It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by tothetenthpower
There is no actual legal, or logical explanation to prevent homosexuals from marrying each other.
Not one person has provided an argument that I can't refute in 10 thousand characters or less.
~Tenth
Originally posted by tothetenthpower
reply to post by seabag
The 5% of this country who will benefit from DOMA being overturned will have no absolutely no impact on my life whatsoever just as they don’t know.
Yet you would choose to deny those people those benefits based on a personal, and religious understanding of a 3000 year old text?
Gotcha!
~Tenth
Yet you would choose to deny those people those benefits based on a personal, and religious understanding of a 3000 year old text?
Gotcha!
Originally posted by seabag
reply to post by tothetenthpower
Yet you would choose to deny those people those benefits based on a personal, and religious understanding of a 3000 year old text?
Gotcha!
I'm not denying anyone anything. I'd just prefer it be called a civil union. I've maintained that position from the beginning....I guess you missed it.
If they just called it a civil union then everyone would be happy.
Originally posted by XaniMatriX
HUH you people are still arguing on behalf of a fairy tale.
Oh I keep forgetting we always have this same conversation, and then you say that, and I say:
Well I agree entirely, calling it marriage is stupid, not calling it marriage to me is also stupid, but whatever works.
Originally posted by XxNightAngelusxX
Originally posted by XaniMatriX
HUH you people are still arguing on behalf of a fairy tale.
And YOU people are still lingering on threads just to troll.
Just because you don't believe in God doesn't mean you have to hate-monger on people who do.
Yet Christians are condemned for their disagreements with gays.
I guess discrimination is okay if done by Atheists, right?
Disgusting.
Originally posted by XaniMatriX
Originally posted by tothetenthpower
reply to post by seabag
The 5% of this country who will benefit from DOMA being overturned will have no absolutely no impact on my life whatsoever just as they don’t know.
Yet you would choose to deny those people those benefits based on a personal, and religious understanding of a 3000 year old text?
Gotcha!
~Tenth
That's what i have been saying, it's such an old text that is so irrelevant to life, it's unbelievable people take it seriously. Then apply those words to real life to judge and persecute other's around them.
Originally posted by XaniMatriX
I do believe in GOD, which is this planet. Giving me direct contact to the creator.
Second of all, Christianity is based on a fairy tale, can someone please answer me why we don't recognise that as insanity?
Originally posted by seabag
Originally posted by Casualboy100
I Don't get why rights are being questioned because of church. IS this the 1800s?
Rights aren't being questioned. Nobody is denying anyone the right to form a union.
People are crying because they want EXACTLY the same word (marriage) as straight people. When did a religious ceremony become a right?
Originally posted by seabag
reply to post by beezzer
I can't believe I'm one of the few conservatives on this site who just don't care about sexual orientation!
Ummmm….you're not. Almost nobody cares what two adults do! However, many believe in the Defense of Marriage Act and support the sanctity of the institution of marriage. This isn’t a conservative thing, friend. The Defense of Marriage Act passed with overwhelming bipartisan support.
en.wikipedia.org...
The bill moved through Congress on a legislative fast track and met with overwhelming approval in both houses of the Republican-controlled Congress, passing by a vote of 85–14 in the Senate and a vote of 342–67 in the House
Originally posted by darkbake
Originally posted by XaniMatriX
I do believe in GOD, which is this planet. Giving me direct contact to the creator.
Second of all, Christianity is based on a fairy tale, can someone please answer me why we don't recognise that as insanity?
Okay, it is official. We are all evenly screwed here.
Originally posted by seabag
As far as I’m concerned, gays can get married, adopt kids, get artificially inseminated and then abort the kid because the eye color wasn’t right....whatever they want. That’s not my burden to carry, it’s theirs.
On Jan. 6, Republican presidential hopeful Rick Santorum told a New Hampshire audience that children are better off with a father in prison than being raised in a home with lesbian parents and no father at all. And last Monday (Jan. 9), Pope Benedict called gay marriage a threat "to the future of humanity itself," citing the need for children to have heterosexual homes.
But research on families headed by gays and lesbians doesn't back up these dire assertions. In fact, in some ways, gay parents may bring talents to the table that straight parents don't...
The new study by two University of Southern California sociologists says children with lesbian or gay parents show more empathy for social diversity, are less confined by gender stereotypes, and are probably more likely to explore homosexual activity themselves. Writing in recent issue of the American Sociological Review, the authors say that the emotional health of the two sets of children is essentially the same...
A new study suggests children of gay parents are not only psychologically healthy, but often appear to exhibit better social and academic adjustment and a significantly lower incidence of social problems than their peers.
Research suggests that they turn out about the same, no better, no worse and no more likely to be gay than other kids
Originally posted by tothetenthpower
reply to post by seabag
The 5% of this country who will benefit from DOMA being overturned will have no absolutely no impact on my life whatsoever just as they don’t know.
Yet you would choose to deny those people those benefits based on a personal, and religious understanding of a 3000 year old text?
Gotcha!
Originally posted by seabag
If they just called it a civil union then everyone would be happy.