It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Mary Rose
reply to post by AbleEndangered
You're reminding me of a website I posted about earlier:
Mary Rose
This is an interesting and information-packed webpage: "The Aether Experiments and the Impact on Cosmology" by Conrad Ranzan (2007):
. . . The emergence of a modern aether theory has led Professor Reginald T. Cahill to the causal mechanism of gravity and the author to the intrinsic cellular structure of the Universe.
He says "light doesn't accelerate forward or backwards but it does accelerate sideways in certain cases....".
AbleEndangered
The amazing clarity of Children:
Mahatma Gandhi
“In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.”
AbleEndangered
reply to post by dragonridr
Our system, our beautifully knowledgeable smart system stuck this kid in special education....
Mahatma Gandhi
“In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.”
Mary Rose
reply to post by dragonridr
Maybe the problem is the term "curved space," which sounds like an oxymoron.
Mary Rose
reply to post by dragonridr
Maybe the problem is the term "curved space," which sounds like an oxymoron.
Mary Rose
reply to post by AbleEndangered
You're reminding me of a website I posted about earlier:
Mary Rose
This is an interesting and information-packed webpage: "The Aether Experiments and the Impact on Cosmology" by Conrad Ranzan (2007):
. . . The emergence of a modern aether theory has led Professor Reginald T. Cahill to the causal mechanism of gravity and the author to the intrinsic cellular structure of the Universe.
www.cellularuniverse.org/AA1Aether&Cosmology.htm
www.cellularuniverse.org...&Cosmology.htm
If a forensic investigation were to be performed to find the root cause of the disastrous failure of 20th century cosmology (and some aspects of astrophysics), it would lead to a famous experiment in 1887 and its subsequent misinterpretation. An enquiry into history reveals the discounting of an experiment's data, a disregard of its cautionary conclusion and the adoption by the scientific community of an unjustified interpretation ---the denial of the existence of aether and absolute motion-- with regrettable consequences. The discovery of the causal mechanism of gravity was delayed by well over one hundred years as theorists devoted themselves to the modeling of mathematical space. Without the existence of an aether-space fluid, the Science of Cosmology henceforth dedicated itself to the creation of hypothetical mathematical universes. Maybe the most appalling consequence is the failure to recognize the Universe's self-organizing preferential structure. The Universe, consisting, as it does, of aether-space that is regionally dynamic on the large scale, is a cellular universe. Those are three profound consequences. Meanwhile, the aether has been re-discovered at least six times during the 20th century. And it is only relatively recently that this knowledge has been incorporated into a restructuring of fundamental physics. The emergence of a modern aether theory has led Professor Reginald T. Cahill to the causal mechanism of gravity and the author to the intrinsic cellular structure of the Universe.
Angelic Resurrection
Mary Rose
reply to post by dragonridr
Maybe the problem is the term "curved space," which sounds like an oxymoron.
Yes it is. There is nothing like curved space.
Now every wave is an acceleration.
dragonridr
Angelic Resurrection
Mary Rose
reply to post by dragonridr
Maybe the problem is the term "curved space," which sounds like an oxymoron.
Yes it is. There is nothing like curved space.
Now every wave is an acceleration.
You try to come on here like you understand physics then say something like this care to explain? Because curved space has nothing to do with waves at all.
ImaFungi
reply to post by dragonridr
If light is an electric wave creating a magnetic wave which creates an electric wave and so on, isnt light; constantly accelerating itself? If its not a single object which is put in motion and stays in motion according to the energy of motion used to put it in motion.edit on 17-10-2013 by ImaFungi because: (no reason given)
And so light slowing down when hitting a material, is it not weird how its wave is not disturbed? Like radio waves can travel through walls and air and such? Does this mean that the wave of information, (from a radio station) interacts with kijillions of electrons but maintains the same wave form?edit on 17-10-2013 by ImaFungi because: (no reason given)
pauldude000
reply to post by peter vlar
Astrophysicists hypothesized dark matter due to discrepancies between the mass of large astronomical objects determined from their gravitational effects and the mass calculated from the "luminous matter" they contain: stars, gas, and dust.
And that does not give you the clue that science is flawed? The initial problem stems from the fact that the calculations did not match the current theory. Instead of logical examination of the theory according to is legitimacy or accuracy, the scientists in question instead hypothesize something akin to "it's magic".
Like it or not, theory has become sacrosanct in science. Instead of theory following its definition of being the best available explanation, many theories have taken the logical position of physical law in the minds of said scientists... IE it is proven to be true under specific conditions. Science is slowly turning back to it's roots; basically it is reverting back into a religion.