It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by TokiTheDestroyer
reply to post by FirstCasualty
You do have the right to your opinion.
It's wrong but you are totally entitled to having it.
Originally posted by FirstCasualty
reply to post by TokiTheDestroyer
Thanks but I'm in Canada. Was sort of hoping that we did things a little more sensibly up here but I was wrong.
Stay tuned we are privatizing the prison system soon, we should be on par in no time.
For the record by argument to not allow gay marriage is invalid yes.
My opinion that children should be raised by both genders cannot changed I fear regardless of the obvious humanity deregulation that's gone on without my noticing. Thats my opinion, I have a right to voice it because i never stated to dislike anyone.
And tranny is NOT the N word. If you think so you must not know any.
Originally posted by FirstCasualty
Originally posted by TokiTheDestroyer
reply to post by FirstCasualty
You do have the right to your opinion.
It's wrong but you are totally entitled to having it.
You THINK it's wrong and thats your right. But you nor anyone has a monopoly over what is right outside of math and grammar, which is something e-tough folk sometimes has trouble with. Im not directing that at you or anyone else Im just saying its an observation of mine.
Gay couples can adopt, pull your head out of the 1950's and join us over here in the 21st century where for some reason this is still an issue and we haven't moved on to more important things.
Originally posted by Helious
reply to post by TokiTheDestroyer
Gay couples can adopt, pull your head out of the 1950's and join us over here in the 21st century where for some reason this is still an issue and we haven't moved on to more important things.
So, what your saying is....... Your constant pestering and bothersome behavior towards government has forced them into allowing what goes far past "rights" as it pertains to equality and now you wan't to beg the state for adopting children?
Children that were conceived between a man and a women but that you undoubtedly have the RIGHT to adopt because gay couples are all about love and nurturing and just because you couldn't conceive a child is no reason for backward thinking that possibly you were not really intended to raise one "together".
Talk about alcoholic fathers and broken families all you want. I support gay "rights" up and to a point but adoption is where it ends and I start to get a little unhinged because it's profane to say you have some right to do it when clearly, you do not.
Your validation in this situation comes from the state and the state alone, I guess it's no wonder most gay activist are staunch liberals.edit on 30-5-2013 by Helious because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Helious
reply to post by TokiTheDestroyer
Your validation in this situation comes from the state and the state alone, I guess it's no wonder most gay activist are staunch liberals.edit on 30-5-2013 by Helious because: (no reason given)
So you would rather have children in foster care or orphanages, than to be raised in a loving family, even if both parents were the same gender? Do not know where you are but the foster system here in the USA has some serious issues.
Originally posted by TokiTheDestroyer
Originally posted by Helious
reply to post by TokiTheDestroyer
Your validation in this situation comes from the state and the state alone, I guess it's no wonder most gay activist are staunch liberals.edit on 30-5-2013 by Helious because: (no reason given)
I'm sorry, did you call me a liberal for feeling that homosexual couple should have the same rights as a heterosexual couple? And that little bit about my constant pestering and bothersome behavior, well, I guess you must view the civil rights movement of the 1950's as constant pestering and bothersome behavior, too. Did you by chance miss the big 'ol list of states I posted back on page two listing the status of LGBT adoptions in the individual states? My vindication in this situation comes from the fact that humans in general should be treated as equals and I'm not clinging to some archaic belief that homosexuals in and of themselves are harmful to anything in any way, shape or form.
By the by, I'm heterosexual, married and have a child.edit on 5/30/13 by TokiTheDestroyer because: (no reason given)
\
Originally posted by NoRegretsEver
First to the OP I am sorry for your lose, and for all of you that may have lost a loved on due to ignorace and hate.
The sad thing is that we are in the year 2013 and still cannot politely have a discussion, not about what someone is doing in the privacy of their own home, or even in a parade, but that we still feel the need to judge.
The stats of those that take their lives, are thrown out of their homes, or brutilized dont really make the paper or the front page, they are only seen as the jokers in a comedy, or as comedy relief, but there is a different side to all stories, and this one still seems to carry a stigma that has been going on for far to long.
Hopefull this thread wil stay alive and on-topic so that the above videos can be seen.
S&F,
Peace, NRE.
Originally posted by TokiTheDestroyer
reply to post by Helious
Actually, that falls on you.
Prove to me why they don't deserve to have children.
Oh, wait...............YOU CAN'T
edit on 5/30/13 by TokiTheDestroyer because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Helious
reply to post by BubbaJoe
So you would rather have children in foster care or orphanages, than to be raised in a loving family, even if both parents were the same gender? Do not know where you are but the foster system here in the USA has some serious issues.
That argument is tiresome and quite frankly one that has been used a thousand times before now. The answer is that the children need to be protected at all costs. I grew up without parents and it made me stronger and the person I am today.
Every gay couple is not the same, some are good and some are bad but at the end of the day, the gay population is a tiny minority and we do not need children raised in that type of environment because it is not natural and it's unfair to the children who never had a choice.
Gay ADULTS can petition for whatever rights and considerations they want and I largely agree they should have them but when it comes to children and the gay communities perceived rights to them, I say no, I say no on common sense grounds but also on grounds that say there is ZERO evidence to sustain the notion that a child raised in a gay home is any better off than one raised in a foster home.
Maybe you would be shocked by the results of that study if one was ever done. I wouldn't.
Originally posted by FirstCasualty
Originally posted by danneu89
reply to post by FirstCasualty
I didn't realize that raising children was a requirement of marriage. They should probably change the definition then.
No but marriage is a requirement for adoption if im not mistaken. To make sure the child get as stable of an environment as possible.
gay marriage will by default open the door to gay adoption, which i'm not for
I could care less if gay people get married, but i know for sure it can only lead to one place and that im not okay with.
sue me!