It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I've already voted "no". Following his speech nothing has changed. I still say NO.
reply to post by ItDepends
Been there done that....and continue to do so. But answering a question with a question is not my cup of tee, or my french fries. To each to his own.
But for site choices, how about opening a poll in the form of ummmm...ohhhhhh...i dont know,... how about, "does the U.S. or Syria have as a sovereign state the right to defend or attack ?"
Now that's the type of cerebral activity you're more than likely to engage net user's than what this site has as monthly page views on a monthly level.
BTW. simply extending an open palm of friendship.
Is this a trick question?
Anybody with half a brain ought to be able to figure this one out, one way or the other. There are multiple reasons.
Only if you think that saving international political face by attacking, just because you made an ultimatum and other's didn't obey it, should you vote yes. And if you vote 'yes', because of this, I'll give you a long list of countries to bomb...
Almost every other POV to lead eventually to a well-reasoned No.
Bombs would do a great deal of good if launched at the Whitehouse, Congress, Federal Reserve, DHS, CIA and so on .. and on ..
The enemy is within - time to get your rope, torch and pitch forks.