Your Vote ATS'ers: Attack or Not To Attack Syria for Alleged Chemical Attacks on its Own Citizens?

Its a No from me.

It will achieive nothing except an escalation in middle east tensions.

Israel seem unusually quiet..

NO NO NO!
I bought the WMD line the 1st time. Never again! Sick of all these wars.

nee, jo, naï, laa, votch, xeyir, ez, nie, na, aïlle, ne, nann, né, hmar te, cha, tla, pù shi, nò, nej, ei, nei, non, nee, nanni, ara, nein, ohi, nahániri, aole, lo, nahin, nem, tidak, iié, ala, thay, oya, ahneo, bo, neen, tsia, le, kaore, ugui, kheyr, não, nu, niet, ag, aiwa, siyo, aita, lla, illaï, yuk, kadhu, maï, hayir, oevoel, ni, neni, nage, awa, déedéet, rara, and no .

The WORD of GOD already told you all not to give the AC the POWER and SWORD to take peace from this world causing brother to be against brother (Rev. 6). STOP THE MADNESS . Just say NO to WWIII.

reply to post by ItDepends

NO, NO, NO

reply to post by ItDepends


Hell No

NO, and why hasn't the US bombed the rebels for using gas in Jan 2013? if they believe the UN on Assad's alleged use then they should end support for the rebels and Al Qaeda...

NO beyond any doubt.

Yes

j/k

NO

No.

Never trust a man trying to wage war with a noble peace prize around his neck.

NO for many reasons!

Should the international community put sanctions on nato countries FOR LYING? Yes!

Originally posted by Navieko
nee, jo, naï, laa, votch, xeyir, ez, nie, na, aïlle, ne, nann, né, hmar te, cha, tla, pù shi, nò, nej, ei, nei, non, nee, nanni, ara, nein, ohi, nahániri, aole, lo, nahin, nem, tidak, iié, ala, thay, oya, ahneo, bo, neen, tsia, le, kaore, ugui, kheyr, não, nu, niet, ag, aiwa, siyo, aita, lla, illaï, yuk, kadhu, maï, hayir, oevoel, ni, neni, nage, awa, déedéet, rara, and no .

edit on 9/9/13 by Navieko because: (no reason given)

I can't believe you missed "Nyet" But you did get your point across.

here's my vote:

nooooooooooooooo.com...

I am UNABLE to give a "yes" or "no" answer, in the same way as anyone else, including foreign governments is unable to give a conclusive answer.

The reason is that YOU and ME don't have the proof who is actually responsible for killing 1500 innocents, mostly children. The videos shown and the MSM reports are only reporting about the gas attack...but we have not given the proof WHO is responsible.

The only one *claiming* to have proof is Obama based on "intelligence"...but not even that seems conclusive.

How for god's sake could I say "Yes! we should bomb Assad" or form an opinion on that?

And since the NSA did not knock on my door (and neither on yours) delivering 100% evidence that Assad is responsible..the logical answer at that point would be "no" unless otherwise proven.

You don't go to war or support a war based on VAGUE ASSUMPTIONS and guesses.

No.
for all the excellent reasons others have already said.
Let's stop providing maid service to every other country while our own house is falling down around our ears.

Anyone who blew a gasket over the 22 kids killed in Sandy Brook and demanded action , and who said no is a hypocrite.

I say yes, because mass murder should not go unpunished nor should it be tolerated through inaction.

If you allow a crime like this to go unpunished or unanswered you are as guilty as the person who committed it.
M.

1.) Congress has not given approval to strike.
2.) UN has not verified that the Assard government is responsible.
3.) No other countries are at arms next to the US to take on this responsibility.

I could go on and on but with this said, I say hell no.

reply to post by NoRulesAllowed

its very simple then..your answer would be no if there is no proof provided, how could you come up with any other answer or a non answer?..its the same as no?

and my answer is absolutley not..it will be opening up a global can o worms

Good Day ATS'ers!!! Capturing totals over night and this morning....3 additional pages of responses during that time!

Will be posting shortly!


Thank you ALL again for such a turn out and for making your votes and convictions known!! Well Done