It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
Originally posted by Kram09
I thought the military weren't allowed on U.S. streets?
They sure look like the military to me in that picture. The police in the U.S. have been so militarised there's not much distinction with equipment like that.
National Guard is absolutely allowed on US streets.
Originally posted by ivbnu
reply to post by captaintyinknots
That is obsurd. So you are saying they just dropped it in 2011 and that was that. It is not a violation of someones rights to follow them to an event to see what they are up to.
Are you saying they checked just not him? that seems odd and sloppy. Still thier fault imo.
The National guard is excluded from Posse Comitatus act while under the authority of a governor of a state.
Originally posted by lynxpilot
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
Originally posted by Kram09
I thought the military weren't allowed on U.S. streets?
They sure look like the military to me in that picture. The police in the U.S. have been so militarised there's not much distinction with equipment like that.
National Guard is absolutely allowed on US streets.
Not if their paycheck or the operation is funded by the federal government.
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
I have a question for all those who oppose this type of action:
Why, as a member of a society, would you NOT want to help the police in catching dangerous and armed criminals who had already murdered 3 people and injured over 200 more? Why would you want to make it MORE difficult to find that person?
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
The National guard is excluded from Posse Comitatus act while under the authority of a governor of a state.
Originally posted by lynxpilot
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
Originally posted by Kram09
I thought the military weren't allowed on U.S. streets?
They sure look like the military to me in that picture. The police in the U.S. have been so militarised there's not much distinction with equipment like that.
National Guard is absolutely allowed on US streets.
Not if their paycheck or the operation is funded by the federal government.
en.wikipedia.org...
Originally posted by butcherguy
reply to post by captaintyinknots
I completely agree with your statement that the National Guard can be used on our streets.
Regarding my thought that you are dishonest,
Hmmm. Maybe you don't understand.
Here is the pertinent portion of your sentence without the words 'what' and 'if',
Would you do the shoe was on the other foot?
Now, remove the words 'would you do', those words that you seem to think change your sentence so much.
What if the shoe was on the other foot?
Removing the words 'what if' makes your sentence meaningless.
Removing the words 'would you do' does not change the meaning of the sentence.
I don't care if you are too dense to see it, but I am going with my gut and leaving troll-land.
Originally posted by lynxpilot
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
The National guard is excluded from Posse Comitatus act while under the authority of a governor of a state.
Originally posted by lynxpilot
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
Originally posted by Kram09
I thought the military weren't allowed on U.S. streets?
They sure look like the military to me in that picture. The police in the U.S. have been so militarised there's not much distinction with equipment like that.
National Guard is absolutely allowed on US streets.
Not if their paycheck or the operation is funded by the federal government.
en.wikipedia.org...
Which is exactly what I just said. Read.
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
Originally posted by lynxpilot
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
The National guard is excluded from Posse Comitatus act while under the authority of a governor of a state.
Originally posted by lynxpilot
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
Originally posted by Kram09
I thought the military weren't allowed on U.S. streets?
They sure look like the military to me in that picture. The police in the U.S. have been so militarised there's not much distinction with equipment like that.
National Guard is absolutely allowed on US streets.
Not if their paycheck or the operation is funded by the federal government.
en.wikipedia.org...
Which is exactly what I just said. Read.
Fair enough, then, maybe I missed the point of what you were saying. I am speaking of this situation, and in this situation, it was completely legal for the national guard to be on the streets.
Originally posted by neformore
reply to post by kosmicjack
Ok.
How would you go about catching a potentiality dangerous terrorist who has no regard for human life whatsoever and has killed on two occasions that is at large in an urban area and may have access to explosives and possible accomplices?
Remember, you have no clue where he is at all, except for a general area, no idea what his motives are and what equipment he has at his disposal.
There's a pretty heavy-duty scenario. How do you solve it?
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
If you automatically oppose anything that has to do with the police, keep in mind, that you are a major part of the problem, not the solution.
Ugh.
Originally posted by ivbnu
reply to post by captaintyinknots
Maybe you missed it. THEY KNEW WHO HE WAS. They talked to him in 2011, he was no threat. So when his picture came up and he became a suspect they al the sudden didn't know him anymore? that does't make sense.
Originally posted by 3mperorConstantinE
I would prefer to deal with the 19 year old kid with the crock potsand the stolen gunhiding in my backyard shed, rather than see g'damned troops barreling down residential city streets in my neighborhood.
I'm not asking the 5-0 for any protection or help. Don't want it and I don't need it, and everyone I know feels exactly the same. That's just not how we do things.
If the 19 year old wants to try to break into my home, then that'll be his problem.
I don't want heavily-armed DHS/FBI/BPD/SWAT/N.Guard. fellas aiming their damned weapons in my open windows, shouting to shut them, and "shelter in place!", or "Get your hands up! Move! Move! Move!" as innocent people are emptied from their residence.
F—that.
They were looking for young, urban dwelling people here America.
They weren't hunting down the the Fallujah Brigade.
Ten FBI agents could have remedied this situation faster.
There is no excuse for this costly exercise which runs roughshod over the long-established principles of personal Liberty in this country.
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
reply to post by gladtobehere
Originally posted by gladtobehere
Clearly, the photographer was using his camera, was that his crime, taking a pic?
No one said there was a crime. Was the photographer arrested?
Your title is actually very good advice. If your town is on lock-down and there's a military presence in the street outside your house, it's a REALLY good idea to stay away from the doors and windows. Any movement under these circumstances is going to attract the powerful end of a weapon. It's common sense. They were looking for an armed and dangerous man. Don't give them any reason to think you might be him.
Originally posted by GenerationGap
The moment an innocent person standing in their bedroom window was actively placed in iron sights by the person supposedly protecting them is a line in my book. That would be terrifying and just because some Islamic a-holes killed a bunch of people doesn't mean another innocent needs to be terrorized in turn by a domestic army cruising down the street in a armored truck with a rifle turret. I mean isn't marching the army down a street in some ways giving these sicko's exactly what they want: terrorize people?