It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Christ is greek, the cross is a pagan symbol of Tammuz, and the Son's name never was Jesus, ever!
But the bible was written originally in Aramaic
Then Hebrew if I recall correctly
So why bring Greek into it ?
Originally posted by Philodemus
Originally posted by EnochWasRight
From Wikipedia: An axiom, or postulate, is a premise or starting point of reasoning.
My premise is not founded on a pretext. It's founded on a context found in the Bible. When we use this foundation, the contradiction and paradox below is resolved.
Right. That's my point. Why should we use the Bible?
edit on 16-7-2013 by EnochWasRight because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by jiggerj
reply to post by EnochWasRight
Now I am genuinely concerned, EWR. Are you okay? Not only have you taken your beliefs into a realm far beyond the common man, but you spent all this energy in posting your thoughts here at ATS. And, the only people here that can possibly comprehend, discuss and debate you are those that can speak fluent Hebrew and English, with a bit of Greek and Latin.
So, for you, I'm going to ask how many ATS members know these languages? If it's just one or two people, then you've wasted your precious time.
Really, are you okay?
Originally posted by Lazarus Short
For those who want to look deeper into the Hebrew and Greek alphabets in a way that may be complementary to the OP's thesis, check out the Meru Project's website:
meru.org...
Why do we need the Bible?
Originally posted by EnochWasRight
Originally posted by Lazarus Short
For those who want to look deeper into the Hebrew and Greek alphabets in a way that may be complementary to the OP's thesis, check out the Meru Project's website:
meru.org...
Very amazing. I'll spend some time on this.
Originally posted by cody599
Originally posted by windword
reply to post by roughycannon
The Greek alphabet is closer. Alpha Beta Gamma Delta.............
Epsilon, Zeta
Kinds loses it right there
But the bible was written originally in Aramaic
Then Hebrew if I recall correctly
So why bring Greek into it ?
Cody
Originally posted by Lucid Lunacy
reply to post by EnochWasRight
Why do we need the Bible?
Can I ask that question myself but with more specificity?
Why do we need the Christian Bible?
Curious what your rationale there is, as your prior response to Philodemus didn't seem to warrant one over the other.
edit on 16-7-2013 by Lucid Lunacy because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by windword
Originally posted by EnochWasRight
Originally posted by Lazarus Short
For those who want to look deeper into the Hebrew and Greek alphabets in a way that may be complementary to the OP's thesis, check out the Meru Project's website:
meru.org...
Very amazing. I'll spend some time on this.
OMG
PLEASE! Just watch the video!
Originally posted by windword
reply to post by EnochWasRight
Well, your on the right track. Except, you just authored this thread today, and this 8 part series completely encompasses and bypasses your 3 thread threads.
But the Meru Foundation has been doing this longer, and their presentation is more easy to understand, with mathematical truths and in a more logical way. And they do it without the Bible and Jesus. Just the alphabet and the first book of Genesis.
That's my point.
Originally posted by Lucid Lunacy
reply to post by cody599
But the bible was written originally in Aramaic
Then Hebrew if I recall correctly
So why bring Greek into it ?
Hebrew then Greek and Aramaic. Then Latin. If I recall correctly.
Original languages The Tanakh was mainly written in biblical Hebrew, with some portions (Ezra 4:8–6:18 and 7:12–26, Jeremiah 10:11, Daniel 2:4–7:28) in biblical Aramaic, a sister language which became the lingua franca of the Semitic world
Originally posted by bottleslingguy
reply to post by EnochWasRight
I don't believe any of this light/God phenomenon favors any one particular religion. I believe people are using letters and words to describe the same thing but it is not the thing itself. "that of which we cannot speak"
no one has the right to an exclusive claim on "God" but I agree light plays an important role in our lives and we couldn't live without it
Originally posted by EnochWasRight
Science can only use a premise based on theory (Limited intuition).
Here again, science must infer the parable they dream up to describe the theory. This does not assume the universe has intent.
Intention is natural selection. It seems like the universe would desire the strongest outcome.
Why?
Intent is design and the universe must have the ability to choose.
Yes. the function depends on consciousness. But that doesn't tell us anything about what the function describes. The means of knowledge vs. the source.
Collapsing wave function depends on consciousness and without it, no choice and no intent (By Design).
What inference? Please use more common English to state your premises.
Why do we need the Bible?
Apart from a secondary witness to confirm your inference from the evidence,
you cannot know that the reflection you observe has a mirror. Without an ability to see the light, you cannot know what you observe in the matter. Light cannot be seen. It is hidden until it reflects, much as information is 'formed inside' by the light that we see in the mind. Light is not in your mind by the way. It's dark in there. Light doesn't even enter the eyes. It's also dark in there. Our minds are information in formed into the mind by consciousness and consciousness needs to see the reflection between opposites. Since God has no opposite, light is only seen by its opposite. Matter is seen when light reveals what is already there. Your knowledge is the same. It's already there until the DNA keeping it at rest is lit up.
Take away our best image of God from the Bible