Ok first em fields are caused literally by space.An electromagnetic field is the motion of an electromagnetic charge moving through space .It forms
from two things if the electric charge stands still we get an electric field.If the electric charge moves through space we get a magnetic field.
Remember how i was telling you about points in space transferring information.How space responds depends on the information it gets.Now we combine
these two together you get the electromagnetic field.Which is considered as having its own existence in space apart from the charges or currents (a
stream of moving charges) with which it may be related.
Ok all my questions pertain to how the EM field, or space as you call it, physically and mechanistically exists. If we could see it and draw it how
would we see it and draw it. AKA if we could know exactly what reality was and how it exists, what would we know? An electric charge moves and
causes waves in space/em field...How, why? What is space made of that it does this, how does it do this, how does an area of space/em field
wave/ripple/photon? You mentioned there being points or particles everywhere in space, is that really the final answer, at every smallest point in
space there is a photon, waiting to be disturbed? And how are those photons connected, is there space between them? This is painting an image of the
EM field being like water, the photons being like atoms bound to molecules creating the water field, is this an accurate analogy?
Now your misunderstanding the double slit experiment a bit it didnt prove a particle is a wave. In physics a particle is just a cloud of energy. how
to explain this with out confusing you ok you know in school they showed you those neat charts with the atom and its Protons Neutrons and Electrons
well its wrong. In truth atoms work on probabilities. In the atom Electrons, protons, neutrons are popping in and out of existence constantly.
Scientists don't know why, they don't know where they go. They just know they do. This is where theories like string theory comes in. The double
slit experiment proved that these particles are poping in and out and only when measured do they behave like a particle. But when we arent looking
they can be anywhere.Meaning simply until we observe the particle it is in multiple places and we Refer to this as a wave function. Simply put you can
look at this as the particle being in all its possible energy states. The double slit experiment isnt a wave like you were thinking its an analogy
used to help people understand interference patterns.And in physics analogies can do as much damage as good if you dont understand the principle.
A particle is a cloud of energy, thats a very confusing statement. So a particle of light, a particle of quark, and a particle of electron, are all
clouds of energy, and the only reason they are different is because the energy that is the cloud is moving in a different way? or what? What is the
energy that is a cloud, how did so many little clouds of energy become existent and how are they so stable? I have trouble discerning from my own
perspective when physicists mistaking what they know about reality, what at this moment in time they can possibly know about reality...and reality
itself. So I have no confidence believing you when you say physicists think particles pop in and out of existence, it is more logical and with more
confidence for me to assume that their beliefs and discoveries is a product of the limits of experiments and convenient math, because I have yet to
hear a plausible physical parallel, and this is physics isnt it. I am only worried with what actually exists, what the heck reality actually is and
how it works. Just because the uncertainty principle and our inability to measure particles or energy clouds continually does not mean they pop in
and out of existence, that is something a child would infer after playing peekaboo. Maybe I dont understand the double slit experiment but maybe you
dont either, can you provide me with a video explanation that shares the same interpretation as the one you have provided...or any source?
As far as the last point you cant get an electromagnetic charge to stand still if you do its no longer an EM charge its an electric charge so no
theirs no limit to the amount an area of space can have. I better get to bed but i hope your at least getting some of what im trying to say physics is
hard to teaach or learn just through text. Because you lack the ability to brain storm and just shoot off questions until you can piece it together in
The last point was not about getting EM charge to stand still, EM radiation is not charged, it was about getting an area of EM radiation to stay in a
centralized area, maybe could be done with a indestructible room of mirrors, and the tiniest of holes to fill it in with EM radiation, just for
thought experiment, hypothetical sake. Im all about brain storming and asking questions, I know how successful and smart physicists are of the last
100 years or more, and I know I am not in the mix at the forefront of discussion, knowledge and understanding of the universe, but I have faith that
it is understandable, I have faith I am talented at understanding, and I have faith that the smartest physicists on earth dont understand the
fundamental nature of the universe well, and I am mad at them, because that is their only job and responsibility, I am mad at the lack of critical
questioning in high places and progress in comprehension. This anger of ignorance is the only thing that keeps me interested in this topic, which is
beyond man and academia, it is truth itself, and none of us choose to be ignorantly coupled to it, some of us can choose to ignore it, but it stares
me in the face and laughs at me, and it is equally laughing at the smartest physicists in the world.