It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Of course windword is right, barrenness would have done it. Or God could have snapped a finger and have them all painlessly and instantly disappear, or He could have left them out of creation all together, or God could have made a perfect world with perfect people living perfect lives.
Well, I didn't mean ALL sinners, LOL, just the ones that God sent the Israelites to kill. If these people were so terrible, killing babies and all, God could have made a generation barren, and that would be the end of them. Easy Peasy!
THIS IS FOR EVERYONE: I really did. The people posting in this thread have been thoughtful, polite, and constructive. I can't tell you how grateful I am. I know I've said it before, but Wow! You and the others are the best ATS has to offer.
You said that you would do anything to have a conversation about religion with normal people. I'm not sure you got your wish, but I feel I'm, for the most part, in good company here.
lazernation
Yossarian says it best: Catch 22
"And don't tell me God works in mysterious ways," Yossarian continued, hurtling on over her objection. "There's nothing so mysterious about it. He's not working at all. He's playing. Or else, He's forgotten all about us. That's the kind of God you people talk about - a country bumpkin, a clumsy, bungling, brainless, conceited, uncouth hayseed. Good God, how much reverence can you have for a supreme being who finds it necessary to include such phenomena as phlegm and tooth decay in His divine system of creation? What in the world was running through that warped, evil, scatological mind of His when he robbed old people of their power to control their bowel movements? Why in the world did He ever create pain?"
"Pain?" Lieutenant Schiesskopf's wife pounced upon the word victoriously. "Pain is a useful symptom. Pain is a warning to us about bodily dangers."
"And who created the dangers?" Yossarian demanded, He laughed caustically. "Oh, He was really being charitable to us when He gave us pain! Why couldn't He have used a doorbell instead to notify us, or one of His celestial choirs? Or a system of blue-and-red neon tubes right in the middle of each person's forehead? Any jukebox manufacturer worth his salt could have done that. Why couldn't He?"
"People would certainly look silly walking around with red neon tubes in the middle of their foreheads."
"They certainly look beautiful now writhing in agony or stupified with morphine, don't they? What a colossal, immortal blunderer! When you consider the opportunity and power he had to really do a job, and then look at the stupid ugly little mess He made of it instead, His sheer incompetence is almost staggering. It's obvious. He never met a payroll. Why, no self-respecting businessman would hire a bungler like Him as even a shipping clerk!"
"You'd better not talk that way about Him, honey," she warned him reprovingly in a low and hostile voice. "He might punish you."
"Isn't He punishing me enough?" Yossarian snorted resentfully. "You know, we mustn't let him get away with it. Oh no, we certainly musn't let Him get away scot-free for all the sorrow He's caused us. Someday I'm going to make Him pay. I know when. On the Judgement Day. Yes, that's the day I'll be close enough to reach out and grab that little yokel by His neck and -"
Bumbling, primitive idiot works well too.
Fascinating. This is off-topic, but you have just shown that Man is unique in all the world. He is the only being who can be innocent or guilty, and can be innocent only if he replaces his instinctual behavior with some "Higher Law." Be careful, at this rate it won't be long until you're attending Mass with me. May I buy you your first Rosary? (You can't tell, because I've only got these crummy smileys to work with, but I'm chuckling.)
They cause no harm... Which is not to say that something like a tiger which kills its prey is "evil"... They are only acting according to their own nature... Even man acting by his/her own nature is programed to kill... but we can choose to rise above such actions.
I'm saying "Sir" to anybody who can create a Universe.
Fair enough... but who is to say the OT God was the "creator" of the universe?
In fact... recently I've come to think that the OT God was quite possibly an alien being using technology to fool the primitive folk... The so called "burning bush" could have been a hologram. I mean, fire that doesn't burn?
What sort of so called "God" needs fire and smoke, thunder and lightning to land on top of a mountain?
Kinda sounds like a "craft" with rockets to me honestly...
Boy, Akragon, I don't know. That doesn't seem to be what Jesus said in Matthew 5:17-19:
Seems to me he broke and changed the laws of Moses... Which is why so many people wanted him dead...
I can only come to the conclusion that Jesus is saying the law and the prophets are perfectly good and binding until they are completely fulfilled. Where does that leave us? The Old Testament was correct and supported by Jesus, at least in it's laws and prophets, and as He fulfilled the Law, he must be the one prophesied, the Messiah, or Savior of the world. (I know it looks like I skipped a logical step there, but I've only got so much time and you can fill it in yourself.)
Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfill. For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled. Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven: but whosoever shall do and teach them, the same shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven.
Scientists are informing us that early humans may have cross-bred with late, whatever the scientific name for slightly pre-human is. I'm sure there was enough genetic variety to go around. I still insist that Adam and Eve were two (or maybe more, could the name be collective?) people with souls who God had set aside for a special life. They served as "representatives" of a sort for all mankind. They chose wrongly and the entire human race became infected with the results of their bad decision.
Adam and Eve were apparently the first "humans" with souls. Whether they were made individually, or a pair reached humanity and God intervened, or whatever, I don't know. Certainly, only they, God, and the Deceiver were present. Remember Dan Rather? I think he was the one who said "The facts were incorrect, but the story was true."
I'm glad you laughed. If we don't get some fun from this, what's the use? Isn't it easier to believe in a talking snake and donkey than a talking bush? Especially if the bush is on fire? If it were me, I'd be talking too, but I'd be saying "Help! Put me out! Ouch! That's hot!" But seriously, if one doesn't accept even the possibility of miracles, there's no sense discussing Christianity. Christianity doesn't exist without miracles.
Talking snake? So you don't believe in telepathy?
LOL... I suppose the talking donkey was a telepath as well?
I understand that God is none of those things. My purpose is to get out in the open those charges and refute them as well as I am able. Many seem to accept that the Old Testament God is evil. I wanted to create a place where those ideas could be discussed without bitterness and rancor. I was hoping that some would go away with a new understanding of what God is like and what the Old Testament teaches.
Why are you trying to understand if God is a bumbling primitive idiot? By starting this thread you throw wood onto the fire and open up to comments from disbelievers who blasphemy God.
Quite true.
Some folks are determined to reject the message of Jesus.
My scope is limited. I have no office or work. I speak to my family regularly and that, with God's Grace, has shown results. My other outlets are a Christian group whose members I try to encourage, and lead to deeper prayer and communion with God. My other outlet is here. I hope to speak to all, but especially those who are open minded. Further, I have no idea how many people see these threads and do not comment. Perhaps they are affected.
Rather than keep beating our heads against a wall that the evil one has erected in the heart of someone, God calls us to move on in our efforts to reach others.
I'm only expressing what I feel in my heart. If I am doing ill, please tell me how I am offending others by it, or sinning against God, and I will do my best to correct it.
BTW: I notice you often say, "I apologize" in your posts. You have no reason to apologize.
Meek is not weakness.
AfterInfinity
reply to post by Fraudfinder
If that's the case, why are you here? Leave us sinful blaspheming heathens to burn in peace. Sounds like a better time than listening to you.
I'm not sure where you got the idea that Biblical morality is wildly special. It's really not, with one major exception which I'm sure you'll support.
For me I suppose that part of it doesn't seem to matter. It seems to me that biblical morality isn't particularly special, . . .
Why does the biblical God follow the exact same trends that we would expect any law or moral creating system to follow?
As you may have seen, my position is that the Mosaic laws were firm and consistent. Their "deadline" was when they had all been fulfilled. Jesus did that, and the world has the choice of living under the old law or the new. Christians are under the new law.
This especially jumps out when referencing temporary laws or instructions such as in the OP. To me this implies the same moral relativism that secular moralists are accused of. . . .
Why were no preemptive deadlines placed on these temporary laws? Why haven't they been updated? God moves in mysterious ways they say, but so too does culture and society.
Yet it's surprising how few succumb to that temptation. People are still free to choose wrongly, and as any glance at a newspaper will tell you, they frequently do.
The freewill belief doesn't go far in my mind either since tempting a living creature with eternal life doesn't appear to be allowing that freewill to blossom in my mind.
I disagree that God made our current life as confusing and difficult as it is. But even if He did, is it cruel to offer the hope of eternal life, rather than just saying "No way is that gonna happen?"
To offer eternal life whilst making this current life as confusing and difficult as possible just seems cruel and unusual.
charles1952
reply to post by Fraudfinder
Dear Fraudfinder,
I'm especially grateful for your post, for you offer helpful criticism on more than just one of my arguments. By offering it on the entire thread and on me you force me to look at a broader picture which may contain the root of many problems.
The reason I put up this thread was that I ran across another post by a member who called the God of the Old Testament a "bumbling, primitive, idiot" and other names. I had seen that type of name-calling before and decided it needed a thread of its own to address the accusation, and not just a reply post. I do hope you noticed the question mark.
For the record, if it is necessary, I reject the claim that God is a maniac, stupid, primitive, idiotic, bumbling, and a host of other negative terms. I'm really sorry I caused you such distress.
I understand that God is none of those things. My purpose is to get out in the open those charges and refute them as well as I am able. Many seem to accept that the Old Testament God is evil. I wanted to create a place where those ideas could be discussed without bitterness and rancor. I was hoping that some would go away with a new understanding of what God is like and what the Old Testament teaches.
Why are you trying to understand if God is a bumbling primitive idiot? By starting this thread you throw wood onto the fire and open up to comments from disbelievers who blasphemy God.
Quite true.
Some folks are determined to reject the message of Jesus.
My scope is limited. I have no office or work. I speak to my family regularly and that, with God's Grace, has shown results. My other outlets are a Christian group whose members I try to encourage, and lead to deeper prayer and communion with God. My other outlet is here. I hope to speak to all, but especially those who are open minded. Further, I have no idea how many people see these threads and do not comment. Perhaps they are affected.
Rather than keep beating our heads against a wall that the evil one has erected in the heart of someone, God calls us to move on in our efforts to reach others.
Additionally, I hope to demonstrate that a Christian position can be maintained with reason, respect, and love. (Although, I despair of being the example I should be, and pray to God for His mercy and forgiveness.)
I'm only expressing what I feel in my heart. If I am doing ill, please tell me how I am offending others by it, or sinning against God, and I will do my best to correct it.
BTW: I notice you often say, "I apologize" in your posts. You have no reason to apologize.
Meek is not weakness.
With respect,
Charles1952
He didn't make the epitome of evil, he made an angel who was the highest of Angels, the most beautiful, the "Light Bearer." Oh, and "giving birth" to Satan was probably a slip of the tongue. He didn't give birth to any of the angels, and He didn't create Satan, Satan got that new name as part of the plea agreement.
But making the epitome of all evil and sending it to earth was perfectly acceptable?
Actually, we were the ones who decided to quit "God, and company" and join up with Satan's outfit. (Some posters claim it's Walmart, others claim it's Monsanto.)
Giving the prince of darkness dominion over the creatures he was so jealous of was a logical and moral course of action?
And here I thought it was pride and the desire to be equal to God, who created him.
Us humans were the reason he fell to begin with.
What's important to Satan is that God loves us. There's nothing he can do against God directly, so he decides to try to destroy God's loved ones. (Now you know where the mafia and some modern politicians got the idea.)
Then he gets cast out of heaven to spend the remainder of his years with the creatures he was so disgusted with.
I sincerely hope not. After all, you are one of His ideas.
Think again, Charles. If bad ideas were an artform, God would be Da Vinci or Michelangelo.
I absolutely agree. At first, or even second, reading, astonishment, shock, and even horror are completely understandable.
As for Cogito's remark, I can certainly understand the contempt or disdain that one feels when "meeting" this 'God' via interpretation of a collection of ancient writings, and as you may recall, I'm stuck at the point where translations and versions and interpretations of dead languages merge.
I think I agree, depending on what you meant by "documentary evidence." About all science and historians can tell us about the Bible with absolute certainty is that we've got almost precisely what was originally written. There is other evidence supporting it, but the Bible can't prove itself.
Having said that, I don't think ANY of the Bible versions are likely to be actual 'documentary evidence',
Absolutely, I'm looking forward to it.
so I will address what I understand of the OT 'God' just as I would (and do) all characters from literature, movies, real-life interactions, etc. I hope that is an acceptable way to address your thoughts.
God knew who the chosen people were, it wasn't intended for Him. I think He wanted the Israelites, and the people around them, to know that they were different, set aside.
Why would an all-knowing 'God', who sees into the hearts and minds and truth of EVERYTHING he 'created', not be able to tell his 'chosen people' apart from the riffraff?
But in this case everybody wore the orange jumpsuits, the prisoners, guards, cops, judges, the President, everybody. It was to identify themselves as part of a different nation, a chosen people. No one was single out or controlled because of their beards, it showed membership.
This, to me, sounds like a way for human rulers and law enforcement personnel to know who is in their jurisdiction, much like orange jumpsuits, or school uniforms.
I'm not sure what he believes in with, perhaps, the exception of reincarnation and the nice moral teachings of Jesus.
Whatever his beliefs, he expresses great confidence with them. He has never been rude to me, and I enjoy talking with him. He's certainly different from me, but that's what I'm here for. There are a couple of posters with whom I will have nothing to do, but Akragon certainly isn't one of them.
Well, you're a wonderful, sweet person who holds the same view that many do. They require ditching the Bible, which I'm not prepared to do, but they're your views. "Of course I'll respect you in the morning" (Blast these limp-wristed smileys! I can't find one that fits.) But I can't say the same about those beliefs.
what about me!
Do you not fear God?