It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by danielsil18
Originally posted by RealTruthSeeker
Originally posted by danielsil18
reply to post by filledcup
Evolution is a scientific theory just like the theory of gravity. I still recommend you to learn about evolution. It's not as hard as you might think.edit on 1-7-2013 by danielsil18 because: (no reason given)
I don't buy it. After all those theories were written by men right? I guess we should just take their word for it. But wouldn't that be blind faith?
I put a small video in a reply about evolution, watch it because evolution in not something out of this world.
It's not blind faith because it can be proven and recreated by science.edit on 1-7-2013 by danielsil18 because: (no reason given)
I was joking. I know what evolution is. But explain this. What creature did monkeys sleep with in order to produce man? That one always makes my head hurt.
Originally posted by danielsil18
reply to post by filledcup
I think you only know about the carbon dating flaws from creationist websites, but you should also know that we assume the age of the Earth to be about 4.6 billion years from Radiocarbon dating, Potassium-Argon dating, and Uranium-Lead dating.
Originally posted by danielsil18
Originally posted by RealTruthSeeker
Originally posted by danielsil18
reply to post by filledcup
Evolution is a scientific theory just like the theory of gravity. I still recommend you to learn about evolution. It's not as hard as you might think.edit on 1-7-2013 by danielsil18 because: (no reason given)
I don't buy it. After all those theories were written by men right? I guess we should just take their word for it. But wouldn't that be blind faith?
I put a small video in a reply about evolution, watch it because evolution in not something out of this world.
It's not blind faith because it can be proven and recreated by science.edit on 1-7-2013 by danielsil18 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by danielsil18
reply to post by RealTruthSeeker
I was joking. I know what evolution is. But explain this. What creature did monkeys sleep with in order to produce man? That one always makes my head hurt.
That one is easy to explain, but ill show you a very short video with Richard Dawkins explaining your question:
Originally posted by RealTruthSeeker
Originally posted by danielsil18
reply to post by filledcup
I think you only know about the carbon dating flaws from creationist websites, but you should also know that we assume the age of the Earth to be about 4.6 billion years from Radiocarbon dating, Potassium-Argon dating, and Uranium-Lead dating.
the problem here is that "we assume" it is not fact. Once again, you are taking man's word for it. The age of the earth will never be proven unless run across a time machine one day.
Originally posted by danielsil18
reply to post by RealTruthSeeker
I was joking. I know what evolution is. But explain this. What creature did monkeys sleep with in order to produce man? That one always makes my head hurt.
That one is easy to explain, but ill show you a very short video with Richard Dawkins explaining your question:
Originally posted by danielsil18
Originally posted by RealTruthSeeker
Originally posted by danielsil18
reply to post by filledcup
I think you only know about the carbon dating flaws from creationist websites, but you should also know that we assume the age of the Earth to be about 4.6 billion years from Radiocarbon dating, Potassium-Argon dating, and Uranium-Lead dating.
the problem here is that "we assume" it is not fact. Once again, you are taking man's word for it. The age of the earth will never be proven unless run across a time machine one day.
You are right, it's not a fact and to be truly proven we might have to go back in a time machine. But there is something you don't know. Science agrees with you.
Science doesn't show us our past as a fact. What it shows is that the Earth is about 4.6 billion years, take or add a few million years. Science is not perfect but it's the best explanation.
We know the Earth to be about 4.6 million years with different dating methods. They all came to about 4.6 billion years, which enforces our confidence that it's right.
Originally posted by danielsil18
Originally posted by RealTruthSeeker
Originally posted by danielsil18
reply to post by filledcup
I think you only know about the carbon dating flaws from creationist websites, but you should also know that we assume the age of the Earth to be about 4.6 billion years from Radiocarbon dating, Potassium-Argon dating, and Uranium-Lead dating.
the problem here is that "we assume" it is not fact. Once again, you are taking man's word for it. The age of the earth will never be proven unless run across a time machine one day.
You are right, it's not a fact and to be truly proven we might have to go back in a time machine. But there is something you don't know. Science agrees with you.
Science doesn't show us our past as a fact. What it shows is that the Earth is about 4.6 billion years, take or add a few million years. Science is not perfect but it's the best explanation.
We know the Earth to be about 4.6 million years with different dating methods. They all came to about 4.6 billion years, which enforces our confidence that it's right.
OMG, don't make me start on this guy. I'll leave this alone. Dawkins has already been blasted and re-blasted again and again. Don't make me post videos on him. But like i said, I'll leave this alone. You go ahead and keep believing all those man made teachings, lol.
Originally posted by danielsil18
reply to post by RealTruthSeeker
OMG, don't make me start on this guy. I'll leave this alone. Dawkins has already been blasted and re-blasted again and again. Don't make me post videos on him. But like i said, I'll leave this alone. You go ahead and keep believing all those man made teachings, lol.
I understand you don't like him because he attacks your religion, but don't shoot the messenger.
The video shows what evolution says.
It's like a rapist holding a Bible and me saying "omg i wont read that bible because a rapist made it". It's completely illogical.
Plus what Richard Dawkins teach is science, something you can learn from any other Biologists. So go watch the video if you want to know the answer to your question.
Those methods were created by man, so I guess I have to trust them. For thousands of years man has been telling us that God exist. So how come that can't enforce confidence that is most likely true?
LOOOL!! dont u just love that spin??? science agrees with us now hoorraaay..
no my friend.. science is being a hypocrit!
Originally posted by danielsil18
I want to ask everyone why wouldn't God just show himself to us and make us all know he exists.
Christians can't say they know God, they can only say they believe in him and they have faith. But why can't God come and show himself to us, tell us that he is real and that he wants everyone to follow his rules. After that we would all know he is real and start following him. Why would he just leave us a book written by men?
One of the arguments Christians make is that God wanted us to have free will. He wanted us to have the choice to follow or rebel. But the story of Lucifer says that he and other angels rebelled...but they knew God existed. So why would it be any different with us?
So my question arises, why can't God just make us know, not believe or have faith, but know he is real?edit on 1-7-2013 by danielsil18 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Sk8ergrl
Maybe what you quoted means that we the people need to look outside of the box at what our governments are doing. It could be a warning that what you see and hear from the tv, radio, newspapers are to get your attention while something else more sinister is happening elsewhere that is in your black-spot. I think that Satan is not a who but what and is in fact technology. Look at how technology has caused so many deaths and has been used for evil.
Originally posted by ecapsretuo
It is not that God is not showing itself; it is that we mostly haven't the consciousness to understand:
God is everywhere, everything, every atom of physicality and beyond.
Why doesn't the water show itself to the fish?