It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Hawkssss
@Deadalus
Indian dude. In terms of aggression, no one can compare with you inidans. Take a look at this website and spin this one for us. China is small potato compared with what you peace-loving hindus have done. Plus, we chinese are twice richer than you and live on average 10 years longer than you so you better take care of your own business before sticking your nose over here.
Website depicting Indian atrocity against its many minorities: the muslims, the sikhs, chrisitians, buddists, kashmiries, etc.
indianterrorism.bravepages.com...
"Whether or not one agrees with President Clinton's policy in Kosovo, we went there to stop the `ethnic cleansing' of the Kosovars by the Serbian government. Yet we have averted our glance from a similar campaign throughout India , a situation the Indian Supreme Court described as `worse than a genocide.' This ethnic cleansing has taken the lives of over 250,000 Sikhs since 1984, over 200,000 Christians in Nagaland since 1947, over 60,000 Muslims in Kashmir since 1988, and thousands upon thousands of Dalits, Assamese, Manipuris, Tamils, and other minority peoples."
[edit on 14-11-2004 by Hawkssss]
Originally posted by CMCLA2003
The United States of America is probably one of the greatest countries on earth, I don't think China can ever replace the US as a superpower. One reasonly mainly freedom: we have far more freedom than the chinese people, the china government even controls on what they watch. Freedom is the blood that runs through the veins of the United States of America, which will keep us as a great superpower.
Originally posted by Hawkssss
No. I never said china is innocent. What I am saying is that china is no worse and no better when it comes to aggression and human rights violation. Yet, all you hypocrites would like to bring human rights up as if it was a patented chinese right only. So stfu next time when you want to use human rights because that's the most stupid thing to say because what you people did to native americans and africans (I assume you are an hypocritic american)
The event caused Internet users to express discontent at the current political situation, the awakening of social conscience, and alarm at the corruption in Mainland China, as well as concern for the future of the nation. However, the hosts of the forums quickly terminated all comments and reports concerning the Wangzhou event, and the government moved to stifle all mention of the event.
The scale of the conflicts is becoming larger, and they are also becoming more and more violent. A survey of nearly one hundred scholars and experts conducted by Beijing University showed sixty percent of the experts think that China will probably face a crisis in the social, economic, or political field before 2010 that will influence the development of the nation.
Originally posted by plutonian
China is founded almost 60 years ago with nothing, I mean absolutely nothing, now it is one of the strongest country in the world, a leader of third world countries, and you are telling me it is going to collapse in 40 years, are you kidding me? Open your eyes, make a graph out of your analysis, it doesn't even make a slope.
Originally posted by cubiehole
Originally posted by plutonian
China is founded almost 60 years ago with nothing, I mean absolutely nothing, now it is one of the strongest country in the world, a leader of third world countries, and you are telling me it is going to collapse in 40 years, are you kidding me? Open your eyes, make a graph out of your analysis, it doesn't even make a slope.
About 20+/- years ago, I bet a lot of people would have said and thought the same thing about the USSR. It's amazing the image that can be portrayed despite the reality that lies inside.
Originally posted by Daedalus3
Aahh but the above analyses indicate that the progress is not linear. Hence calculating slope would be pointless. Aysymptotic assumptions will haev to do!!
Originally posted by aryaputhra
Give it 40 years, my take is China will disintegrate into small factions. It will be an implosion rather than explosion. .With economic growth more freedom will be demanded (as is happening in Singapore, Hong Kong, Taiwan). And that will be China's downfall. Cultural differences between provinces have so far not spilled over but definitely there are showing telltale signs.
Originally posted by cubiehole
Originally posted by plutonian
China is founded almost 60 years ago with nothing, I mean absolutely nothing, now it is one of the strongest country in the world, a leader of third world countries, and you are telling me it is going to collapse in 40 years, are you kidding me? Open your eyes, make a graph out of your analysis, it doesn't even make a slope.
About 20+/- years ago, I bet a lot of people would have said and thought the same thing about the USSR. It's amazing the image that can be portrayed despite the reality that lies inside.
Originally posted by aryaputhra
Actually China doesnt not really find any place to be a world superpower. By mere growth terms you cannot define it as a superpower. To be a superpower the definition of superpower needs to be applied. A super nation where power, culture, politics, business are far reaching in relation to other nations. Like America or the former USSR, where a lot of factors do apply.
Mere catching up on 'GDP growth' does not make it a superpower.
Give it 40 years, my take is China will disintegrate into small factions. It will be an implosion rather than explosion. .With economic growth more freedom will be demanded (as is happening in Singapore, Hong Kong, Taiwan). And that will be China's downfall. Cultural differences between provinces have so far not spilled over but definitely there are showing telltale signs.
Originally posted by sardion2000
They technically don't have a pure free market, they have free market zones that are getting expanded fairly soon according to a recent CNBC report. It's interesting the parallels between China and the US. The US merged their Democratic Republic that was founded on Personal Freedoms with a system(Capitolism) that likes to limit personal freedoms while expanding economic ones. China is merging a gov't system that limits personal and economic freedom with a system that wants to expand Economic freedoms yet keep personal freedoms in check. Interesting situation isn't it.
I'm sorry but you are so wrong on this my friend. Being Chinese who came to Canada five years ago, I know factual information on the status of China. GDP is what makes a country a superpower, technically it is a chain of events e.g. Lots of GDP give the government cash, with cash the government needs a place to spend them, government spends money on promoting its economics and then investing in the military and then restarting the cycle. With military buildup and ability to project power AND a strong economics to back it up A COUNTRY IS DEFINITELY a SUPERPOWER.
Cultural differences in CHina? Even though we have 56 different cultures in China, we have always united as a whole for dozens of centuries. 98% of China is of the Han culture and the rest have been assimilated into Han culture. China will not split, although Taiwan might but that is a completely different story.
I have no Idea why you stated China will split into small factions so I presume you have not done indepth research of China and you simply ASSUME. ASSUME, assume makes an AS$ out of U and ME, understand??
Come on guys, DENY IGNORANCE, we can help you. Remember DO NOT ASSUME.