It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Evangelical apologist William Lane Craig...
"But why take the lives of innocent children? The terrible totality of the destruction was undoubtedly related to the prohibition of assimilation to pagan nations on Israel's part. In commanding complete destruction of the Canaanites, the Lord says, 'You shall not intermarry with them, giving your daughters to their sons, or taking their daughters for your sons, for they would turn away your sons from following me, to serve other gods' (Deut 7.3-4). […]
God knew that if these Canaanite children were allowed to live, they would spell the undoing of Israel. […] Moreover, if we believe, as I do, that God's grace is extended to those who die in infancy or as small children, the death of these children was actually their salvation. We are so wedded to an earthly, naturalistic perspective that we forget that those who die are happy to quit this earth for heaven's incomparable joy. Therefore, God does these children no wrong in taking their lives."
www.theguardian.com...
Bart Ehrman has laid out so many indisputable contradictions in the New Testament, that it's credibility is nothing but questionable.
Originally posted by windword
reply to post by ProfessorChaos
You say that there are NO contradictions in the Bible? Are you sure?
Originally posted by 3NL1GHT3N3D1
reply to post by Deetermined
The fact that he's an evangelical who believes the bible is undoubtedly the word of god, so of course he would try to discount anyone who questions the bibles supposed infallibility.
The apologist went on to argue that Ehrman's critique was misplaced since the author did not properly state and apply the "criteria of authenticity," an important objective criteria in any historical study.
Mark 15
34 And at the ninth hour Jesus cried with a loud voice, saying, Eloi, Eloi, lama sabachthani? which is, being interpreted, My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?
Luke 23
46 And when Jesus had cried with a loud voice, he said, Father, into thy hands I commend my spirit, and having said thus, he gave up the ghost.
Originally posted by 3NL1GHT3N3D1
reply to post by Deetermined
The fact that he's an evangelical who believes the bible is undoubtedly the word of god, so of course he would try to discount anyone who questions the bibles supposed infallibility.
Originally posted by Celt1
In scripture when Jesus prayed to God, he always said "Abba" Father. There is only one exception, On the cross when Jesus said "My God, My God, Why have you forsaken me?"
There was a two-fold thing going on with Jesus on the cross. That he wasn't just "preaching" via the Psalm 22's prophecy of the crucifixion, but actually FELT separated from God because he took on the world's sins (sin = separation from God).
The fact of Jesus referring to the Father as "My God" in this moment of despair would indicate that he was taking OUR place in that moment -- rather than those words being a reflection of his personal heart relationship with the Father...
As he said ye were all Gods... And died as gods die... They forget were they came from... The Holy Bible is for SINNERS... It's a Book Of Both Good And Evil... It's up to the men of knowledge to understand it's wisdom...
And as written it must be revealed... As it is now... Both by Numbers... As this Famous Quote... John 3:16... For you to become Christ Like In The Likeness Of Jesus Christ... Father And Son... By The Way Of Truth... FAST... Father Abbas Spiritual Truth... That Ghost That Jesus Lost On The Cross...
...Computer Math... Manifests Abbas Truth Here... MATH...
3:16 is (3x7) + (3x7) ... Is 21 + 21 = 42... For The Scientist The Number Of Life... 42 is 6... The Cross Of Mans Truth... ICXC... I Christ Connect Christians... The Blessing Of Jesus Christ...edit on 24-8-2013 by Celt1 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by windword
reply to post by Deetermined
Slightly different? They have him saying two distinctly different things!
If two witnesses to the same event can't get something like that right, what else did they get wrong?
edit on 24-8-2013 by windword because: (no reason given)
Mark 14
14 And wheresoever he shall go in, say ye to the goodman of the house, The Master saith, Where is the guestchamber, where I shall eat the passover with my disciples?
15 And he will shew you a large upper room furnished and prepared: there make ready for us.
16 And his disciples went forth, and came into the city, and found as he had said unto them: and they made ready the passover.
17 And in the evening he cometh with the twelve.
18 And as they sat and did eat, Jesus said, Verily I say unto you, One of you which eateth with me shall betray me.
13 When Pilate heard this, he brought Jesus out and sat down on the judge’s seat at a place known as the Stone Pavement (which in Aramaic is Gabbatha).
14 It was the day of Preparation of the Passover; it was about noon.