It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by EnochWasRight
If you have a way of arguing the points made in the OP, then consider aiming your comments at the evidence. Trying to render a derailment of the train because you do not like where it leads is not a point that needs to be made. The simple fact remains.
God makes claims. Those claims are shown to be in perfect reflection with the world around us.
Shattering the mirror, and picking out aspects of the reflection you do not like, will not change the fact that the mirror reveals God.
Argue all you want, I should not be able to describe physics and DNA within Genesis 1 unless it is both Truth and Divinely inspired.
Speaking of Light, consider the evidence in the OP for the nature of consciousness in matter
If you really want to help me, answer this: What is the nature of the relationship between subject and object?
You can tell me that I’m fighting and not arguing the evidence, that’s fine. But if you post this stuff on a forum and ask for feedback, why is like pulling teeth when someone asks you to explain your metaphysical stance? I know you want to talk about the material you present and that is great to see but if I ask you to elucidate your metaphysical axioms, your epistemology or your theory of concepts I fail to see why this should be a troubling task. Why should I take your word for it if I can’t examine how you form your knowledge. I cannot keep asking you the same questions over and over without getting answers and then just one day believe what you say anyway; to fault me for that is...I don’t know. It’s odd.
Originally posted by Philodemus
reply to post by bottleslingguy
He creates more problems than he solves with this nonsense. He knee-caps epistemology. Why can’t people who advocate the primacy of consciousness ever have a cogent hierarchy to follow?