didn't commit. She was convicted on gossip and anti-American bias in the newspapers there. Nothing more. Looking at the facts of the case, it's really insane that she was charged at all.
These pedestrian views, stated in an absolute tone, by people who couldnt possibly know whether she is guilty or not...thats the most annoying thing about internet discussion forums.
GogoVicMorrow
reply to post by alldaylong
I'd run too if a corrupt force was trying to lock me up for a crime i didn't commit.
THey already have the killer in jail, he was the one that didn't belong in the house yet his DNA was found there. He had real motive where the others didnt.
alldaylong
GogoVicMorrow
reply to post by alldaylong
I'd run too if a corrupt force was trying to lock me up for a crime i didn't commit.
THey already have the killer in jail, he was the one that didn't belong in the house yet his DNA was found there. He had real motive where the others didnt.
If you run you have something to hide.
QED
GogoVicMorrow
alldaylong
GogoVicMorrow
reply to post by alldaylong
I'd run too if a corrupt force was trying to lock me up for a crime i didn't commit.
THey already have the killer in jail, he was the one that didn't belong in the house yet his DNA was found there. He had real motive where the others didnt.
If you run you have something to hide.
QED
First off he didn't run. I read the article and edited my post.
Second the notion that you run because you have something to hide is ignorant. He has nothing to hide.. they have investigated it for years now. There is no evidence against him. Did the people that ran to Canada from Vietnam have anything to hide? No.
You can run from a corrupt system. If they are trying to make you fit into a puzzle you don't belong in and by doing so take your life away, you'd be smart to run.
Stop trolling. So many trolls in this thread. Trolls or people who are downright ignorant of the case.