posted on Aug, 21 2013 @ 07:11 PM
Martin in reverse?? What kind of brainless idiot would even believe it the same thing in reverse? These kids killed for fun to see someone die, not in
ANY perceived self defense.
“This is nowhere near self-defense…this was cold-blooded, first-degree, recreational, for the fun of it because they were bored, murder,”
Well, DUH. That's why they were charged with murder. And they ADMITTED to doing it because they wanted to see someone die, and for the fun of it. His
argument collapses because, wait for it—they already admitted as much.
These three youths who killed this young athlete HAVE been charged and WILL (likely) pay the price, so what's the deal? Leave it to Limbaugh to make
an issue where there is none, and where there is no relevance to the Martin case. But hey, that's what he does. He wants his rating, so he'll make
it an issue others won't, and if others do he'll take the opposing side.
Are you implying that the media *should* give relentless sickening coverage to this crime, simply because they did with the Zimmerman/Martin crime,
which is completely unrelated? I see they media beating crimes into the ground far too often (the most recent with the GA school shooting: the local
media has been running it into the ground so much that it's sickening and unnerving). And I agree that the media pay undeserving and sickeningly
continuous coverage to a large number or crimes. But what does the one have to do with the other?
I guess according to RL the media should blow every single white/black, black/white crime into a frenzy simply because they paid so much attention the
the aforementioned (Martin) case. And that it's NOT anywhere NEAR "Martin in reverse," well:
I really don't see the point in this thread.