posted on Dec, 13 2013 @ 05:32 PM
You're just being obtuse. ... So no, the reporter is NOT technically right so you can keep your "ignoramus" statements.
Right backatchya ....
Asian. Negroid. Caucasoid. That's it. Why you people on the left have such a hard time acknowledging when a caucasian person, who is admired, is
caucasian ... well it's asstounding. Like i said, if someone tried to take away the fact that MLK was black, ya'll would be foaming at the mouth
Jesus probably had olive skin. That makes him caucasian. 'White'.
My hispanic daughter, who is darker than many black children in her class, is 'caucasian'
and has had to check off the 'white' box on legal forms.
It's just the facts of the matter. Deal with it.
Ohhh, I see.
You seem to be harboring under the dillusion that those three official classifications are the only classes of races in the world. I got news for you,
everyone outside of the Census Bureau doesn't refer to ethnic categories that way.
Why does your daughter check the "causasian" box on legal forms?
They make those forms with "hispanic" as an option.
At least they did through every major test I had all through school...
Oh look, I guess that means there's more races in the world than just those three.
Oh, and also, you seem to say "the reporter was correct" a lot.
Defending Fox News...?
That should tell everyone here what kind of argument this is...
The fact that she's referring to a fictional man modeled after a Pagan God's race as "historical fact" is the hilarious icing on the freakin' cake
edit on Xx53650531PM125 by XxNightAngelusxX because: (no reason given)