It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by jadedANDcynical
reply to post by SilentKillah
Here is another story that spells it out:
A judge later rejected Alexander’s Stand Your Ground defense, saying that she could have escaped "through the front or back door," according to court records. Corey’s office offered a plea bargain that would have sent Alexander to prison for three years, but she rejected it, hoping to convince a jury she was defending herself.
Marissa Alexander, Mom Facing 20 Years, Shot At Abusive Husband In Anger, Prosecutor Says
And this tiny bit of information:
It took a jury 12 minutes to find her guilty.
Marissa Alexander, Florida Mom, Faces Mandatory 20 Years In Prison After Failed Stand-Your-Ground Defense
So you see, a jury, when presented with the facts of the case, found cause very quickly, there was never any doubt.
That's not what happened here.
Its extremely ludicrous to think that any self defense law can allow someone to act provocatively or in such a manner as to justify intimidating or killing people.
Why? Florida doesn't want to, the Feds can't, and it wasn't part of the Zimmerman case anyway.
I have no doubt that the stand your ground law will be repealed.
There was no abuse of any law.
I think that the Zimmerman trial was a good test for the sort of visual we need to understand that people will abuse laws like this.
Originally posted by ShadellacZumbrum
reply to post by JuniorDisco
Posted By Shadellac -
I’ll tell you what. Go out and try to prove your theory. Go get into an argument with someone and kill them and then tell me that they let you off for self-defense. After all if it is as easy as you say it is then there shouldn’t be a problem.
George may already have done this. That's the point.
That is a sorry excuse for a damn weak response.
You go out and do it. No one knows for sure exactly what happened so we can't say there was even an argument.
We want to know for certain. Afterall you are certain. .. . . aren't you?
Are you really asking me to murder someone to prove my point?
Originally posted by ShadellacZumbrum
reply to post by JuniorDisco
Are you really asking me to murder someone to prove my point?
I am Not asking. You are the one suggesting that you know Exactly how to get away with it.
Now, put your money where your mouth is.
Else, you might appear to be a Moron.
Originally posted by JuniorDisco
Originally posted by ShadellacZumbrum
reply to post by JuniorDisco
Are you really asking me to murder someone to prove my point?
I am Not asking. You are the one suggesting that you know Exactly how to get away with it.
Now, put your money where your mouth is.
Else, you might appear to be a Moron.
I know you are struggling to get to grips with this, but the Zimmerman verdict makes killings of innocent people slightly more likely.
In Florida you get 20 years for firing a gun even if nobody is hurt.
You appear to be ignorant of the details in the Alexander case
Originally posted by JuniorDisco
reply to post by butcherguy
I'm not interested in discussing it, particularly. It's not relevant to the fact that penalties for gun use in Florida are extremely high - 10-20-Life. Add that to the fact that you'll probably get off if there's no one to refute your story and you see why some people might have a think about pulling the trigger. Especially bad guys.
Originally posted by butcherguy
Then maybe you shouldn't have thrown the mention out of my ignorance of the details of the case... it kind of makes you look like you wanted to smear someone and couldn't back it up then.
Zimmerman= Not guilty
Was there anything stopping a person from shooting someone in cold blood and claiming self defense before the Zimmerman verdict? No.
Can it still be done? Of course.
It has happened before.
Originally posted by Grimpachi
reply to post by JuniorDisco
You have been told before but somehow you missed it.
Stand Your Ground had nothing to do with the Zimmerman case.
Self Defense has been a adequate defense for every state not just Florida. It wouldn't have mattered where it had happened in the US the result would have been the same as in NOT GUILTY. By reason of self defense.
But that doesn't matter because there was no counterparty - he alone was able to provide the narrative.
Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
but he had witnesses seeing him being beaten
People have known about the SYG and self defense laws long before the Zimmerman case. If they are planning a murder they are more likely to have gotten the idea from the law over the case
A 76-year-old Milwaukee man who said he was seeking justice when he shot and killed his teen neighbor after accusing the boy of burglary was sentenced Monday to life in prison with no chance of parole.